Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 2194 (Rev 03/2012) |
| OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp 12/31/2020) |
Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
Input Field
|
Entered
|
| SERIAL NUMBER |
88329978 |
| LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED |
LAW OFFICE 101 |
| DATE OF NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT |
12/02/2019 |
| PETITION |
| PETITION STATEMENT |
Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and
requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application. |
| RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION |
| MARK SECTION |
| MARK |
http://uspto.report/TM/88329978/mark.png |
| LITERAL ELEMENT |
SONOMA SELTZER |
| STANDARD CHARACTERS |
YES |
| USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE |
YES |
| MARK STATEMENT |
The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
| ARGUMENT(S) |
| Dear Andrew, I'm the applicant that filed for the trademark on Sonoma seltzer you and I spoke on the phone sometime ago regarding the issues
with the trademark and I appreciate your insight to why it was rejected due to geographical areas. I recently submitted a statement of use form and thought that was all I needed to apply and change
this trademark to a supplemental trademark I was not aware I needed to go through this process to revive and or respond to the issues that were provided to me in the original rejection of the
trademark. If you could please consider reviving The trademark so that I can convert it into a supplemental trademark that would be much appreciated as I've already filed for the statement of use and
paid the appropriate fees per the USPTO website. Thank you Dave Herrera |
| EVIDENCE SECTION |
| DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE |
The evidence I can provide was filed with the USPTO website under the statement of use form my intention was to convert the trademark into a
supplemental trademark as there was an issue with my trademark due to geographical areas. |
| PAYMENT SECTION |
| TOTAL AMOUNT |
100 |
| TOTAL FEES DUE |
100 |
| SIGNATURE SECTION |
| PETITION SIGNATURE |
/David Herrera/ |
| SIGNATORY'S NAME |
David Herrera |
| SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
Applicant |
| SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
9168219866 |
| DATE SIGNED |
12/02/2019 |
| RESPONSE SIGNATURE |
/David Herrera/ |
| SIGNATORY'S NAME |
/David Herrera/ |
| SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
Applicant |
| SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
9168219866 |
| DATE SIGNED |
12/02/2019 |
| AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY |
YES |
| FILING INFORMATION SECTION |
| SUBMIT DATE |
Mon Dec 02 19:05:10 EST 2019 |
| TEAS STAMP |
USPTO/POA-XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:
XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX-
20191202190510955913-8832
9978-700c311cb5d9bd846f9c
597cf18a3bc860e62ecd59d76
c146b4b6ef3f6bec68fd-CC-0
5096510-20191202183931998
744 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 2194 (Rev 03/2012) |
| OMB No. 0651-0054 (Exp 12/31/2020) |
Petition To Revive Abandoned Application - Failure To Respond Timely To Office Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
88329978 SONOMA SELTZER(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88329978/mark.png) has been amended as follows:
PETITION Petition
Statement
Applicant has firsthand knowledge that the failure to respond to the Office Action by the specified deadline was unintentional, and requests the USPTO to revive the abandoned application.
RESPONSE
TO OFFICE ACTION
ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
Dear Andrew, I'm the applicant that filed for the trademark on Sonoma seltzer you and I spoke on the phone sometime ago regarding the issues with the trademark and I appreciate your insight to why it
was rejected due to geographical areas. I recently submitted a statement of use form and thought that was all I needed to apply and change this trademark to a supplemental trademark I was not aware I
needed to go through this process to revive and or respond to the issues that were provided to me in the original rejection of the trademark. If you could please consider reviving The trademark so
that I can convert it into a supplemental trademark that would be much appreciated as I've already filed for the statement of use and paid the appropriate fees per the USPTO website. Thank you Dave
Herrera
EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of The evidence I can provide was filed with the USPTO website under the statement of use form my intention was to convert the trademark into a supplemental trademark as there
was an issue with my trademark due to geographical areas. has been attached.
FEE(S)
Fee(s) in the amount of $100 is being submitted.
SIGNATURE(S)
Signature: /David Herrera/ Date: 12/02/2019
Signatory's Name: David Herrera
Signatory's Position: Applicant
Signatory's Phone Number: 9168219866
Response Signature
Signature: /David Herrera/ Date: 12/02/2019
Signatory's Name: /David Herrera/
Signatory's Position: Applicant
Signatory's Phone Number: 9168219866
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is not represented by an authorized attorney, and that he/she is either: (1) the owner/holder ; or (2) a person or persons with legal authority to bind the
owner/holder; and if he/she had previously been represented by an attorney in this matter, either he/she revoked their power of attorney by filing a signed revocation with the USPTO or the USPTO has
granted this attorney's withdrawal request.
RAM Sale Number: 88329978
RAM Accounting Date: 12/02/2019
Serial Number: 88329978
Internet Transmission Date: Mon Dec 02 19:05:10 EST 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/POA-XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:
XXXX:XXXX-20191202190510955913-88329978-
700c311cb5d9bd846f9c597cf18a3bc860e62ecd
59d76c146b4b6ef3f6bec68fd-CC-05096510-20
191202183931998744