Notation to File

GP

Gregory Poole Equipment Company

RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP   Perfect.  Thank you.   From: Keeley, Alison [mailto:Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:28 AM To: Stevens, Eric <EStevens@poynerspruill.com> Subject: RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP   Dear Mr. Stevens,   I will send a Examiner’s Amendment/Priority Action, leaving Class 38 inactive, so you can pay the fee in the Response.   Please let me know if you have any questions.   Thank you, Alison Keeley                                                                    /Alison Keeley/                                                                 Trademark Examining Attorney                                                                 Law Office 113                                                                 Alison.Keeley@uspto.gov                                                                 (571) 272-4514     Please note: All relevant e-mail communications may be uploaded to the official application record in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.191 and TMEP §§709.04 - .05.       From: Stevens, Eric [mailto:EStevens@poynerspruill.com] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 9:03 AM To: Keeley, Alison <Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV> Subject: RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP   Good morning Ms. Keeley,   Thank you for your email regarding the above-referenced application.  My client agrees to your proposed amended identification for each class set forth in your email, including the proposed added Class 39.  We will arrange for payment of the additional fee for the Class 39 services.   Will you send a Priority Action or something to that effect so we can pay the fee in a response?   Thank you.   Eric P. Stevens | Partner 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601 PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801 D: 919 783 1017  |  M: 919 455 5635   estevens@poynerspruill.com | www.poynerspruill.com            From: Keeley, Alison [mailto:Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 10:22 AM To: Stevens, Eric <EStevens@poynerspruill.com> Subject: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP   This email is intended for Eric Stevens and/or any other authorized attorney.   Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP   Dear Mr. Stevens,   I am the trademark examiner assigned to this application.  I have reviewed the application and have identified some issues that can potentially be resolved by Examiner’s Amendment.  The specific issues are set forth below.   Identification   The wording in Class 35 contains “Retail dealerships featuring heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, …, buses; and trailers”. The use of the semicolon here creates an ambiguity because semicolons are generally used on separate identifications, and so it is not clear if the trailers are simply another good featured in the dealership or are a separate good (which would be a Class 12 good).  I would propose amending the semicolon to a comma.

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88354574

DATE:                                06/10/2019

NAME:                               akeeley

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

 

 

From: Stevens, Eric [mailto:EStevens@poynerspruill.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:29 AM
To: Keeley, Alison <Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP

 

Perfect.  Thank you.

 

From: Keeley, Alison [mailto:Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 11:28 AM
To: Stevens, Eric <
EStevens@poynerspruill.com>
Subject: RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP

 

Dear Mr. Stevens,

 

I will send a Examiner’s Amendment/Priority Action, leaving Class 38 inactive, so you can pay the fee in the Response.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Thank you,

Alison Keeley

 

 

                                                               /Alison Keeley/

                                                                Trademark Examining Attorney

                                                                Law Office 113

                                                                Alison.Keeley@uspto.gov

                                                                (571) 272-4514

 

 

Please note: All relevant e-mail communications may be uploaded to the official application record in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.191 and TMEP §§709.04 - .05.

 

 

 

From: Stevens, Eric [mailto:EStevens@poynerspruill.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 9:03 AM
To: Keeley, Alison <
Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: RE: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP

 

Good morning Ms. Keeley,

 

Thank you for your email regarding the above-referenced application.  My client agrees to your proposed amended identification for each class set forth in your email, including the proposed added Class 39.  We will arrange for payment of the additional fee for the Class 39 services.   Will you send a Priority Action or something to that effect so we can pay the fee in a response?

 

Thank you.

 

Eric P. Stevens | Partner

301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1900, Raleigh, NC 27601

PO Box 1801, Raleigh NC 27602-1801

D: 919 783 1017  |  M: 919 455 5635

 

estevens@poynerspruill.com | www.poynerspruill.com

        

 

From: Keeley, Alison [mailto:Alison.Keeley@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 10:22 AM
To: Stevens, Eric <
EStevens@poynerspruill.com>
Subject: Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP

 

This email is intended for Eric Stevens and/or any other authorized attorney.

 

Trademark Application No. 88354574 GP

 

Dear Mr. Stevens,

 

I am the trademark examiner assigned to this application.  I have reviewed the application and have identified some issues that can potentially be resolved by Examiner’s Amendment.  The specific issues are set forth below.

 

Identification

 

The wording in Class 35 contains “Retail dealerships featuring heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, …, buses; and trailers”. The use of the semicolon here creates an ambiguity because semicolons are generally used on separate identifications, and so it is not clear if the trailers are simply another good featured in the dealership or are a separate good (which would be a Class 12 good).  I would propose amending the semicolon to a comma.

 

The wording “Leasing of heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, mining, earth and materials handling and moving, road building and paving, construction of utilities, pipe laying, and timber harvesting, power operated forklifts and other lifting and moving equipment, floor cleaning machines, road sweeping machines” is overly-broad and indefinite.  Specifically, the leasing of machines is classified based on the function of the machine.

 

However, here, the identification includes rental of “power operated forklifts and other lifting and moving equipment which is a Class 39 service, “timber harvesting”, a Class 40 service, and the vague wording “earth and materials handling and moving”. Which includes “earth moving”, a class 37 service, but also “materials handling”, which could include materials treatment equipment in Class 40.  Therefore, this wording must be clarified.  As this potentially includes wording outside of the identified Classes, if I send an Office Action, I will also require Clarification as to the number of Classes.  If you wish to add Class 39, an additional fee will be required.

 

The wording “Leasing of waste handling equipment” in Class 40 is also overly-broad and indefinite because “waste handling equipment” could encompass functions such as “waste treatment” in Class 40, but also “waste transportation” in Class 39.  Again, this must be clarified, and if wording is added in Class 39, an additional fee will be required.

 

The following amended Identification is suggested, if accurate (this proposed Amendment does not include adding additional Classes, but Class 39 may be added as discussed above.  I can add the class and keep it inactive pending the payment of the relevant fee).

 

Class 35:              Retail dealerships featuring heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, mining, earth and materials handling and moving, road building and paving, agriculture, utilities, waste handling, pipe laying, and timber harvesting, power operated forklifts and other lifting and moving equipment, floor cleaning machines, road sweeping machines, diesel and electric generators, switchgears, marine vessel engines, on-highway trucks, buses, and trailers

 

Class 37:              Repair and maintenance of heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, mining, earth and materials handling and moving, road building and paving, agriculture, utilities, waste handling, pipe laying, and timber harvesting, power operated forklifts and other lifting and moving equipment, floor cleaning machines, road sweeping machines, diesel and electric generators, switchgears, marine vessel engines, on-highway trucks, buses, and trailers; Leasing of heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in building construction, mining, earth and materials handling and moving, road building and paving, construction of utilities, pipe laying, and timber harvesting, power operated forklifts and other lifting and moving equipment, floor cleaning machines, and road sweeping machines

 

Class 40:              Leasing of waste handling equipment in the nature of machines for waste treatment; leasing of diesel powered electric generators and switchgears for the production of electricity; Leasing of heavy equipment and industrial equipment for use in timber harvesting

 

Additionally, if Class 39 is added, the following may be added:

 

Class 39:              Leasing of forklifts and moving equipment, namely, pads, straps, hitches, dollies, boxes, carriers, and hand trucks

 

Please let me know by phone or email if this is acceptable or if you have any questions.

 

Thank you,

Alison Keeley

 

 

 

 

 

                                                               /Alison Keeley/

                                                                Trademark Examining Attorney

                                                                Law Office 113

                                                                Alison.Keeley@uspto.gov

                                                                (571) 272-4514

 

 

Please note: All relevant e-mail communications may be uploaded to the official application record in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.191 and TMEP §§709.04 - .05.

 

 

*********

This message constitutes a confidential attorney-client communication. If you have received this communication in error, do not read it. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. Please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply email or by calling 919-783-6400, so that our address record can be corrected. Thank you.

 

*********

This message constitutes a confidential attorney-client communication. If you have received this communication in error, do not read it. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. Please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply email or by calling 919-783-6400, so that our address record can be corrected. Thank you.


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed