Offc Action Outgoing

CULTURE CLUB

Mothership Ventures, LLC

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88364994 - CULTURE CLUB - CULTURECLB-w

To: Mothership Ventures, LLC (vic@brandidentitylawyer.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88364994 - CULTURE CLUB - CULTURECLB-w
Sent: 6/12/2019 1:53:54 PM
Sent As: ECOM123@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  88364994

 

MARK: CULTURE CLUB

 

 

        

*88364994*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       VICTOR K SAPPHIRE, ESQ.

       LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR SAPPHIRE

       7190 SUNSET BLVD STE 116

       LOS ANGELES, CA 90046

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Mothership Ventures, LLC

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       CULTURECLB-w

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       vic@brandidentitylawyer.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/12/2019

 

 

ACTION ON MERITS AND SEARCH DEFERRED IN PART – INSUFFICIENT FEE FOR MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION

 

A review of the merits of the application is deferred, and a search of the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks is deferred in part, until applicant responds to this Office action by satisfying one of the following:

 

(1)       Specify the number of classes for which registration is sought and provide the filing fees for all such classes.

 

(2)       Delete class(es) from the application not covered by the fee(s) already submitted. 

 

See TMEP §§810.01, 1401.04. 

 

The application was filed online as a Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Reduced Fee (RF) application and therefore the filing fee per class was $275.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iii); TMEP §810.  The application identifies goods and services in at least six international classes, which require a total of fees in the amount of $1,650.  Applicant submitted $275 with the application.  The fee submitted was sufficient for only one international class. 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Because Applicant submitted a filing fee for one international class only, the referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney in International Class 009 only.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below, and submit the filing fee for the remaining international classes so that a complete examination can be conducted.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH RESULTS FOR INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009 ONLY:  The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration based on Applicant's goods in International Class 009 only under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

  • Amendment of Classification and Identification of Goods Required in International Class 009
  • Request for Additional Information About Wording in the Mark

 

 

AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRED IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 009

 

The identification of goods is unacceptable because it contains indefinite wording and must be clarified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Specifically, Applicant must clarify the nature of its "tapes", and specify its "downloadable audiovisual media".  Applicant should also exclude any extraneous information from the identification of goods, such as the international class number.

 

In addition, Applicant has classified “cellular phone accessory charms” in International Class 009; however, the proper classification is International Class 026.  Therefore, applicant may respond by (1) adding International Class 026 to the application and reclassifying these goods in the proper international class, (2) deleting "cellular phone accessory charms" from the application, or (3) deleting the remainder of the items in the identification and reclassifying the specified goods in the proper international class.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.86(a), 6.1; TMEP §§1403.02 et seq.  If applicant adds one or more international classes to the application, applicant must comply with the multiple-class requirements specified in this Office action.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate: 

 

International Class 009:  "Prerecorded audio and video tapes featuring music; pre-recorded compact discs and digital versatile discs featuring music; digital music downloadable from the internet; downloadable ring tones featuring music and voice messages for mobile phones; prerecorded audio and video discs, audio and video tapes, and downloadable audiovisual media in the nature of [specify nature of audiovisual media within this International Class, e.g., downloadable audiovisual recordings, CDs, DVDs] all featuring musical performances, music videos, music, dramatic and theatrical performances; carrying cases specially adapted for portable electronic devices, namely, mobile telephones, personal digital assistant devices and mobile computers; accessories in the nature of battery cases for portable electronic devices, namely, mobile telephones, personal digital assistant devices and mobile computers; accessories in the nature of cellular phone accessory charms and cell phone faceplates; downloadable game software applications for entertainment purposes for portable electronic devices; microphones; headphones, in Class 9;"

 

International Class 026:  "Accessories in the nature of cellular phone accessory charms"

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

 

Multiple Class Advisory

 

The application references goods and services based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class:

 

(1)       List the goods and services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  Specifically, the application identifies goods and services based on use in commerce that are classified in at least six international classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only one international class).  Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

(3)       Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class.  See more information about verified dates of use.

 

(4)       Submit a specimen for each international class.  The current specimen is acceptable for International Class 009; and applicant needs a specimen for International Class 026.  Please note action on the merits and search in all but the goods in International Class 009 has been deferred.  The specimens for other international classes may also be unacceptable upon completion of review.  See more information about specimens.

 

            Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  

 

            Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and website printouts that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  

 

(5)       Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application. See more information about verification.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

 

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT WORDING IN THE MARK

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must explain whether the wording in the mark “CULTURE”, "CLUB", and/or "CULTURE CLUB" has any significance in the music or entertainment trade or industry or as applied to applicant’s goods, or if such wording is a “term of art” within applicant’s industry.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.

 

 

PRACTICE ADVISORY

 

37 C.F.R. §2.193(f) - Signature as certification.

 

The presentation to the Office (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) of any document by any person, whether a practitioner or non-practitioner, constitutes a certification under §11.18(b) of this chapter.  Violations of §11.18(b) of this chapter may jeopardize the validity of the application or registration, and may result in the imposition of sanctions under §11.18(c) of this chapter.  Any practitioner violating §11.18(b) of this chapter may also be subject to disciplinary action.   See §§10.23(c)(15) [old rule] and 11.18(d) of this chapter.

 

37 C.F.R. §11.18 - Signature and certificate for correspondence filed in the Office.

 

(a) For all documents filed in the Office in patent, trademark, and other non-patent matters, and all documents filed with a hearing officer in a disciplinary proceeding, except for correspondence that is required to be signed by the applicant or party, each piece of correspondence filed by a practitioner in the Office must bear a signature, personally signed or inserted by such practitioner, in compliance with §1.4(d)(1), §1.4(d)(2), or §2.193(a) of this chapter.

 

(b) By presenting to the Office or hearing officer in a disciplinary proceeding (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) any paper, the party presenting such paper, whether a practitioner or non-practitioner, is certifying that—

 

(1) All statements made therein of the party’s own knowledge are true, all statements made therein on information and belief are believed to be true, and all statements made therein are made with the knowledge that whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the Office, knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or knowingly and willfully makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or knowingly and willfully makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be subject to the penalties set forth under 18 U.S.C. 1001  and any other applicable criminal statute, and violations of the provisions of this section may jeopardize the probative value of the paper; and

 

(2) To the best of the party’s knowledge, information and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,

 

(i) The paper is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass someone or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of any proceeding before the Office;

 

(ii) The other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;

 

(iii) The allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

 

(iv) The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence, or if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

 

(c) Violations of any of paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section are, after notice and reasonable opportunity to respond, subject to such sanctions or actions as deemed appropriate by the USPTO Director, which may include, but are not limited to, any combination of—

 

(1) Striking the offending paper;

 

(2) Referring a practitioner’s conduct to the Director of Enrollment and Discipline for appropriate action;

 

(3) Precluding a party or practitioner from submitting a paper, or presenting or contesting an issue;

 

(4) Affecting the weight given to the offending paper; or

 

(5) Terminating the proceedings in the Office.

 

(d) Any practitioner violating the provisions of this section may also be subject to disciplinary action.

 

 

If the applicant has any questions or requires assistance in responding to this Office Action, please contact the examining attorney at the contact information provided below.  Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

Yi, Crystal

/Crystal H. Yi/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 123

571.270.0763

crystal.yi@uspto.gov

 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88364994 - CULTURE CLUB - CULTURECLB-w

To: Mothership Ventures, LLC (vic@brandidentitylawyer.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88364994 - CULTURE CLUB - CULTURECLB-w
Sent: 6/12/2019 1:53:56 PM
Sent As: ECOM123@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 6/12/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88364994

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 6/12/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed