To: | Cyberboss, Inc. (dabneyeastham@yahoo.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88404260 - CYBERBOSS - 168-101US1T |
Sent: | July 17, 2019 02:14:46 PM |
Sent As: | ecom102@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88404260
Mark: CYBERBOSS
|
|
Correspondence Address: LAW OFFICE OF R. DABNEY EASTHAM
|
|
Applicant: Cyberboss, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 168-101US1T
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: July 17, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
Search Results
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Identification Of Services Unacceptable In Part-Use Of Parentheses
Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses from the identification and incorporate any parenthetical or bracketed information into the description of the goods and/or services. For example, applicant may amend the current identification, namely “Educational services, namely, providing on-line instruction in the field of computer science that matches students with tutors having certifications that may be verified by distributed, decentralized, public ledgers (blockchain network) and issues certificates to students of satisfactory completion of courses wherein the certificates may be verified by blockchain networks” to “Educational services, namely, providing on-line instruction in the field of computer science that matches students with tutors having certifications that may be verified by distributed, decentralized, public ledgers, namely a blockchain network, and issues certificates to students of satisfactory completion of courses wherein the certificates may be verified by blockchain networks”, if accurate.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Ferraiuolo, Dominic
/DominicJFerraiuolo/
Examining Attorney, U.S.P.T.O.
Law Office 102
tel: 571-272-9156
fax: 571-273-9102
email: dominic.ferraiuolo@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE