| To: | Branson, Michael T (mtbranson@gmail.com) |
| Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88357834 - SUM - N/A |
| Sent: | January 07, 2020 07:30:51 AM |
| Sent As: | ecom120@uspto.gov |
| Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
|
U.S. Application Serial No. 88357834
Mark: SUM
|
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
|
Applicant: Branson, Michael T
|
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: January 07, 2020
This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on May 30, 2019 in connection with this application. Based on information and/or documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new requirement: information about the specimen required. See TMEP §§706, 711.02.
In a previous Office action dated May 30, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following: Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 for failure to show the applied-for mark in use in commerce with any of the specified goods in Class 25. In addition, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirement: amend the identification of goods and services, clarify the mark description.
Applicant was advised that Application No. 88346275 posed a potential bar to registration. Applicant has claimed ownership of the application and Application No. 88346275 no longer poses a potential bar to registration. The record has been updated to reflect the registration of Application No. 88346275.
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
• Specimen Refusal – Partial Refusal
• Information About Specimen Required
• Identification of Goods and Services – Amendment Required
• Multiple Class Application Requirements
• Mark Description Amendment Required
Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous May 30, 2019 Office action, within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02. If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
SPECIMEN REFUSAL – PARTIAL REFUSAL
THIS PARTIAL REFUSAL APPLIES TO CLASS 25 ONLY.
Applicant was previously refused registration in International Class 25 because the specimen did not show an association between the mark and clothing goods in Class 25. Response options for overcoming that refusal, if any, were set forth in the prior Office action. Applicant, however, responded to such refusal by submitting a substitute specimen for each refused international class that does not show proper use of the applied-for mark in commerce for the reasons immediately stated below. Thus, the refusal to register the applied-for mark in International Class 25 is MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED because applicant failed to provide evidence of use of the mark in commerce. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a), 2.63(b); TMEP §§904, 904.07, 1301.04(g)(i).
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). “Use in commerce” means (1) a bona fide use of the applied-for mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is placed in any manner on the goods, packaging, tags or labels affixed to the goods, or displays that directly associate the mark with the goods and have a point-of-sale nature, and (3) the goods are actually sold or transported in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1127.
An image of a product or packaging that has been digitally created or otherwise altered to include the mark does not show actual use of the mark in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §§904.04(a), 904.07(a); cf. In re Chica, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (TTAB 2007) (holding that “a mere drawing of the goods with an illustration of how the mark may be displayed” was not an acceptable specimen because it did not show actual use in commerce); In re The Signal Cos., 228 USPQ 956, 957-58 n.4 (TTAB 1986) (noting that a printer’s proof of an advertisement would not be an acceptable specimen because it does not show actual use in commerce).
In this case, the resolution or sharpness of the mark is different than the remaining features of the product and appears to be superimposed on the specimen. Also, the mark on the product has an incongruous border that indicates the mark was digitally superimposed on the specimen. Therefore, the submitted specimen cannot be accepted.
Additional information/documentation required. To permit proper examination of the application record for compliance with use in commerce requirements, applicant must respond to the following requests for information and documentation about the specimen(s). See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814. Answer for each specimen/photograph/image previously provided. For any website source submitted as supporting evidence, provide a digital copy of the entire webpage from top to bottom, as rendered in an Internet browser, that includes the URL and access or print date. TMEP §710.01(b) (citing In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1733 (TTAB 2018)).
(1) Identify the particular good(s) listed in the application for which the specimen(s) was submitted to show use of the mark.
(2) Was the specimen created for submission with this application? If so, specify the date each specimen was created. If applicant obtained the image(s) of the goods shown in the specimen(s) from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.
(3) Provide information about and examples of how applicant’s goods appear in the actual sales environment.
(a) If sold in stores, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the stores and of photographs showing the goods for sale in the named stores, such as photographs of the sales displays or goods on shelves with the mark.
(b) If sold online, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the online retailers, the website URL(s) for each named retailer, and a digital copy of the webpages showing the goods for sale on the named website.
(c) If sold in another type of sales environment (e.g., catalogs, trade shows), identify the environment and provide photographs and/or documentation showing the goods for sale in that environment.
(4) If the information in question (3) about how the goods appear in the actual sales environment is not available to applicant, please describe how applicant’s goods are sold or transported and provide photographs and other documentation showing how applicant’s mark appears on the goods and/or its packaging when the goods are sold or transported to or within the United States.
(5) For each category of sales environment specified in response to questions (3) and (4), specify when the goods bearing the mark were first available for purchase within the United States, the date of the first sale of the goods to or within the United States, and whether the goods are still for sale to or within the United States in that environment.
(6) For the goods identified in response to question (1), specify the dollar amount of sales with or within the United States and provide at least three invoices or other supporting documentation that show payments or other consideration made, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.
Response options. Applicant may respond to the refusal of registration due to the specimen’s failure to show actual use in commerce by amending the filing basis to allege intent to use the mark in commerce, for which no specimen is required now. See 37 C.F.R. §2.34. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a specimen.
Alternatively, applicant may also respond to the refusal by submitting a different specimen (a “verified substitute specimen”) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.
For an overview of these response options and instructions on how to satisfy either option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.
If applicant submits a verified substitute specimen, applicant must also fully respond to all the requirements for information and documentation. Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Merely stating that evidence is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional information or materials of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004). However, amending the application filing basis to intent-to-use under Section 1(b) will resolve the requirements for information and documentation.
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES – AMENDMENT REQUIRED
The requirement to amend the identification of goods and services in MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED.
Applicant must clarify the wording “rehabilitation” in the identification of goods in International Class 44 because it is indefinite and too broad. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. This wording is indefinite because it does not make clear what the services are. Rehabilitation could refer to physical rehabilitation or rehabilitation of alcohol addicted patients. Further, this wording could identify goods in more than one international class. For example, “physical rehabilitation” is in International Class 44 and “spiritual rehabilitation” is in International Class 45.
The wording “exercise therapy” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear what the services are. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must further specify the nature of the services.
The wording “sports health care” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear what the services are. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. For instance, this wording could refer to athletic training, or physiotherapy provided to athletes.
The wording “med spa” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear what the services are. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must further specify the nature of the services.
The wording “skin care” in the identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because it is unclear what the services are. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Applicant must further specify the nature of the services. For instance, this wording could refer to “cosmetic skin care services” or “medical skin care services.”
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
Class 25: Outerwear, namely, shirts, pants, sweaters, jackets, coats, jogging outfits, socks, gloves, shoes, sneakers, hats, visors being headwear, bandanas, belts and scarves
Class 41: Fitness boot camps; Health clubs for physical exercise; Conducting fitness classes; Consulting services in the fields of fitness and exercise; Counseling services in the field of physical fitness; Educational services, namely, providing cognitive fitness programs for seniors; Golf fitness instruction; Personal fitness training services; Personal fitness training services and consultancy; Physical fitness assessment services; Physical fitness conditioning classes; Physical fitness consultation; Physical fitness instruction; Physical fitness training of individuals and groups; Physical fitness training services; Providing a web site featuring information on exercise and fitness; Providing a website featuring information on exercise and fit
Class 44: Health care services, namely, physical therapy, physiotherapy, athletic training, chiropractic, exercise therapy being physical rehabilitation services through use of exercise, physical rehabilitation, sports health care in the nature of athletic training, massage, acupuncture, cosmetic skin care services; medical spa services, namely, minimally and non-invasive cosmetic and body fitness therapies
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
The application references goods and/or services based on use in commerce in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class:
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). Specifically, the application identifies goods and/or services based on use in commerce that are classified in at least 5 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 3 classes. Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
(3) Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class. See more information about verified dates of use.
(4) Submit a specimen for each international class. The current specimen is acceptable for classes 41 and 44; and applicant needs a specimen for all other classes. See more information about specimens.
Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.
Examples of specimens for services include advertising and marketing materials, brochures, photographs of business signage and billboards, and website printouts that show the mark used in the actual sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.
(5) Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application.” See more information about verification.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP §§904, 1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Plus application through TEAS is $225 per class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1)(iv); TMEP §§819.03, 819.04. See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS Plus fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.
MARK DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT REQUIRED
The requirement to amend the mark description is MAINTAINED AND CONTINUED.
The following description is suggested, if accurate: The mark consists of the word “SUM” with a double bar over the “U” resembling an equal sign.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
RECOMMEND PRO SE APPLICANT OBTAIN COUNSEL
Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines of the trademark application process, applicant may wish to hire a private attorney who specializes in trademark matters to assist in the process. The assigned trademark examining attorney can provide only limited assistance explaining the content of an Office action and the application process. USPTO staff cannot provide legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights. TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
/Sarah E. Steinpfad/
Sarah E. Steinpfad
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 120
571-270-3089
Sarah.steinpfad@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE