Response to Office Action

VAPERX

BLUE, JOHN D.

Response to Office Action

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 88361111
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED LAW OFFICE 108
MARK SECTION
MARK FILE NAME http://uspto.report/TM/88361111/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT VAPERX
STANDARD CHARACTERS NO
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE NO
ARGUMENT(S)
Date: 01-24-2020 Attention: Lindsey H. Ben Trademark Examining Attorney Law Office 108 Phone: (571) 272-4239 Lindsey.Ben@uspto.gov Dear Examiner Ben, Please enter to record my response to the examiner?s Office Action, dated January 23, 2020, application serial #88361111; VapeRx?, as follows: SECTION 2(E)(1) REFUSAL ? MERELY DESCRIPTIVE ?Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes the intended use of applicant?s goods and a feature of those goods, namely, they are for use in oral vaporizers for smokers and contain prescription strength ingredients. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. ?1052(e)(1); see TMEP ??1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.? Applicants response: * The applicant disagrees. * The applicant is the present registered owner of the following Federal Registered ?Rx? similar marks: 1> CBDRx? / a Service Mark in Class #35. * Consulting services in the field of bringing together, for the HEALTH benefits of others, a variety of hemp-based goods enabling consumers to view and purchase the goods. * Registration #: 4670450. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 2> CBDRx? / a Trademark in Class #05. * Dietary and nutritional supplements containing CBD derived from Industrial Hemp. * Registration #: 5269540. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 3> HempRx? / a Trademark in Class #05. * Dietary and nutritional supplements containing industrial hemp. * Registration #: 4716423. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 4> MMJRx? / a Service Mark in Class #35. * Business consulting services in the field of Medical Marijuana and industrial hemp-based products; bringing together, for the health benefits of others, industrial hemp-based products thereby enabling consumers to be aware, view and purchase the goods. * Registration #: 4721868. Page 1 of 3 * Registered on the SUPPLEMENTAL register. * In addition, the applicant has several other ?Rx? related brand names that were registered. He has sold them in recent years. At this time, the applicant is not going to present a ?MERELY DESCRIPTIVE? rebuttal for this application. He wishes to simply amend this present application so as to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE * If the applicant was to present a rebuttal to ?MERELY DESCRIPTIVE? it would be as follows: The examiner asserts that applicant's mark "VAPERx? is merely descriptive as to the applied-for goods. Applicant respectfully traverses this contention and submits that applicant's mark is at most suggestive. - Applicant's mark, used in the applied-for goods, is at most suggestive. A suggestive mark is one for which ?a consumer must use imagination or any type of multistage reasoning to understand the mark?s significance, ? the mark does not describe the product?s features, but suggests them.? Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F. 3d 1135, 1142 (2002). A descriptive term is one that names a characteristic of a particular product or service, where the use of imagination is not needed to come to the conclusion as to the nature of the goods. H-D Michigan, Inc. v. Top Quality Service, Inc., 496 F.3d 755, 759 (2007); Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., 576 F.3d 221, 232 (2009). A consumer must employ thought, imagination, and deduction to arrive at the exact nature of applicant's services. Applicant's mark is therefore at most suggestive as to applicant's offered goods. Any doubt in the distinction between descriptiveness and suggestiveness must resolve in applicant's favor. To the extent the examining attorney finds applicant's mark to fall within the "gray area" between obviously descriptive marks, on the one hand, and suggestive marks on the other, all doubts must be resolved in Applicant's favor. In re Conductive Systems, Inc., 220 U.S.P.Q. 84, 86 (TTAB 1983) (where a single descriptive term creates a mark that might be either descriptive or suggestive, doubts are to be resolved in favor of applicants; refusal reversed); In re Pennwalt Corp., 173 U.S.P.Q. 317, 319 (TTAB 1972) (DRI-FOOT not merely descriptive for antiperspirant foot deodorant; doubts to be resolved in favor of publication; refusal reversed). Accordingly, the examining attorney should withdraw the refusal under Section 2(e) (1). Page 2 of 3 Here, applicant has raised enough doubt as to the descriptiveness of applicant's mark as applied to applicant's offered goods. Any doubt as to the descriptiveness of applicant's mark should be resolved in applicant's favor. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant wishes to simply amend his present application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER: ?The applied-for mark has been refused registration on the Principal Register. Applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration and/or by amending the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. See 15 U.S.C. ?1091; 37 C.F.R. ??2.47, 2.75(a); TMEP ??801.02(b), 816. Amending to the Supplemental Register does not preclude applicant from submitting evidence and arguments against the refusal(s). TMEP ?816.04.?? * Applicants response: The applicant herein accepts the examiners suggestion and wishes to amend his present application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS: ?The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified to specify that the ?CBD industrial hemp oil? is to be used as electronic cigarette liquid in order to clearly be in Class 34. See 37 C.F.R. ?2.32(a)(6); TMEP ?1402.01. Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate. The wording that appears in bold and/or italics below represents the suggested changes. Any wording that is crossed out represents matter that must be deleted from the identification.? International Class 34: CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges Applicants response: * The applicant agrees with the examiner and herein adopts the suggested description. The applicant believes he has responded to all of the examiner?s points. Therefore, his present application should be AMENDED to seek registration on the SUPPLEMENTAL Register. Thanks for your help with my application(s). Kindest regards, John D. Blue / applicant-owner * * * * * Page 3 of 3
EVIDENCE SECTION
        EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
       ORIGINAL PDF FILE evi_1-174237134194-20200125001453524711_._1st_response_VAPERx_.pdf
       CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
       (3 pages)
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\611\88361111\xml5\ROA0002.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\611\88361111\xml5\ROA0003.JPG
        \\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\611\88361111\xml5\ROA0004.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE 3 page PDF response to the office action
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (current)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 034
DESCRIPTION
CBD industrial hemp oil for electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
        FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 03/15/2019
        FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 03/15/2019
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (proposed)
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 034
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION
CBD industrial hemp oil for electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges
FINAL DESCRIPTION
CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges
FILING BASIS Section 1(a)
       FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE At least as early as 03/15/2019
       FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE At least as early as 03/15/2019
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE /john d. blue/
SIGNATORY'S NAME JOHN D. BLUE
SIGNATORY'S POSITION "OWNER"
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER 8138386437
DATE SIGNED 01/24/2020
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Sat Jan 25 00:25:20 EST 2020
TEAS STAMP USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
-20200125002520600694-883
61111-70091d27cf6f32f7896
c828785b556057799de991ef4
b987e29cfa3bfa525a1484d-N
/A-N/A-202001250014535247
11



Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011)
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88361111 VAPERX (Stylized and/or with Design, see http://uspto.report/TM/88361111/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:

Date: 01-24-2020 Attention: Lindsey H. Ben Trademark Examining Attorney Law Office 108 Phone: (571) 272-4239 Lindsey.Ben@uspto.gov Dear Examiner Ben, Please enter to record my response to the examiner?s Office Action, dated January 23, 2020, application serial #88361111; VapeRx?, as follows: SECTION 2(E)(1) REFUSAL ? MERELY DESCRIPTIVE ?Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes the intended use of applicant?s goods and a feature of those goods, namely, they are for use in oral vaporizers for smokers and contain prescription strength ingredients. Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. ?1052(e)(1); see TMEP ??1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq.? Applicants response: * The applicant disagrees. * The applicant is the present registered owner of the following Federal Registered ?Rx? similar marks: 1> CBDRx? / a Service Mark in Class #35. * Consulting services in the field of bringing together, for the HEALTH benefits of others, a variety of hemp-based goods enabling consumers to view and purchase the goods. * Registration #: 4670450. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 2> CBDRx? / a Trademark in Class #05. * Dietary and nutritional supplements containing CBD derived from Industrial Hemp. * Registration #: 5269540. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 3> HempRx? / a Trademark in Class #05. * Dietary and nutritional supplements containing industrial hemp. * Registration #: 4716423. * Registered on the PRINCIPAL register. 4> MMJRx? / a Service Mark in Class #35. * Business consulting services in the field of Medical Marijuana and industrial hemp-based products; bringing together, for the health benefits of others, industrial hemp-based products thereby enabling consumers to be aware, view and purchase the goods. * Registration #: 4721868. Page 1 of 3 * Registered on the SUPPLEMENTAL register. * In addition, the applicant has several other ?Rx? related brand names that were registered. He has sold them in recent years. At this time, the applicant is not going to present a ?MERELY DESCRIPTIVE? rebuttal for this application. He wishes to simply amend this present application so as to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE * If the applicant was to present a rebuttal to ?MERELY DESCRIPTIVE? it would be as follows: The examiner asserts that applicant's mark "VAPERx? is merely descriptive as to the applied-for goods. Applicant respectfully traverses this contention and submits that applicant's mark is at most suggestive. - Applicant's mark, used in the applied-for goods, is at most suggestive. A suggestive mark is one for which ?a consumer must use imagination or any type of multistage reasoning to understand the mark?s significance, ? the mark does not describe the product?s features, but suggests them.? Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F. 3d 1135, 1142 (2002). A descriptive term is one that names a characteristic of a particular product or service, where the use of imagination is not needed to come to the conclusion as to the nature of the goods. H-D Michigan, Inc. v. Top Quality Service, Inc., 496 F.3d 755, 759 (2007); Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc., 576 F.3d 221, 232 (2009). A consumer must employ thought, imagination, and deduction to arrive at the exact nature of applicant's services. Applicant's mark is therefore at most suggestive as to applicant's offered goods. Any doubt in the distinction between descriptiveness and suggestiveness must resolve in applicant's favor. To the extent the examining attorney finds applicant's mark to fall within the "gray area" between obviously descriptive marks, on the one hand, and suggestive marks on the other, all doubts must be resolved in Applicant's favor. In re Conductive Systems, Inc., 220 U.S.P.Q. 84, 86 (TTAB 1983) (where a single descriptive term creates a mark that might be either descriptive or suggestive, doubts are to be resolved in favor of applicants; refusal reversed); In re Pennwalt Corp., 173 U.S.P.Q. 317, 319 (TTAB 1972) (DRI-FOOT not merely descriptive for antiperspirant foot deodorant; doubts to be resolved in favor of publication; refusal reversed). Accordingly, the examining attorney should withdraw the refusal under Section 2(e) (1). Page 2 of 3 Here, applicant has raised enough doubt as to the descriptiveness of applicant's mark as applied to applicant's offered goods. Any doubt as to the descriptiveness of applicant's mark should be resolved in applicant's favor. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant wishes to simply amend his present application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER: ?The applied-for mark has been refused registration on the Principal Register. Applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration and/or by amending the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. See 15 U.S.C. ?1091; 37 C.F.R. ??2.47, 2.75(a); TMEP ??801.02(b), 816. Amending to the Supplemental Register does not preclude applicant from submitting evidence and arguments against the refusal(s). TMEP ?816.04.?? * Applicants response: The applicant herein accepts the examiners suggestion and wishes to amend his present application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS: ?The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified to specify that the ?CBD industrial hemp oil? is to be used as electronic cigarette liquid in order to clearly be in Class 34. See 37 C.F.R. ?2.32(a)(6); TMEP ?1402.01. Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate. The wording that appears in bold and/or italics below represents the suggested changes. Any wording that is crossed out represents matter that must be deleted from the identification.? International Class 34: CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges Applicants response: * The applicant agrees with the examiner and herein adopts the suggested description. The applicant believes he has responded to all of the examiner?s points. Therefore, his present application should be AMENDED to seek registration on the SUPPLEMENTAL Register. Thanks for your help with my application(s). Kindest regards, John D. Blue / applicant-owner * * * * * Page 3 of 3

EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of 3 page PDF response to the office action has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_1-174237134194-20200125001453524711_._1st_response_VAPERx_.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 3 pages)
Evidence-1
Evidence-2
Evidence-3

CLASSIFICATION AND LISTING OF GOODS/SERVICES

Applicant proposes to amend the following class of goods/services in the application:
Current: Class 034 for CBD industrial hemp oil for electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges
Original Filing Basis:
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 03/15/2019 and first used in commerce at least as early as 03/15/2019 , and is now in use in such commerce.

Proposed:
Tracked Text Description: CBD industrial hemp oil for electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridgesClass 034 for CBD industrial hemp oil for use as electronic cigarette liquid also containing a mixture of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorings and terpenes used all, or in part, to refill electronic cigarette cartridges
Filing Basis: Section 1(a), Use in Commerce: The applicant is using the mark in commerce, or the applicant's related company or licensee is using the mark in commerce, on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended. The mark was first used at least as early as 03/15/2019 and first used in commerce at least as early as 03/15/2019 , and is now in use in such commerce.
SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /john d. blue/     Date: 01/24/2020
Signatory's Name: JOHN D. BLUE
Signatory's Position: "OWNER"

Signatory's Phone Number: 8138386437

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is not represented by an authorized attorney, and that he/she is either: (1) the owner/holder ; or (2) a person or persons with legal authority to bind the owner/holder; and if he/she had previously been represented by an attorney in this matter, either he/she revoked their power of attorney by filing a signed revocation with the USPTO or the USPTO has granted this attorney's withdrawal request.

        
Serial Number: 88361111
Internet Transmission Date: Sat Jan 25 00:25:20 EST 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX-20200125002520
600694-88361111-70091d27cf6f32f7896c8287
85b556057799de991ef4b987e29cfa3bfa525a14
84d-N/A-N/A-20200125001453524711


Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]

Response to Office Action [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed