To: | Campaign Entertainment AB (contact@campaignentertainment.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88417675 - COLONY - N/A |
Sent: | July 19, 2019 03:55:31 PM |
Sent As: | ecom120@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88417675
Mark: COLONY
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Campaign Entertainment AB
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: July 19, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis: (1) the similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and services. See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.,544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE MARKS
Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Applicant’s applied-for mark is “COLONY” for “Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles(Based on 44(e)) Downloadable computer game software” in International Class 9.
The mark in U.S. Registration No. 4,298,559 is “BOT COLONY” for “Children's educational software; Computer game discs; Computer game equipment, namely, discs; Computer game programmes; Computer game programmes downloadable via the Internet; Computer game programs; Computer game software; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Computer game software for use with personal computers, home video game consoles used with televisions, and for arcade-based video game consoles; Computer programs for pre-recorded games; Computer programs for video and computer games; Computer-gaming software; Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable computer programs featuring positionable game piece figures for use in the field of computer games; Downloadable electronic game programs; Downloadable virtual goods, namely, computer programs featuring artifacts for use in online virtual worlds; Educational software featuring instruction in English and analytical thinking; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Game software; Interactive game programs; Interactive game software; Interactive video game programs; Recorded computer game programs; Robots for personal, educational and hobby use and structural parts therefor; Video and computer game programs; Video game discs; Video game software; Virtual reality game software” in International Class 9 and “Entertainment in the nature of language games; Entertainment services, namely, conducting alternate reality games via the internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring games and puzzles; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; Entertainment services, namely, providing brain training games on-line and in mobile wireless form; Entertainment services, namely, providing games of chance via the Internet; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games that help maintain an active brain and thus improve memory, speed of processing, and that provide a variety of cognitive benefits that positively impact quality of life; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Rental of video games” in International Class 41.
The mark in U.S. Registration No. 4,652,645 is “DUNGEON COLONY” for “Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games” in International Class 9.
The mark in U.S. Registration No. 4,993,838 is the stylized wording “COLONY 42” for “Computer game equipment, namely, discs; computer game programmes; computer game programmes downloadable via the internet; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; computer game software for use with personal computers, home video game consoles used with televisions and arcade-based video game consoles; computer hardware for communicating audio, video and data between computers via a global computer network, wide-area computer networks, and peer-to-peer computer networks; electronic game programs; electronic game software for wireless devices; video game discs; video game software” in International Class 9 and “Computer game instruction manuals; printed materials, namely, novels and series of fiction books and short stories featuring scenes and characters based on video games” in International Class 41.
The mark in U.S. Registration No. 5,278,758 is “JOIN THE COLONY” for, in relevant part, “Interactive game software downloadable from a computer network, video game software, computer game programs downloadable via the internet and via wired or wireless apparatus; downloadable multimedia files containing pre-recorded audio or audio-visual content in the fields of musical performances, comedic or dramatic outtakes, personality quizzes, math quizzes and featuring interactive games, provided via the internet or via wired or wireless apparatus; excluding gambling games and games of chance” in International Class 9 and “Televised entertainment services, namely, television game shows, talk shows and reality shows and ongoing television programs in the field of comedy; production of entertainment television programs and production of films; online game services via a computer network, namely, non-downloadable quiz games and interactive games; provision of non-downloadable videos online featuring game shows and reality shows; production of television shows; cultural activities, namely, organization of cultural shows and arranging of contests featuring cultural knowledge quizzes for cultural purposes; organization of competitions featuring subject matter relating to television game shows, talk shows and reality shows, all for education and entertainment purposes; excluding gambling games and games of chance” in International Class 41.
The mark in U.S. Registration No. 5,408,315 is “AVEN COLONY” for “Computer game software” in International Class 9 and “Entertainment services, namely, providing computer games and video games online and via electronic devices” in International Class 41.
When comparing marks, “[t]he proper test is not a side-by-side comparison of the marks, but instead whether the marks are sufficiently similar in terms of their commercial impression such that [consumers] who encounter the marks would be likely to assume a connection between the parties.” Cai v. Diamond Hong, Inc., __ F.3d __, 127 USPQ2d 1797, 1801 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (quoting Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1368, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1721 (Fed. Cir. 2012)); TMEP §1207.01(b). The proper focus is on the recollection of the average purchaser, who retains a general rather than specific impression of trademarks. In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re St. Helena Hosp., 774 F.3d 747, 750-51, 113 USPQ2d 1082, 1085 (Fed. Cir. 2014); Geigy Chem. Corp. v. Atlas Chem. Indus., Inc., 438 F.2d 1005, 1007, 169 USPQ 39, 40 (CCPA 1971)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Based on the foregoing, the applicant’s applied-for and registrants’ marks are sufficiently similar to find a likelihood of confusion.
RELATEDNESS OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES
In this case, the registrations which cover Class 9 computer game goods use broad wording such as “computer game software” and “video game software” to describe the goods, which presumably encompasses all goods of the type described, including applicant’s more narrowly defined goods, namely, downloadable computer game software. See, e.g., In re Solid State Design Inc., 125 USPQ2d 1409, 1412-15 (TTAB 2018); Sw. Mgmt., Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd., 115 USPQ2d 1007, 1025 (TTAB 2015). Thus, applicant’s and registrants’ goods and services are legally identical. See, e.g., In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 127 USPQ2d 1627, 1629 (TTAB 2018) (citing Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. v.Gen. Mills Fun Grp., Inc., 648 F.2d 1335, 1336, 209 USPQ 986, 988 (C.C.P.A. 1981); Inter IKEA Sys. B.V. v. Akea, LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1734, 1745 (TTAB 2014); Baseball Am. Inc. v. Powerplay Sports Ltd., 71 USPQ2d 1844, 1847 n.9 (TTAB 2004)).
Additionally, the goods and services of the parties have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers and are “presumed to travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.” In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)). Thus, applicant’s and registrants’ goods and services are related.
Based on the analysis above, applicant’s and registrants’ goods and services are related.
Because applicant’s and registrants’ marks are similar and the goods and services are related, there is a likelihood of confusion and applicant’s applied-for mark must be refused under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act.
ADVISORY: PRIOR PENDING APPLICATIONS
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the marks in the referenced applications. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
ASSISTANCE
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/John S. Miranda/
Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 120
United States Patent and Trademark Office
571-272-4553
John.Miranda@USPTO.GOV
RESPONSE GUIDANCE
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.