NOTE TO THE FILE
SERIAL NUMBER: 88401621
DATE: 06/05/2019
NAME: vriley
NOTE:
Searched:
Lexis/Nexis
OneLook
Wikipedia
Acronym Finder Protest evidence reviewed
Other:Checked:
Geographic significance
Surname
Translation
ID with ID/CLASS mailboxChecked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents
Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
phone Left message with
X email Attorney/ApplicantRequested Law Library search X Issued Examiner’s Amendment
for: and entered changes in TRADEUPSPRINT DO NOT PRINT Added design code in TRADEUPS
Description of the mark
Translation statement Re-imaged standard character
drawing
Negative translation statement
Consent of living individual Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
about misclassified definite ID
Changed TRADEUPS to:That is also fine
Marilyn
> On Jun 5, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Riley, Vanessa <Vanessa.Riley@uspto.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi Marilyn,
>
> I'm sorry I have to come back to you on this, but I realized that "product" could refer to goods outside class 5 (for example, there are cat litters that are advertised for treating respiratory disease). Would you accept:
>
> "veterinary preparations for treating respiratory disease"
>
> The term preparations would prevent the identification from being overly broad.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vanessa Riley
> Examining Attorney
> Law Office 127
> (571) 272-7259
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brogan, Marilyn [mailto:MBrogan@haugpartners.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 1:26 PM
> To: Riley, Vanessa <Vanessa.Riley@USPTO.GOV>
> Cc: Frommer, William <WFrommer@haugpartners.com>; Nicolau, Victoria S. <VNicolau@haugpartners.com>
> Subject: Re: VENTULA 88401621
>
> That is fine please proceed with that minor change
>
> Marilyn
>
>> On Jun 5, 2019, at 11:35 AM, Riley, Vanessa <Vanessa.Riley@uspto.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marilyn,
>>
>> Would " veterinary products for treating respiratory disease" be acceptable for this mark and for Imprezair? The wording "used in connection with" is still a little vague.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Vanessa Riley
>> Examining Attorney
>> Law Office 127
>> (571) 272-7259
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brogan, Marilyn [mailto:MBrogan@haugpartners.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 10:29 AM
>> To: Riley, Vanessa <Vanessa.Riley@USPTO.GOV>
>> Cc: Frommer, William <WFrommer@haugpartners.com>; Nicolau, Victoria S. <VNicolau@haugpartners.com>
>> Subject: VENTULA 88401621
>>
>> Dear Ms Riley
>> Thank you for your recent email regarding this and two other cases. With respect to this case, please be advised that our client proposes to amend the class 5 goods as follows:
>> "veterinary product used in connection with respiratory disease"
>>
>> Please let us know if this is acceptable and we hope to get you comments shortly on the other two cases.
>>
>> Regards
>> Marilyn
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This email originates from Haug Partners LLP. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named herein, and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. The dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, please promptly notify us at firm@haugpartners.com or (212) 588-0800.
>