To: | SemiAutoArms LLC (semiautoarms@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88375596 - PURE - N/A |
Sent: | December 11, 2019 09:26:42 PM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88375596
Mark: PURE
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: SemiAutoArms LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
FINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 11, 2019
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on December 3, 2019.
In a previous Office action dated November 19, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on Trademark Act Section 1, 2 and 45 because the mark, as used of the specimen of record, fails to function as a trademark, and based on Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 because the specimen fails to show the applied-for mark in use in commerce with any of the good in the notice of allowance. The trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL these refusals. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.04.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL THAT APPLICANT MUST ADDRESS:
REFUSAL – FAILURE TO FUNCTION
Applicant did not address the refusal in its application, and indicated that it intended to abandon the application. Accordingly, there exists no basis upon which the refusal may be withdrawn, and the refusal is now made final.
REFUSAL – SPECIMEN FAILS TO SHOW MARK IN USE IN COMMERCE – PRINTER’S PROOF
The refusal to register is also made final because the specimen in International Class 013 is a printer’s proof and thus does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(a), (g)(i). Generally, printer’s proofs and internal design documents are preliminary copies of documents used internally to make corrections before publication or fabrication. Proofs and design illustrations are usually not disseminated to the public, and thus do not show use in commerce of the mark in connection with the identified goods. See 15 U.S.C. §1127; In re The Signal Cos., 228 USPQ 956, 957-58 n.4 (TTAB 1986); TMEP §§904.04(a), 904.07(a), 1301.04(a).
Applicant did not address the refusal in its application, and indicated that it intended to abandon the application. Accordingly, there exists no basis upon which the refusal may be withdrawn, and the refusal is now made final.
ADVISORY – TO EXPRESSLY ABANDON THE APPLICATION
In applicant’s response, applicant “requests abandonment” of the application. Applicant may immediately abandon as follows:
Applicant can expressly abandon the application (i.e., withdraw a pending application and end the application process) using the TEAS Request for Express Abandonment (Withdrawal) of Application form. This form must be properly signed by the applicant or, if represented by an authorized attorney, by the applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.68(a), 2.193(e)(2); TMEP §§611.03(b), 718.01. Once filed, a request for abandonment may not be withdrawn. 37 C.F.R. §2.68(a).
If applicant does nothing, the application will automatically abandon six months after the issuance of this office action. No action is required by applicant for abandonment to occur in this case.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a request for reconsideration of this final Office action that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals and/or click to file a timely appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with the required filing fee(s).
/Christina M. Riepel/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 124
(571) 272-6358
christina.riepel@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE