Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88396611 | ||||||||||||
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 122 | ||||||||||||
MARK SECTION | |||||||||||||
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88396611/mark.png | ||||||||||||
LITERAL ELEMENT | SELKIRK | ||||||||||||
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES | ||||||||||||
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES | ||||||||||||
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. | ||||||||||||
ARGUMENT(S) | |||||||||||||
This is a response to the Office Action issued on July 8, 2019, wherein the Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s SELKIRK mark, Serial Number 88/396,611, on the grounds that that the applied-for mark is merely a surname pursuant to Section 2(e)(4) of the Lanham Act. Applicant respectfully disagrees that the applied-for mark is merely a surname for the reasons set forth below and requests that the refusal be withdrawn and the application be advanced to publication. Whether a mark is primarily merely a surname depends on the primary significance of the mark as a whole to the purchasing public. TMEP 1211.01. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has identified several non-exclusive factors that may lead to evidence regarding the public’s perception of a term’s primary significance: (1) whether the surname is rare; (2) whether the term is the surname of anyone connected with the applicant; (3) whether the term has any recognized meaning other than as a surname; (4) whether it has the “structure and pronunciation” of a surname; and TMEP 1211.01.[i] If there is any doubt as to whether a term is primarily merely a surname, the Board will resolve the doubt in favor of the applicant. Id. Here, Applicant respectfully disagrees that the evidence presented by the Examining Attorney establishes a prima face case that Applicant’s SELKIRK mark is primarily merely a surname. TMEP 1211.02(a).
[i] The Board has also identified as an additional factor whether the stylization of the applied-for mark’s lettering is distinctive enough to create a separate commercial impression. TMEP 1211.01. However, where, as here, the applied-for mark is in standard characters, it is unnecessary to consider this factor. Id.
[ii] In re Carlo Ferrara SA, Ser. No. 79162222, 2017 WL 4154949, *3 (TTAB Aug. 25, 2017) (“As conceded by the Examining Attorney, there is no evidence that anyone connected to Applicant has the surname FERET. The fact that the proposed mark is not the surname of someone associated with Applicant . . ., does not tend to establish one way or the other whether the proposed mark would be perceived as a surname.”)
[iii] Id. at *4-6 (considering evidence from Census Bureau when finding that FERET did not have broad public exposure as a surname).
[iv] Id. at *6 (finding that although FERET is a surname having 375 listings in LEXISNEXIS® surname database, there was “very little evidence of media attention or publicity of persons having that surname” and “no showing of any widely recognized public personalities with that surname,”; thus, “FERET has not been shown to have broad public exposure” necessary to take it out of rare surname category); see also In re Joint-Stock Company Baik, 84 USPQ2d (BNA) 1921, 1923 (TTAB 2007) (“we conclude that Baik is an extremely rare surname. In concluding so, we rely on the fact that only 456 examples of the Baik surname were located from a comprehensive directory of the entire United States.”).
|
|||||||||||||
EVIDENCE SECTION | |||||||||||||
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_69821736-20190815171533137065_._Leadership___Selkirk_Pharma___Spokane__WA.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0002.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0003.JPG | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_69821736-20190815171533137065_._Selkirk__Scottish_Borders_-_Wikipedia.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (4 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0004.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0005.JPG | |||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0006.JPG | |||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0007.JPG | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_69821736-20190815171533137065_._Selkirk_Ex_1.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0008.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0009.JPG | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_69821736-20190815171533137065_._Selkirk_Ex_2.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0010.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0011.JPG | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_69821736-20190815171533137065_._Selkirk_Ex_3.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0012.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0013.JPG | |||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | evidence references in argument | ||||||||||||
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (040)(current) | |||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 040 | ||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION | |||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical manufacturing; pharmaceutical production; pharmaceutical testing; contract manufacturing services in the field of pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (040)(proposed) | |||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 040 | ||||||||||||
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical manufacturing; |
|||||||||||||
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical manufacturing; contract manufacturing services in the field of pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (042)(class added) | |||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 042 | ||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION | |||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical production in the nature of pharmaceutical product development; testing of pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 03/28/2018 | ||||||||||||
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. | ||||||||||||
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) | |||||||||||||
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | SPN0-69821736-20190815171533137065_._Specimen_Selkirk.pdf | ||||||||||||
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (2 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0014.JPG | ||||||||||||
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\966\88396611\xml4\ROA0015.JPG | |||||||||||||
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | use of mark in connection with description of offered services. | ||||||||||||
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |||||||||||||
NAME | Matthew E. Moersfelder | ||||||||||||
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED | ||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP | ||||||||||||
STREET | 920 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 | ||||||||||||
CITY | SEATTLE | ||||||||||||
STATE | Washington | ||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 98104-1610 | ||||||||||||
COUNTRY | US | ||||||||||||
PHONE | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
FAX | 206-757-7014 | ||||||||||||
seatm@dwt.com | |||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 108703-4 | ||||||||||||
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |||||||||||||
NAME | Matthew E. Moersfelder | ||||||||||||
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX | ||||||||||||
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX | ||||||||||||
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX | ||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP | ||||||||||||
STREET | 920 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 | ||||||||||||
CITY | SEATTLE | ||||||||||||
STATE | Washington | ||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 98104-1610 | ||||||||||||
COUNTRY | United States | ||||||||||||
PHONE | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
FAX | 206-757-7014 | ||||||||||||
seatm@dwt.com | |||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 108703-4 | ||||||||||||
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |||||||||||||
NAME | MATTHEW E. MOERSFELDER | ||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP | ||||||||||||
STREET | 920 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 | ||||||||||||
CITY | SEATTLE | ||||||||||||
STATE | Washington | ||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 98104-1610 | ||||||||||||
COUNTRY | US | ||||||||||||
PHONE | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
FAX | 206-757-7014 | ||||||||||||
seatm@dwt.com; mmoersfelder@dwt.com; chrishagemann@dwt.com; emilyeskew@dwt.com | |||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 108703-4 | ||||||||||||
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |||||||||||||
NAME | Matthew E. Moersfelder | ||||||||||||
FIRM NAME | DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP | ||||||||||||
STREET | 920 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 3300 | ||||||||||||
CITY | SEATTLE | ||||||||||||
STATE | Washington | ||||||||||||
POSTAL CODE | 98104-1610 | ||||||||||||
COUNTRY | United States | ||||||||||||
PHONE | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
FAX | 206-757-7014 | ||||||||||||
seatm@dwt.com; mmoersfelder@dwt.com; emilyeskew@dwt.com; chrishagemann@dwt.com | |||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes | ||||||||||||
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 108703-4 | ||||||||||||
PAYMENT SECTION | |||||||||||||
NUMBER OF CLASSES | 1 | ||||||||||||
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION PER CLASS | 275 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL FEES DUE | 275 | ||||||||||||
SIGNATURE SECTION | |||||||||||||
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /MEM/ | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Matthew E. Moersfelder | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Applicant's Attorney, WA Bar Member | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
DATE SIGNED | 08/15/2019 | ||||||||||||
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /MEM/ | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Matthew E. Moersfelder | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Applicant's Attorney, WA Bar Member | ||||||||||||
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 206-757-8014 | ||||||||||||
DATE SIGNED | 08/15/2019 | ||||||||||||
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES | ||||||||||||
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |||||||||||||
SUBMIT DATE | Thu Aug 15 17:26:18 EDT 2019 | ||||||||||||
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.X.XXX.XX-201 90815172618190570-8839661 1-610a76265798ba7ec5ee7d6 34f113634771deccd3a5bc2f9 86871fe1583a44d0e-DA-2617 1100-20190815171533137065 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
This is a response to the Office Action issued on July 8, 2019, wherein the Examining Attorney refused registration of Applicant’s SELKIRK mark, Serial Number 88/396,611, on the grounds that that the applied-for mark is merely a surname pursuant to Section 2(e)(4) of the Lanham Act. Applicant respectfully disagrees that the applied-for mark is merely a surname for the reasons set forth below and requests that the refusal be withdrawn and the application be advanced to publication.
Whether a mark is primarily merely a surname depends on the primary significance of the mark as a whole to the purchasing public. TMEP 1211.01. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has identified several non-exclusive factors that may lead to evidence regarding the public’s perception of a term’s primary significance:
(1) whether the surname is rare;
(2) whether the term is the surname of anyone connected with the applicant;
(3) whether the term has any recognized meaning other than as a surname;
(4) whether it has the “structure and pronunciation” of a surname; and
TMEP 1211.01.[i] If there is any doubt as to whether a term is primarily merely a surname, the Board will resolve the doubt in favor of the applicant. Id.
Here, Applicant respectfully disagrees that the evidence presented by the Examining Attorney establishes a prima face case that Applicant’s SELKIRK mark is primarily merely a surname. TMEP 1211.02(a).
SELKIRK is not the Surname of Anyone Connected with Applicant.
A term that is the surname of an officer, owner, or principal of applicant’s business can be probative evidence of the term’s surname significance. TMEP §1211.02(b)(iv). The Examining Attorney included in the refusal a printout of an article from the Spokesman Review which included the language “Selkirk Pharma CEO Patrick Selkirk declined….” Based on that article, the Examining Attorney reasonably concluded that Applicant’s CEO’s surname was Selkirk. That article, however, did not properly identify the CEO’s name which is Patrick Haffey. This is demonstrated in part by Mr. Haffey’s signature and title on the original application as well as the included evidence from Applicant’s website identifying the leadership team of Selkirk Pharma, identifying Mr. Haffey as CEO. Applicant does not have any other individuals with the surname Selkirk connected with Applicant. In the absence of any evidence that a person using “Selkirk” as a surname has a relevant and tangible connection with Applicant, this factor is neutral.[ii]
SELKIRK is at Most an Extremely Rare Surname.
As the Examining Attorney notes, SELKIRK only appears 609 times as a surname in the LEXISNEXIS® surname database. The ranking of surnames compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau from the 2010 Census shows that Selkirk occurred a total of 445 time out of over 295 million people, or roughly 0.0000015% of people in the United States., see http://www.census.gov/topics/population/genealogy/data/2010_surnames.html. Applicant notes that the U.S. Census is a standard reference, and therefore judicial notice may be taken. In re Weiss Watch Co., 123 USPQ2d 1200, 1203 n.5 (TTAB 2017). However, Applicant is also happy to provide a printout of the table from the identified website, but notes that it will be in excess of 6000 PDF pages.[iii] This vanishingly small number of people with this surname as compared to the general United States population shows that Selkirk is a rare surname.
There is also nothing in record suggesting that consumers have been exposed in any meaningful way to Selkirk as a surname. TMEP 1211.01(a)(V). Given the overall rareness of the surname, this lack of exposure suggests that consumers would not consider the mark SELKIRK’s primary significance to be a surname. Based on this record, SELKIRK unquestionably qualifies as an extremely rare surname, which weighs against a finding that SELKIRK is primarily viewed by consumers as a surname.[iv]
The geographical significance of the mark SELKIRK is equally as dominant as the surname significance.
Whatever limited significance the applied-for mark may have as a surname, the geographical significance of the mark is equally dominant. In support that “Selkirk” is primarily a surname, the Examining Attorney relies in part on an entry from forebears.io which indicates that the significance of the surname is “of local origin from the town of Selkirk.” Applicant has also attached evidence showing that Selkirk is at least the name of a town and historic royal burgh in Scotland. The existence of this equally dominant meaning of Selkirk is further evidence that Selkirk is not considered by consumers to be primarily perceived as a surname. TMEP 1211.01(a)(iii).
There are other registration for SELKIRK that were permitted by the USPTO
The USPTO has previously allowed registration of the mark Selkirk which is further evidence that consumers to not believe the primary significance of the term is as a surname.
1,335,094 |
SELKIRK |
6: Pipes, and Clamps and Fittings Therefor, All Made Primarily of Metal 11: Gas Heaters and Pipes for Heating and Ventilating Equipment and Supports and Parts Therefor |
4,838,411 |
SELKIRK |
8: Hunting knives; side arms, not including firearms, namely, hunting knives; sport knives |
5,347,614 |
SELKIRK |
19: Hardwood flooring |
|
|
|
No Factor Weighs in Favor of Finding that SELKIRK is primarily merely a surname.
As demonstrated above, none of the factors weighs in favor of finding that SELKIRK is primarily merely a surname. Moreover, if there is any doubt as to whether a term is primarily merely a surname, the doubt must be resolved in favor of Applicant. TMEP 1211.01.
Accordingly, the Applicant respectfully requests that the refusal to register SELKIRK on the basis that the mark is primarily merely a surname is withdrawn.
[i] The Board has also identified as an additional factor whether the stylization of the applied-for mark’s lettering is distinctive enough to create a separate commercial impression. TMEP 1211.01. However, where, as here, the applied-for mark is in standard characters, it is unnecessary to consider this factor. Id.
[ii] In re Carlo Ferrara SA, Ser. No. 79162222, 2017 WL 4154949, *3 (TTAB Aug. 25, 2017) (“As conceded by the Examining Attorney, there is no evidence that anyone connected to Applicant has the surname FERET. The fact that the proposed mark is not the surname of someone associated with Applicant . . ., does not tend to establish one way or the other whether the proposed mark would be perceived as a surname.”)
[iii] Id. at *4-6 (considering evidence from Census Bureau when finding that FERET did not have broad public exposure as a surname).
[iv] Id. at *6 (finding that although FERET is a surname having 375 listings in LEXISNEXIS® surname database, there was “very little evidence of media attention or publicity of persons having that surname” and “no showing of any widely recognized public personalities with that surname,”; thus, “FERET has not been shown to have broad public exposure” necessary to take it out of rare surname category); see also In re Joint-Stock Company Baik, 84 USPQ2d (BNA) 1921, 1923 (TTAB 2007) (“we conclude that Baik is an extremely rare surname. In concluding so, we rely on the fact that only 456 examples of the Baik surname were located from a comprehensive directory of the entire United States.”).
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.