Offc Action Outgoing

SPINIT

Biosurfit, SA

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88361397 - SPINIT - 21573

To: Biosurfit, SA (ipdocketing@haynesboone.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88361397 - SPINIT - 21573
Sent: 6/17/2019 6:53:10 PM
Sent As: ECOM112@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  88361397

 

MARK: SPINIT

 

 

        

*88361397*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       DAVID A. BELL

       HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

       2323 VICTORY AVENUE, SUITE 700

       DALLAS, TX 75219

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Biosurfit, SA

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       21573

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       ipdocketing@haynesboone.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/17/2019

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

However, applicant must respond to the requirements set forth below.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

 

  • Identification of Goods – Partially Indefinite
  • Foreign Registration Certificate – Expiration
  • Foreign Registration Certificate – Mark Drawing
  • Unsigned Application

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO THE SPECIFIED GOODS ONLY

 

The wording “disposable microfludic cartridges for medical use” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the purpose or function of the goods is unspecified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  Applicant must amend the identification to specify the common commercial or generic name of the goods.  See TMEP §1402.01.  If the goods have no common commercial or generic name, applicant must describe the product, its main purpose, and its intended uses.  See id.

 

Further, the wording “parts and fittings” in the identification of goods in International Class 10 must be clarified because it is indefinite and too broad.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  This wording is indefinite because it does not make clear what the goods are.  Further, this wording could identify goods in more than one international class. 

 

However, while the word “parts and fittings” alone is generally unacceptable for the reasons identified above, the wording “replacement parts therefor” or “structural parts therefor” is acceptable when it follows a definite identification of goods.  See TMEP §1402.03(a).

 

For examples of acceptable identifications for parts, please see the USPTO’s U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual (ID Manual).

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate (please note that suggested amendments are in bold italics and suggested deletions are in strikethrough):

 

            International Class 5

 

“Diagnostic preparations for medical purposes; diagnostic preparations for medical and veterinary purposes; medical diagnostic reagents for in-vitro use.”

 

            International Class 10

 

“In-vitro diagnostic testing apparatus for testing blood and other bodily fluids and tissues; medical apparatus for diagnostic purposes for testing blood and other bodily fluids and tissues; apparatus for medical diagnostic purposes for testing blood and other bodily fluids and tissues; medical apparatus for performing in-vitro diagnostic tests for testing blood and other bodily fluids and tissues; biosensors for use in medical diagnostic tests of biological samples for detecting infectious diseases; testing apparatus for medical and diagnostic purposes for testing blood and other bodily fluids and tissues; disposable microfludic cartridges for __{indicate purpose} for medical use; test plates for use in medical diagnostic tests of biological samples; structural parts and fittings.”

 

Applicant’s goods may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS – ADVISORY

 

If the application identifies goods and/or services in more than one international class, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Sections 1(b) and 44:

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). 

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Sections 1(b) and 44 multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a).  See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.

 

FOREIGN REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED

 

The application specifies both a filing basis under Trademark Act Section 1 and reliance on a foreign registration(s) under Section 44(e).  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), (b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(1)-(3).  Although applicant submitted a copy of a foreign registration to satisfy the statutory requirements for the Section 44(e) basis, the foreign registration on which this application is based expired on May 22, 2019.  For an application filed under Section 44(e), the foreign registration must be in force at the time the United States issues a registration based on that foreign registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(iii); In re Societe D’Exploitation de la Marque Le Fouquet’s, 67 USPQ2d 1784, 1788-89 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §1004.01(a).

 

Therefore, applicant must provide a certificate of renewal or other certification from the intellectual property office of the foreign country or a copy of the foreign registration that shows that the foreign registration has been renewed and will be in force at the time the registration issues in the United States.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(iii); TMEP §1004.01(a).  If the certificate of renewal or other certification is not written in English, applicant must also provide an English translation.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(iii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b).  The translation should be signed by the translator.  See TMEP §1004.01(b).

 

Alternatively, applicant may rely on the Section 1 basis alone for obtaining a U.S. registration.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(1)-(2); TMEP §806.01(a), (b).  If applicant wants to rely solely on the Section 1 basis and not provide proof of renewal of the foreign registration, applicant can request deletion of the Section 44(e) basis.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.04. 

 

FOREIGN REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED

 

Applicant must clarify whether applicant’s mark is in standard characters or the equivalent.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §807.03(f), app. E.  The U.S. application includes a drawing showing the mark in what appear to be standard characters but applicant has claimed it to be a special form drawing that would cover only that particular rendition.  The foreign registration, however, includes a mark in block type or plain font and, even though the foreign registration does not specify whether the mark is in standard characters or special form format, could provide standard character protection or the equivalent.  A mark registered in standard characters would provide protection of a text mark in any lettering style, size, and color.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(a); TMEP §807.03(a). 

 

Applicant may respond by satisfying one of the following:

 

(1)       Confirm the applied-for mark is not in standard characters or the equivalent and that applicant intended to submit a special form drawing in the U.S. application.  Special form drawings must include an accurate and concise description of the literal and design elements in the mark.  If the U.S. application does not include a proper description, the following is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of the stylized wording “SPINIT”. 

 

(2)       Amend the application to claim standard characters in the U.S. application because the mark is in standard characters or the equivalent in the foreign registration.  To amend the application, applicant must provide the following two statements:

 

Under the law of the country of origin, the foreign application or registration includes a claim of standard characters (or the equivalent). 

 

The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color. 

 

See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(a)-(b), 2.61(b); TMEP §§807.03(a), (f), 808.02, 1011.01. 

 

UNSIGNED APPLICATION

 

The application was unsigned, resulting in the application not being properly verified.  See TMEP §804.  Applicant must properly sign and therefore verify the application in an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(n), 2.33(a), (b)(2)-(c), 2.34(a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (a)(4)(ii); TMEP §804.02. 

 

The following statements must be verified:  That applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; that applicant believes applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services specified in the application; that to the best of the signatory’s knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive; and that the facts set forth in the application are true.  37 C.F.R. §§2.33(b)(2), (c), 2.34(a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (a)(4)(ii).  For more information about this, see the Verified statement webpage.

 

To provide these verified statements.  After opening the correct TEAS response form, answer “yes” to wizard question #10, and follow the instructions within the form for signing.  In this case, the form will require two signatures:  one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section. 

 

ASSISTANCE

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

/Kim L. Parks/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Kimberly L. Parks

Law Office 112

571.272.6129

kimberly.parks@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88361397 - SPINIT - 21573

To: Biosurfit, SA (ipdocketing@haynesboone.com)
Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88361397 - SPINIT - 21573
Sent: 6/17/2019 6:53:12 PM
Sent As: ECOM112@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 6/17/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88361397

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 6/17/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed