To: | TEQUILA CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V. (docket@lawabel.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88319044 - ESENCIA DE AGAVE - 879682 |
Sent: | 5/28/2019 3:09:36 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM128@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 Attachment - 21 Attachment - 22 Attachment - 23 Attachment - 24 Attachment - 25 Attachment - 26 Attachment - 27 Attachment - 28 Attachment - 29 Attachment - 30 Attachment - 31 Attachment - 32 Attachment - 33 Attachment - 34 Attachment - 35 Attachment - 36 Attachment - 37 Attachment - 38 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88319044
MARK: ESENCIA DE AGAVE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: TEQUILA CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/28/2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL - MERELY DESCRIPTIVE
The applicant has applied for use of the mark ESENCIA DE AGAVE in standard characters for use in connection with “Non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails containing distilled blue agave liquor” in International Class 32, as well as “Distilled blue agave liquor” in International Class 33.
The term “AGAVE” refers to a genus of plants, namely succulents often confused with cacti, known for their economic significance in the production of mescal liquors. Attachment 1. Further, although the applicant did not submit a translation of any terms in the applied-for mark, the terms “ESENCIA DE” translate to “Essence of” in English. Attachments 2-3. Thus, in full, the mark when translated refers to the essence of agave.
The applicant’s mark is in Spanish, which is a common, modern language in the United States. In re Aquamar, Inc., 115 USPQ2d 1122 (TTAB 2015) (Spanish). The doctrine is applied when “the ordinary American purchaser” would “stop and translate” the foreign term into its English equivalent. Palm Bay, 396 F.3d at 1377, 73 USPQ2d at 1696 (quoting In re Pan Tex Hotel Corp., 190 USPQ 109, 110 (TTAB 1976)); TMEP §1209.03(g). The ordinary American purchaser includes those proficient in the foreign language. In re Spirits Int’l, N.V., 563 F.3d 1347, 1352, 90 USPQ2d 1489, 1492 (Fed. Cir. 2009); see In re Highlights for Children, Inc., 118 USPQ2d at 1271. In this case, the ordinary American purchaser would likely stop and translate the mark because the Spanish language is a common, modern language spoken by an appreciable number of consumers in the United States.
In turn, an “essence” refers to “[a]n extract or concentrate obtained from a particular plant or other matter and used for flavoring or scent,” or likewise to “[a]n extract that has the fundamental properties of a substance in concentrated form” or “[s]uch an extract in a solution of alcohol.” Attachments 4-5. As such, the terms as used in the applied-for mark refer to an extract obtained from the agave plant and used for flavoring, including when used with alcohol. E.g. Attachments 6-7. In this respect, the terms “essence of” are used descriptively in the industry to identify the ingredients and flavors of beverages. Attachments 8-11.
The applicant, as noted previously, has identified goods of “Non-alcoholic beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails containing distilled blue agave liquor” and “Distilled blue agave liquor.”
As an initial note, “blue agave” is the common name for a species, specifically Agave tequilana, within the agave genus noted previously in defining the term “AGAVE.” Attachment 12. As well, a “liquor” is “a liquid substance: such as . . . a usually distilled rather than fermented alcoholic beverage.” Attachment 13. As such, the mark ESENCIA DE AGAVE immediately identifies an ingredient, or the use of that ingredient to provide the feature of flavoring, of the identified goods of “non-alcoholic cocktails containing distilled blue agave liquor” and “distilled blue agave liquor.”
In conclusion, when consumers encounter the applicant’s goods under the applied-for mark, they immediately will understand the mark as indicating an ingredient or feature of the goods rather than as an indicator of the source of those goods. Therefore, the mark is merely descriptive and registration is refused pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act.
ADVISORY – AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
If applicant files an acceptable allegation of use and also amends to the Supplemental Register, the application effective filing date will be the date applicant met the minimum filing requirements under 37 C.F.R. §2.76(c) for an amendment to allege use. TMEP §§816.02, 1102.03; see 37 C.F.R. §2.75(b). In addition, the undersigned trademark examining attorney will conduct a new search of the USPTO records for conflicting marks based on the later application filing date. TMEP §§206.01, 1102.03.
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Additionally, the wording “Non-alcoholic cocktails containing distilled blue agave liquor” creates ambiguity. While noting the identified beverages to be non-alcoholic, the wording also indicates the beverages contain distilled liquor, which may be alcoholic. Attachment 14. This ambiguity is compounded by the applicant’s identification of “Distilled blue agave liquor” within International Class 33, which contains alcohol. Therefore, clarification is warranted.
Applicant may substitute the following wording (with additions bolded), if accurate:
CLASS 29: “Vegetable-based food beverages”
CLASS 30: “Grain-based beverages”
CLASS 32: “Non-alcoholic beverages composed of _______ [applicant must indicate the basis of the beverage, e.g., cactus, fruit, aloe]; Non-alcoholic cocktails containing distilled blue agave non-alcoholic liquor”
CLASS 33: “Distilled blue agave liquor”
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods services that are classified in at least four classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only two classes. Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
The English translation of “ESENCIA DE” in the mark is “ESSENCE OF.”
TMEP §809.03. See Attachments 2-3 (translation evidence).
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Jeffrey Oakes/
Jeffrey Oakes
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(571) 272-8653
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.