Offc Action Outgoing

STRANDSMART

StrandSmart, Inc.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88355281 - STRANDSMART - Davies - 11

To: StrandSmart, Inc. (vandyke@acm.org)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88355281 - STRANDSMART - Davies - 11
Sent: December 17, 2019 02:10:55 PM
Sent As: ecom116@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88355281

 

Mark:  STRANDSMART

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Raymond Van Dyke

VAN DYKE LAW

WASHINGTON SQUARE, PO BOX 65302

1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20035

 

 

Applicant:  StrandSmart, Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. Davies - 11

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 vandyke@acm.org

 

 

 

FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  December 17, 2019

 

 

This Office action is in response to applicant’s communications filed on December 4, 2019.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES IN PRIOR ACTION:

·       Requirement for Acceptable Identification and Classification of Goods

·       Requirement to Comply With Multiple-Class Application Requirements

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL:

·       Requirement for Acceptable Identification and Classification of Goods

 

37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)

 

SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN SATISFIED:

  • Requirement to Comply With Multiple-Class Application Requirements

 

FINAL REQUIREMENT FOR ACCEPTABLE IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS

 

The amended identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant must amend the identification to specify the common commercial or generic name of the goods.  See TMEP §1402.01.  If the goods have no common commercial or generic name, applicant must describe the product, its main purpose, and its intended uses.  See id.  Additionally, some of the goods may be classified incorrectly;  applicant must amend the application to properly classify all goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7), 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a), 1401.03(b).

 

The Trademark Act requires that a trademark or service mark application must include a “specification of … the goods [or services]” in connection with which the mark is being used or will be used.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(2) (emphasis added), (b)(2) (emphasis added); see 15 U.S.C. §1053.  Specifically, a complete application must include a “list of the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses or intends to use the mark.”  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6) (emphasis added).  This requirement for a specification of the particular goods and/or services applies to applications filed under all statutory bases.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)(2), 1051(b)(2), 1053, 1126(d)-(e), 1141f; 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(b)-(c).

 

Specifically, the following wording is unacceptable and/or misclassified:

 

Class 5

 

Diagnostic testing devices, namely diagnostic kits for testing blood samples for cancers, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer – This wording must be amended to indicate what the kits are comprised of, as well as indicating the specific use of the goods.  Such goods must be properly classified.  For example, “diagnostic kits comprised of medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing of blood for use in detection of cancer” or “comprised of medical diagnostic test strips for testing of blood for use in detection of cancer” would be in class 5, while “diagnostic kits consisting primarily of apparatus for taking blood samples” or “blood sampling tubes” would be in class 10. 

 

Class 10

 

Medical devices, namely diagnostic kits for detecting cancers in blood samples, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer – Again, this wording must be amended to indicate what the goods are comprised of and how they are used.  Noting also that the wording must be properly classified as indicated above. 

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification and classification, noting that the wording which should be deleted is in strikethrough, while newly-added wording is in bold, and appropriate wording should be provided by applicant where a “blank space” is indicated:

 

            Class 5:

Diagnostic testing devices, namely diagnostic kits comprised of medical diagnostic reagents and assays for testing blood samples for detection of cancers, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer; Medical devices, namely diagnostic kits comprised of medical diagnostic test strips for testing of blood for detecting cancers in blood samples, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer

 

Class 10:

Medical devices, namely diagnostic kits consisting primarily of apparatus for taking blood samples for detecting cancers in blood samples, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer; Diagnostic testing devices, namely diagnostic kits comprised of blood sampling tubes for testing blood samples for detection of cancers, specifically breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer

 

In the identification of goods, applicant must use the common commercial or generic names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible, and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  TMEP §1402.03(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6).  If applicant uses indefinite words such as “apparatus,” “components,” “devices,” “materials,” or “parts,” such wording must be followed by “namely,” and a list of each specific product identified by its common commercial or generic name.  See TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.03(a).

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

This requirement is made FINAL.

 

RESPONDING TO A FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

Please see the link below for responding to this final Office action, including filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). 

 

Additional response guidance information is provided below the signature line.

 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a request for reconsideration of this final Office action that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals and/or click to file a timely appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with the required filing fee(s).

 

 

/Susan K. Lawrence/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 116, USPTO

(571) 272-9186

sue.lawrence@uspto.gov

(informal communication only)

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88355281 - STRANDSMART - Davies - 11

To: StrandSmart, Inc. (vandyke@acm.org)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88355281 - STRANDSMART - Davies - 11
Sent: December 17, 2019 02:10:56 PM
Sent As: ecom116@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 17, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88355281

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Susan K. Lawrence/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 116, USPTO

(571) 272-9186

sue.lawrence@uspto.gov

(informal communication only)

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from December 17, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed