UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/17/2019

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES THAT APPLICANT MUST ADDRESS:

 

• Information about goods and services required
• Indefinite identification of goods and services
• Disclaimer required
• Explanation required as to significance of mark

 

NO CONFLICTING MARKS FOUND

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

However, applicant must respond to the following requirement(s) before registration can be granted.

 

INFORMATION ABOUT GOODS AND SERVICES REQUIRED

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit additional information about applicant’s goods and services.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  The requested information should include fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, and/or advertisements.  If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods and services of the same type, explaining how its own product or services will differ.  If the goods and services feature new technology and no information regarding competing goods and services is available, applicant must provide a detailed factual description of the goods and services.

 

Factual information about the goods must clearly indicate how they operate, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade.  Factual information about the services must clearly indicate what the services are and how they are rendered, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade.  Conclusory statements will not satisfy this requirement for information.

 

Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.  Merely stating that information about the goods and services is available on applicant’s website is an insufficient response and will not make the relevant information of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES

Applicant’s goods and services are identified as follows:

 

            Class 12:   On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems

 

            Class 39:   On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems

 

            Class 42:   On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems

 

Goods in International Class 12

The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the specific nature, purpose and use of the goods is unclear.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant must specify the field of use in which the goods are used or intended to be used, or the specific purpose of the goods.  See TMEP §1402.01. 

 

Services in International Classes 39 and 42

The identification of services is not acceptable because applicant has used the same language to describe services in more than one international class.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1401.05(c).  Specifically, the wording “On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems” appears in International Classes 39 and 42. 

 

Generally, identical language cannot be used to describe services in more than one international class.  TMEP §1401.05(c).  For the USPTO to determine the proper classification of applicant’s services, applicant must specify the purpose for which the service activity is rendered.  Id.  For example, “layout services” is unacceptable because it refers to services in more than one international class – layout services “for advertising purposes” are classified in International Class 35 and  “other than for advertising purposes” are classified in International Class 41 – and does not clearly indicate which would be the appropriate international class.  The following identifications, however, would be acceptable:  “layout services for advertising purposes” in International Class 35 and/or “layout services other than for advertising purposes” in International Class 41.  See TMEP §1401.05(c) for more information about this issue.

 

In this case, classification would be determined by the purpose of the activities applicant provides.  Thus, applicant must amend the identification to specify the purpose of applicant’s services using wording that is relevant to each designated international class.  See id. 

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods and services, if accurate [the examining attorney’s suggestions appear in bold, underlined text]:

 

            Class 12:   On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems, namely, unmanned aerial systems (UAS) comprised of drones, remote controls for drones, and remote control (RC) aircraft, other than toys,  and related software and manuals therefor sold as a unit

 

            Class 39:   Services relating to On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems, namely, {list specific services by common commercial or generic name, e.g., flight and air traffic control services for unmanned aerial systems (UAS), drones, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), GPS navigation services, providing information to third parties regarding air traffic navigation and control by means of a global computer information network}

 

            Class 42:   Services relating to On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems, namely, {list specific services by common commercial or generic name, e.g., technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting of computer software problems in the fields of drones, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS), remote-control (RC) aircraft}

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

ID Manual Online

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

DISCLAIMER REQUIRED

The applicant must insert a disclaimer of “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” in the application because this wording merely describes a feature and provider of applicant’s goods and services.  See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).

 

The Office can require an applicant to disclaim an unregistrable part of a mark consisting of particular wording, symbols, numbers, design elements or combinations thereof.  15 U.S.C. §1056(a).  Under Trademark Act Section 2(e), the Office can refuse registration of an entire mark if the entire mark is merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods.  15 U.S.C. §1052(e).  Thus, the Office may require an applicant to disclaim a portion of a mark that, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive, deceptively misdescriptive, primarily geographically descriptive, or otherwise unregistrable (e.g., generic).  See TMEP §§1213, 1213.03. 

 

Failure to comply with a disclaimer requirement can result in a refusal to register the entire mark.  TMEP §1213.01(b).

 

A “disclaimer” is a statement that applicant does not claim exclusive rights to an unregistrable component of a mark.  TMEP§1213.  A disclaimer does not affect the appearance of the applied-for mark.  See TMEP§1213.10. 

 

Wording is merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the specified goods and/or services.  TMEP §1209.01(b); see In re Steelbuilding.com, 415 F.3d 1293, 1297, 75 USPQ2d 1420, 1421 (Fed. Cir. 2005); In re Gyulay, 820 F.2d 1216, 1217-18, 3 USPQ2d 1009, 1010 (Fed. Cir. 1987). 

 

In this case, applicant’s mark is SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP (SAAS) for “On Demand Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Systems.”  The term “SMART” is defined as “operating as if by human intelligence by using automatic computer control.”  http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/hcengdict/smart/0.  The term “AIRPORT” refers to “[a] place where aircraft take off and land, usually equipped with hard-surfaced landing strips, a control tower, hangars, aircraft maintenance and refueling facilities, and accommodations for passengers and cargo.”  http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=airport.  The word “AVIATION” is defined as “[t]he operation of aircraft.”  http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=aviation.  The term “PARTNERSHIP” is defined as “[a] relationship between individuals or groups that is characterized by mutual cooperation and responsibility, as for the achievement of a specified goal: Neighborhood groups formed a partnership to fight crime.”  http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=partnership.  When considered in relation to the identified goods and services, the wording “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” merely describes a feature and provider of the goods and services.  That is, applicant’s unmanned aerial systems and related services are provided by/through an airport and aviation partnership featuring automated technology. 

 

Thus, the wording “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” is descriptive as applied to applicant’s goods and services and must be disclaimed.

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” apart from the mark as shown.

 

TMEP §1213.08(a)(i); see In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493, 494 (Comm’r Pats. 1983).

 

EXPLANATION OF MARK’S SIGNIFICANCE REQUIRED

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must provide all the following information:

 

(1)  Explain whether the wording in the mark “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” has any meaning or significance in the trade or industry in which applicant’s goods and/or services are manufactured or provided, any meaning or significance as applied to applicant’s goods and/or services, or if such wording is a term of art within applicant’s industry. 

 

(2)  Explain whether the wording in the mark “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” identifies a geographic place. 

 

(3)  Respond to the following questions: 

 

      What does the wording “SMART AIRPORT AND AVIATION PARTNERSHIP” mean, refer to, or signify as applied to the goods and services listed in the application?

 

      What is a “smart airport”?

 

      What is “smart aviation”?

 

See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  

 

Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.

 

GUIDELINES FOR RESPONDING TO THIS OFFICE ACTION

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

/Amy L. Kertgate/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

Tel: (571) 272-1943

Email: amy.kertgate@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 6/17/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88358766

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed.  The trademark examining attorney assigned by the USPTO to your application has written an official letter to which you must respond.  Please follow these steps:

 

(1)  Read the LETTER by clicking on this link or going to http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/, entering your U.S. application serial number, and clicking on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification. 

 

(2)  Respond within 6 months (or sooner if specified in the Office action), calculated from 6/17/2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  A response transmitted through TEAS must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions. 

 

(3)  Questions about the contents of the Office action itself should be directed to the trademark examining attorney who reviewed your application, identified below. 

 

/Amy L. Kertgate/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

Tel: (571) 272-1943

Email: amy.kertgate@uspto.gov

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp. 

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.