Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88396266 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 127 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88396266/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | VIBE |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
OWNER SECTION (current) | |
NAME | Fortuna Advisors LLC |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | 36th Floor |
STREET | One Penn Plaza |
CITY | New York |
STATE | New York |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 10119 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
OWNER SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Fortuna Advisors LLC |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | 36th Floor |
STREET | One Penn Plaza |
CITY | New York |
STATE | New York |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 10119 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
XXXX | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
In the Office Action, registration has been refused under Section 2(d) in view of US Registration No. 4,070,825 for the mark VIBE. The registration is directed to a number of services including business management; consultancy, advisory and information services to the aforementioned services. In order to more particularly define the Applicant’s services and address an objection to the identification of services, Applicant has amended the listing of services to read as follows: Class 36: Financial consulting services in the field of corporate share repurchases; providing financial counseling to businesses regarding the financial impacts associated with share repurchases; providing financial advising to companies as to timing share repurchases to enhance profitability Applicant respectfully submits that the distinction between the amended listing of services as well as the nature of the services would prevent a finding of likelihood of confusion. The cited registration is directed to business management and related advisory and consultancy. Such services relate to overseeing and supervising business operations including the day-to-day operations of a business. These services are not so broad as to cover financial consulting. In contrast, the services of the present application are directed to financial consulting services in the field of corporate share repurchases and providing financial consulting to businesses regarding the impact associated with share repurchases. The services also include providing financial advising to companies as to timing share repurchases to enhance profitability. Financial consulting relating to corporate share buybacks is not related to business management services which are directed to the day-to-day operations of a business or supervising such operations. Such financial consulting as to stock repurchasing is not directed to managing the business operation of the company. In addition, the services of financial consulting as to stock repurchases would typically be offered by different sources through different channels of trade than business management services. A financial consultant for stock buybacks would typically have different training and focus than one who is advising a company as to the operations of the business. Applicant respectfully submits that the significant difference between the services weighs heavily against a finding of a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark and that of the cited registration. Moreover, the nature of the services also weigh against a finding of a likelihood of confusion. Business management services and financial consulting services related to stock repurchases would be directed to sophisticated clients who would be well aware of the source of those services. A company looking for business management services would not look to a financial share repurchase consultant and vice versa. Determining which business management consultant or which financial share repurchase consultant to retain is not a decision that would be made lightly or impulsively. These services offered are complex, and the prospective purchaser of the services would carefully review the qualifications of the service provider and the information provided by them. This would offer a significant opportunity for the purchaser to investigate and understand the source of the services. The decision to engage the services would also be made by a sophisticated purchaser since one would need the proper training and experience to discern if the services offered would meet the needs. Thus, the nature of the services further support a finding that there would be no likelihood of confusion. In view of the amendment to the listing of services and remarks set forth above, Applicant respectfully requests that the refusal of registration be withdrawn, and the Application be moved toward publication. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class deleted) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class added) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 036 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Financial consulting services in the field of corporate share repurchases; providing financial counseling to businesses regarding the financial impacts associated with share repurchases; providing financial advising to companies as to timing share repurchases to enhance profitability | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | Anthony E. Bennett |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP |
STREET | 6900 JERICHO TURNPIKE |
CITY | SYOSSET |
STATE | New York |
POSTAL CODE | 11791 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 516-822-3550 |
FAX | 516-822-3582 |
aebdocket@hbiplaw.com | |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2777-4 |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Anthony E. Bennett |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP |
STREET | 6900 JERICHO TURNPIKE |
CITY | SYOSSET |
STATE | New York |
POSTAL CODE | 11791 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 516-822-3550 |
FAX | 516-822-3582 |
aebdocket@hbiplaw.com | |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2777-4 |
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY | James F. Harrington, Glenn T. Henneberger, Steven T. Zuschlag, John T. Gallagher, Celeste M. Butera, Wayne L. Ellenbogen, Susan A. Sipos, Alexander G. Vodovozov, Mark E. Baron, Kevin E. McDermott, Lauren T. Emr, Linda D. Chin, Ronald J. Baron, and Silvana M. Merlino, each of them of HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP, 6900 Jericho Turnpike, Syosset, NY 11791; and Daniel A. Scola, Jr., Salvatore J. Abbruzzese, Michael I. Chakansky, John S. Sopko, Andrea M. Wilkovich, Stephen J. Brown, Matthew J. Solow, Gie Yoon, and Leila K. Marcovici each of them of HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP, 4 Century Drive, Parsippany, NJ 07054-4406. |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | ANTHONY E. BENNETT |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | aebdocket@hbiplaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | NOT PROVIDED |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2777-4 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Anthony E. Bennett |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | aebdocket@hbiplaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | hbmail@hbiplaw.com |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 2777-4 |
PAYMENT SECTION | |
TOTAL FEES DUE | The filing Attorney has elected not to submit a fee payment for the class(es), believing no fee payment is required under the Trademark Rules of Practice. |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /anthony e. bennett/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Anthony E. Bennett |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, New York bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 516-822-3550 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/27/2020 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /anthony e. bennett/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Anthony E. Bennett |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, New York bar memeber |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 516-822-3550 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/27/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Fri Mar 27 16:01:58 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XXX.XX.XXX.XXX- 20200327160158767187-8839 6266-7107eae51d012738d422 2d149464d3f1313f4edf26fc0 98d351c62527139ffb92b-N/A -N/A-20200327155625379032 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
In the Office Action, registration has been refused under Section 2(d) in view of US Registration No. 4,070,825 for the mark VIBE. The registration is directed to a number of services including business management; consultancy, advisory and information services to the aforementioned services.
In order to more particularly define the Applicant’s services and address an objection to the identification of services, Applicant has amended the listing of services to read as follows:
Class 36:
Financial consulting services in the field of corporate share repurchases; providing financial counseling to businesses regarding the financial impacts associated with share repurchases; providing financial advising to companies as to timing share repurchases to enhance profitability
Applicant respectfully submits that the distinction between the amended listing of services as well as the nature of the services would prevent a finding of likelihood of confusion.
The cited registration is directed to business management and related advisory and consultancy. Such services relate to overseeing and supervising business operations including the day-to-day operations of a business. These services are not so broad as to cover financial consulting.
In contrast, the services of the present application are directed to financial consulting services in the field of corporate share repurchases and providing financial consulting to businesses regarding the impact associated with share repurchases. The services also include providing financial advising to companies as to timing share repurchases to enhance profitability. Financial consulting relating to corporate share buybacks is not related to business management services which are directed to the day-to-day operations of a business or supervising such operations. Such financial consulting as to stock repurchasing is not directed to managing the business operation of the company.
In addition, the services of financial consulting as to stock repurchases would typically be offered by different sources through different channels of trade than business management services. A financial consultant for stock buybacks would typically have different training and focus than one who is advising a company as to the operations of the business.
Applicant respectfully submits that the significant difference between the services weighs heavily against a finding of a likelihood of confusion between Applicant’s mark and that of the cited registration.
Moreover, the nature of the services also weigh against a finding of a likelihood of confusion. Business management services and financial consulting services related to stock repurchases would be directed to sophisticated clients who would be well aware of the source of those services. A company looking for business management services would not look to a financial share repurchase consultant and vice versa. Determining which business management consultant or which financial share repurchase consultant to retain is not a decision that would be made lightly or impulsively. These services offered are complex, and the prospective purchaser of the services would carefully review the qualifications of the service provider and the information provided by them. This would offer a significant opportunity for the purchaser to investigate and understand the source of the services. The decision to engage the services would also be made by a sophisticated purchaser since one would need the proper training and experience to discern if the services offered would meet the needs. Thus, the nature of the services further support a finding that there would be no likelihood of confusion.
In view of the amendment to the listing of services and remarks set forth above, Applicant respectfully requests that the refusal of registration be withdrawn, and the Application be moved toward publication.
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.