To: | Plantronics, Inc. (trademarks@fleckman.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88343349 - PPP POLY - 6199-322US |
Sent: | September 05, 2019 10:29:49 AM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88343349
Mark: PPP POLY
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Plantronics, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 6199-322US
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: September 05, 2019
This Suspension Notice is in response to applicant’s Response to Office Action, dated August 12, 2019.
In the previous Office Action, dated May 15, 2019, the examining attorney:
· Refused registration pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act due to a Likelihood of Confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 5513249;
· Advised applicant of a Potential Likelihood of Confusion with the marks in U.S. Application Serial Nos. 87251648 and 87753178;
· Required Amendments to the Identification of Services; and
· Required Amendments to the Mark Description.
In the Response, applicant:
· Provided arguments against the Section 2(d) Refusal;
· Provided arguments against the Potential Section 2(d) Refusal;
· Amended the Identification of Services; and
· Amended the Mark Description.
The examining attorney has reviewed the Response and has determined the following:
· The application is suspended pending disposition of the Prior Pending Applications.
· Applicant’s arguments against the Section 2(d) Refusal are not persuasive. Therefore, the Section 2(d) Refusal is maintained and continued.
· The Requirement to amend the Identification is satisfied.
· The Requirement to amend the Mark Description is satisfied.
SUSPENSION NOTICE
The application is suspended for the reason specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending applications below have an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the marks in the applications below register, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered marks. 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed applications below either register or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the applications below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial Nos. 87251648 and 87753178
Refusals and requirements resolved and maintained and continued. The following requirements are satisfied:
• Identification of Services Amendments Required
• Mark Description Amendments Required
See TMEP §713.02.
The following refusal is maintained and continued:
• Section 2(d) Refusal
See id. This refusal will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Alison Keeley/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 113
(571) 272-4514
Alison.Keeley@uspto.gov