Suspension Letter

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

SUSPENSION NOTICE

No Response Required

 

 

Issue date:  December 30, 2019

 

 

Introduction.  This Suspension Notice is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Suspension Notice issued on June 14, 2019 in connection with this application.  The assigned trademark examining attorney inadvertently failed to indicate the status of the issues raised in the previous Office action dated May 3, 2019.  See TMEP §715.01.  The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the delay in indicating the status of the issues previously raised. 

 

The application is suspended for the reason specified below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq. 

 

Application suspended until submission of foreign registration or proof that foreign registration was renewed.  Applicant is required to provide a copy of a foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin; the foreign registration must be valid when the U.S. registration issues.  15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01(a).  Action on the application is suspended until the USPTO receives a copy of such foreign registration or proof that the foreign registration was renewed.  TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04.  Applicant must also provide an English translation if the foreign registration or renewal document is not in English.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii). 

 

If the foreign application abandons or the foreign registration is not renewed, applicant should promptly notify the trademark examining attorney.  See TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a).  In such case, applicant may amend the application to rely on another filing basis, if appropriate, and will retain the priority filing date, if applicable.  TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a).

 

Requirement satisfied.  The following requirement has been satisfied:  the requirement to clarify applicant’s entity type.  See TMEP §713.02. 

 

Requirements maintained and continued.  The following requirements are maintained and continued: 

 

·        Identification of goods amendment required

·        Multiple-class application requirements

·        Description of the mark amendment required

 

See id.  These requirements will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises.  See TMEP §716.01.

 

Identification of goods amendment required.  The wording “noble metal powder used in manufacturing” in the identification of goods for International Class 6 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  In particular, this wording could encompass “noble metal powder used in manufacturing, namely, of alloys of precious metals for dental purposes used in the manufacture of dental amalgams of gold” in Class 5, or “precious metals for use in manufacturing jewelry” in Class 14.  See attached evidence from Merriam-Webster.com defining “noble metal.”

 

Applicant must correct the punctuation in the identification to clarify the individual items in the list of goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01(a).  Proper punctuation in identifications is necessary to delineate explicitly each product or service within a list and to avoid ambiguity.  Commas, semicolons, and apostrophes are the only punctuation that should be used in an identification of goods.  TMEP §1402.01(a).  An applicant should not use colons, periods, exclamation points, and question marks in an identification.  Id.  In addition, applicants should not use symbols in the identification such as asterisks (*), at symbols (@), or carets.  Id.

 

In general, commas should be used in an identification (1) to separate a series of related items identified within a particular category of goods or services, (2) before and after “namely,” and (3) between each item in a list of goods or services following “namely” (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion, bar soap, shampoo).  Id.  Semicolons generally should be used to separate a series of distinct categories of goods or services within an international class (e.g., personal care products, namely, body lotion; deodorizers for pets; glass cleaners).  Id. 

 

Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (bolded text indicating suggested changes): 

 

In Class 6, Common metal in powder form; solder powder in the nature of common metal powders used in manufacturing; soft solder; hard solder

 

In Class 14, noble metal powder used in manufacturing in the nature of precious metals for use in manufacturing jewelry

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Applicant must also respond to the following requirement.

 

Multiple-class application requirements.  The application identifies goods that are classified in at least two classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only one class.  In a multiple-class application, a fee for each class is required.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2), (b)(2); TMEP §§810.01, 1403.01.

 

Therefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid, or (2) submit the fees for each additional class.

 

The fee for adding classes to a regular TEAS application is $400 per class when the fee is paid using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(ii); TMEP §§810, 1403.02(c).

 

Moreover, if applicant adds a class to the application, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 44:

 

(1)        List the goods by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)        Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). 

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 44 multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

Applicant must also respond to the following requirement.

 

Description of the mark amendment required.  Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark that matches the colors in the color claim.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(c).  The color claim includes the following colors:  green and grey.  However, the following colors appear in the description of the mark:  gray and green. 

 

Colors in the color claim, and description must match.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07 et seq. 

 

The following description of the mark is suggested, if accurate (bolded text indicating suggested change):

 

The mark consists of the stylized word "WELCO" in grey below a stylized, W-shaped zig-zag line in green.

 

Suspension process.  The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended.  See TMEP §716.04.  As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension.  TMEP §716.05. 

 

No response required.  Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so. 

 

 

/Joshua S. Toy/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 120

571-272-4856

joshua.toy@uspto.gov

 

 

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 30, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88378188

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.  No response is necessary.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

/Joshua S. Toy/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 120

571-272-4856

joshua.toy@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”