Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88336715 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 112 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88336715/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | 4MEDICA BIG DATA MPI |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
RESPONSE This is in response to the Office Action dated May 23, 2019, in connection with the above-identified application. Reconsideration of this application is respectfully requested in view of the following remarks.
REMARKS
In the Office Action, the Examining Attorney requested a disclaimer of the phrase BIG DATA MPI on the grounds that it is not inherently distinctive. Applicant respectfully disagrees with the Examiner’s assertion. However, in an effort to expedite prosecution of its application, Applicant hereby submits a claim of acquired distinctiveness as to the BIG DATA MPI part of the mark in accordance with Section 2(f) of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(f). The Applicant has used the BIG DATA MPI part of the mark in commerce in connection with the identical services specified in the application for at least the last five years. The phrase BIG DATA MPI has become distinctive of the services through the Applicant’s exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement. The Declaration of Gregory Church, President for Applicant, verifying this statement, is submitted herewith. CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, and since the Examining Attorney has found no similar registered or pending mark that would bar registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Applicant respectfully requests that the application be approved for publication. An early publication date is respectfully requested.
|
|
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION | |
SECTION 2(f) Claim of Acquired Distinctiveness, IN PART, based on Five or More Years' Use | BIG DATA MPI has become distinctive of the goods/services through the applicant's substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement. |
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |
NAME | Gina Durham |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | DLA Piper LLP (US) |
STREET | P.O. Box 64807 |
CITY | Chicago |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60664-0807 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 312.368.4000 |
FAX | 312.236.7516 |
ch.tm@dlapiper.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 425437-4 |
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Gina Durham |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | DLA Piper LLP (US) |
STREET | P.O. Box 64807 |
CITY | Chicago |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60664-0807 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 312.368.4000 |
FAX | 312.236.7516 |
ch.tm@dlapiper.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 425437-4 |
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY | Keith Medansky, Hilary H. Remijas, Michael A. Geller, Nicole A. Chaudhari and Eugenia Schontag |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |
NAME | Gina Durham |
FIRM NAME | DLA Piper LLP (US) |
STREET | P.O. Box 64807 |
CITY | Chicago |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60664-0807 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 312.368.4000 |
FAX | 312.236.7516 |
ch.tm@dlapiper.com; nicole.chaudhari@dlapiper.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 425437-4 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Gina Durham |
FIRM NAME | DLA Piper LLP (US) |
STREET | P.O. Box 64807 |
CITY | Chicago |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60664-0807 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 312.368.4000 |
FAX | 312.236.7516 |
ch.tm@dlapiper.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 425437-4 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /Gregory Church/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Gregory Church |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | President |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 5623101301 |
DATE SIGNED | 11/25/2019 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Nicole Chaudhari/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Nicole Chaudhari |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of record, IL bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 312-368-4000 |
DATE SIGNED | 11/25/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Nov 25 16:14:05 EST 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.X.XX-201 91125161405731347-8833671 5-700695a96fdde155f4f4d88 d6ba25f26b83a83431b7a2eda 5f1bea626f3df83d-N/A-N/A- 20191121165725850217 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
RESPONSE
This is in response to the Office Action dated May 23, 2019, in connection with the above-identified application. Reconsideration of this application is respectfully requested in view of the following remarks.
REMARKS
In the Office Action, the Examining Attorney requested a disclaimer of the phrase BIG DATA MPI on the grounds that it is not inherently distinctive. Applicant respectfully disagrees with the Examiner’s assertion. However, in an effort to expedite prosecution of its application, Applicant hereby submits a claim of acquired distinctiveness as to the BIG DATA MPI part of the mark in accordance with Section 2(f) of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(f).
The Applicant has used the BIG DATA MPI part of the mark in commerce in connection with the identical services specified in the application for at least the last five years. The phrase BIG DATA MPI has become distinctive of the services through the Applicant’s exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement. The Declaration of Gregory Church, President for Applicant, verifying this statement, is submitted herewith.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, and since the Examining Attorney has found no similar registered or pending mark that would bar registration under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Applicant respectfully requests that the application be approved for publication. An early publication date is respectfully requested.
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.