Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE ISSUE DATE BELOW OR THE APPLICATION WILL BE ABANDONED. RESPOND USING THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS). A LINK TO THE APPROPRIATE TEAS RESPONSE FORM APPEARS AT THE END OF THIS OFFICE ACTION. 

 

Issue date:  October 01, 2019

 

The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the two (2) issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SECTIONS 1 & 45 REFUSAL – SPECIMEN DOES NOT SHOW ACTUAL USE

 

Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the mark in the drawing in use in commerce, which is required in the statement of use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).

 

The mark appearing on the specimen and in the drawing must match; that is, the mark in the drawing “must be a substantially exact representation of the mark” on the specimen. See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(b); TMEP §807.12(a). In this case, the mark on the specimen does not match the mark in the drawing because the drawing of the mark shows the wording “COOKERREADY” as a compound term with no space; the specimen, however, shows this wording as two separate words, “COOKER READY”. Applicant has thus failed to provide the required evidence of use of the mark in commerce. See In re Innovative Cos., 88 USPQ2d 1095 (TTAB 2008) (FREEDOMSTONE not a substantially exact representation of FREEDOM STONE); TMEP §§807.12(a), (e).

 

In addition, the specimen appears to consist of a mock-up of the mark on the packaging of the goods and does not show actual use of the mark in commerce. An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the statement of use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  “Use in commerce” means (1) a bona fide use of the applied-for mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is placed in any manner on the goods, packaging, tags or labels affixed to the goods, or displays that directly associate the mark with the goods and have a point-of-sale nature, and (3) the goods are actually sold or transported in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1127. An image of a product or packaging that has been digitally created or otherwise altered to include the mark does not show actual use of the mark in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §§904.04(a), 904.07(a); cf. In re Chica, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (TTAB 2007) (holding that “a mere drawing of the goods with an illustration of how the mark may be displayed” was not an acceptable specimen because it did not show actual use in commerce); In re The Signal Cos., 228 USPQ 956, 957-58 n.4 (TTAB 1986) (noting that a printer’s proof of an advertisement would not be an acceptable specimen because it does not show actual use in commerce).

 

In this case, the specimen consists of a picture of a pork-roast shrink-wrapped in plastic; that is, the plastic conforms to the shape of the pork roast. The “label” on the goods, however, appears perfectly flat across the packaging, which should not occur if the plastic wrap upon which it is placed forms itself to the shape of the pork roast. In other words, the label should bend and fold along with the plastic if it was placed directly on the packaging. Moreover, the plastic packaging shows light reflections due to the folds and creases in the plastic, but the “label” shows no such light reflections. Therefore, it appears that the “label” was digitally added to a picture of the goods and does not show how the goods actually appear in commerce. Consequently, the submitted specimen cannot be accepted.

 

Applicant may respond to this refusal by submitting a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) shows the mark in the drawing in actual use in commerce for the goods in the statement of use, and (b) was in actual use in commerce prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing the statement of use. 

 

Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale. See TMEP §§904.03 et seq. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the goods.  TMEP §904.03(i). 

 

A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior to expiration of the filing deadline for a statement of use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this verified statement.

 

PLEASE NOTE: If the substitute specimen shows the mark as ADAPTABLE MEALS COOKER READY, then applicant must also submit a new drawing of the mark that shows the mark on the specimen. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b). Applicant is advised that it may amend the mark in the drawing to match the mark on the specimen but may not make any other changes or amendments that would materially alter the drawing of the mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §807.14.

 

For instructions on how to submit a different specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.

 

Applicant, however, may not respond by withdrawing the statement of use.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.

 

INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED

 

To permit proper examination of the application record for compliance with use in commerce requirements, applicant must respond to the following requests for information and documentation about the specimen. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814. For any website source, provide a digital copy of the entire webpage from top to bottom, as rendered in an Internet browser, that includes the URL and access or print date. TMEP §710.01(b) (citing In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1733 (TTAB 2018)).

 

(1)  Identify the particular good(s) listed in the application for which the specimen was submitted to show use of the mark.

 

(2)  Was the specimen created for submission with this application?  If so, specify the date the specimen was created. If applicant obtained the image of the goods shown in the specimen from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.

 

(3)  Provide information about and examples of how applicant’s goods appear in the actual sales environment.

 

(a)   If sold in stores, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the stores and of photographs showing the goods for sale in the named stores, such as photographs of the sales displays or goods on shelves with the mark. 

 

(b)   If sold online, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the online retailers, the website URL(s) for each named retailer, and a digital copy of the webpages showing the goods for sale on the named website.

 

(c)  If sold in another type of sales environment (e.g., catalogs, trade shows), identify the environment and provide photographs and/or documentation showing the goods for sale in that environment. 

 

(4)  If the information in question (3) about how the goods appear in the actual sales environment is not available to applicant, please describe how applicant’s goods are sold or transported and provide photographs and other documentation showing how applicant’s mark appears on the goods and/or its packaging when the goods are sold or transported to or within the United States.

 

(5)  For each category of sales environment specified in response to questions (3) and (4), specify when the goods bearing the mark were first available for purchase within the United States, the date of the first sale of the goods to or within the United States, and whether the goods are still for sale to or within the United States in that environment.

 

(6)  For the goods identified in response to question (1), specify the dollar amount of sales with or within the United States and provide at least three invoices or other supporting documentation that show payments or other consideration made, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.

 

Applicant must fully respond to all the requirements for information and documentation. Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Merely stating that evidence is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional information or materials of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

RESPONSE REQUIRED

 

For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address the specimen refusal and requirement for information and documentation. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Click to file a response to this non-final Office action 

 

 

/Andrew Leaser/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 117

(571) 272-1911

andrew.leaser@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

 

Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon. A response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

Informal communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions and will not be considered; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by telephone or e-mail. All informal communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant. If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.23(b); TMEP §820. TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.23(c); TMEP §820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.

 

If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on October 01, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88334330

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Andrew Leaser/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 117

(571) 272-1911

andrew.leaser@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from October 01, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”