Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88416567 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 101 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88416567/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | PROTERRA |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
Applicant has amended the description of goods as suggested by the Examining Attorney and has added class 1 to the application. The fee for the new class is submitted herewith.
The Examining Attorney has indicated there may be a likelihood of confusion between pending application serial numbers 87/562,369 and 87/562,384 for the mark TERRA PROTEIN and the subject PROTERRA mark. Applicant respectfully disagrees.
With respect to the marks, the sight, sound and commercial impression created by Applicant's PROTERRA mark is sufficiently different from the cited TERRA PROTEIN mark to prevent consumer confusion. The common portions of the marks are in reverse order, and the terms sound very different. Applicant's mark is a singular fanciful word, whereas the cited application incudes two terms, one of which is the real word PROTEIN. Consumers will not perceive products sold under the fanciful mark PROTERRA to be related to or emanate from the same source as those sold under the TERRA PROTEIN mark.
With respect to the goods, the goods covered by the cited applications are sufficiently different from those covered by the present application that consumers will not be confused as to the source of the goods, particularly when combined with the differences in the marks discussed above. Customers will understand a textured vegetable protein to be different from a protein enriched powdered starch or protein supplement powder. The products themselves are different in structure, with the TERRA PROTEIN products existing in powder form whereas PROTERRA products are textured plant-based proteins, for example granules, chips/flakes or shreds.
Further, the products are used for different purposes and sold in different channels of trade. Applicant's textured proteins are sold as meat extenders or substitutes, and Applicant's proteins in class 1 are for the food industry (e.g. companies producing food on an industrial scale). Applicant's products will be sold as products for further processing into food and pet food and will be branded again by Applicant's customers for retail or food service end user markets.
In contrast, the TERRA PROTEIN applications cover protein supplement powders in class 5 and powdered starch in class 30, which covers products ready for consumption or conserving/improving the flavor of food. Such products are used for very different purposes than Applicant's products discussed above and are sold in different trade channels. The TERRA PROTEIN powders would be sold at retail and possibly to food service customers, but not to industrial food producers.
Applicant's customers are highly sophisticated and will utilize Applicant's PROTERRA protein products to produce final food products. It is unlikely retail purchasers of the TERRA PROETIN powders would encounter Applicant's PROTERRA products because of the different intended uses and channels of trade. To the extent there is any overlap with Applicant's food industry customers and customers of the cited TERRA PROTEIN products, such customers will be sophisticated and not likely to be confused by the use of the dissimilar marks in connection with their respective products for different uses.
In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully submits that there is no likelihood of confusion between Applicant's marks and the cited marks. Applicant requests that its Application not be suspended and requests that the present application be allowed. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (029)(current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 029 |
DESCRIPTION | |
protein for industrial preparation of food; formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (029)(proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 029 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (001)(class added) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 001 |
DESCRIPTION | Proteins for the food industry |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |
NAME | ANDREA F. SELLERS |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | STINSON LLP |
STREET | 1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900 |
CITY | KANSAS CITY |
STATE | Missouri |
POSTAL CODE | 64106-2150 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 816-691-3426 |
FAX | 816-691-3495 |
trademark@stinson.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 3001926-0118 |
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | ANDREA F. SELLERS |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | STINSON LLP |
STREET | 1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900 |
CITY | KANSAS CITY |
STATE | Missouri |
POSTAL CODE | 64106-2150 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 816-691-3426 |
FAX | 816-691-3495 |
trademark@stinson.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 3001926-0118 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |
NAME | ANDREA F. SELLERS |
FIRM NAME | STINSON LLP |
STREET | 1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900 |
CITY | KANSAS CITY |
STATE | Missouri |
POSTAL CODE | 64106-2150 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 816-691-3426 |
FAX | 816-691-3495 |
trademark@stinson.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 3001926-0118 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | ANDREA F. SELLERS |
FIRM NAME | STINSON LLP |
STREET | 1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900 |
CITY | KANSAS CITY |
STATE | Missouri |
POSTAL CODE | 64106-2150 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 816-691-3426 |
FAX | 816-691-3495 |
trademark@stinson.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 3001926-0118 |
PAYMENT SECTION | |
NUMBER OF CLASSES | 1 |
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION PER CLASS | 275 |
TOTAL FEES DUE | 275 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /Andrea F. Sellers/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Andrea F. Sellers |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, Missouri bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 816-691-3426 |
DATE SIGNED | 09/23/2019 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Andrea F. Sellers/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Andrea F. Sellers |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record |
DATE SIGNED | 09/23/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Sep 23 11:49:24 EDT 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XX.XX-20 190923114924452252-884165 67-6103fab11d59b98e4ab482 85950f6ddd81ea833d6ccd462 2c60414b898ccc32087-DA-49 240383-201909231126370125 25 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Applicant has amended the description of goods as suggested by the Examining Attorney and has added class 1 to the application. The fee for the new class is submitted herewith.
The Examining Attorney has indicated there may be a likelihood of confusion between pending application serial numbers 87/562,369 and 87/562,384 for the mark TERRA PROTEIN and the subject PROTERRA mark. Applicant respectfully disagrees.
With respect to the marks, the sight, sound and commercial impression created by Applicant's PROTERRA mark is sufficiently different from the cited TERRA PROTEIN mark to prevent consumer confusion. The common portions of the marks are in reverse order, and the terms sound very different. Applicant's mark is a singular fanciful word, whereas the cited application incudes two terms, one of which is the real word PROTEIN. Consumers will not perceive products sold under the fanciful mark PROTERRA to be related to or emanate from the same source as those sold under the TERRA PROTEIN mark.
With respect to the goods, the goods covered by the cited applications are sufficiently different from those covered by the present application that consumers will not be confused as to the source of the goods, particularly when combined with the differences in the marks discussed above. Customers will understand a textured vegetable protein to be different from a protein enriched powdered starch or protein supplement powder. The products themselves are different in structure, with the TERRA PROTEIN products existing in powder form whereas PROTERRA products are textured plant-based proteins, for example granules, chips/flakes or shreds.
Further, the products are used for different purposes and sold in different channels of trade. Applicant's textured proteins are sold as meat extenders or substitutes, and Applicant's proteins in class 1 are for the food industry (e.g. companies producing food on an industrial scale). Applicant's products will be sold as products for further processing into food and pet food and will be branded again by Applicant's customers for retail or food service end user markets.
In contrast, the TERRA PROTEIN applications cover protein supplement powders in class 5 and powdered starch in class 30, which covers products ready for consumption or conserving/improving the flavor of food. Such products are used for very different purposes than Applicant's products discussed above and are sold in different trade channels. The TERRA PROTEIN powders would be sold at retail and possibly to food service customers, but not to industrial food producers.
Applicant's customers are highly sophisticated and will utilize Applicant's PROTERRA protein products to produce final food products. It is unlikely retail purchasers of the TERRA PROETIN powders would encounter Applicant's PROTERRA products because of the different intended uses and channels of trade. To the extent there is any overlap with Applicant's food industry customers and customers of the cited TERRA PROTEIN products, such customers will be sophisticated and not likely to be confused by the use of the dissimilar marks in connection with their respective products for different uses.
In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully submits that there is no likelihood of confusion between Applicant's marks and the cited marks. Applicant requests that its Application not be suspended and requests that the present application be allowed.
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.