TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

SIMPLY FIT

Ryczek, Jodi

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field	Entered
SERIAL NUMBER	88315907
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED	LAW OFFICE 116
MARK SECTION
MARK	http://uspto.report/TM/88315907/mark.png
LITERAL ELEMENT	SIMPLY FIT
STANDARD CHARACTERS	YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE	YES
MARK STATEMENT	The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color.
EVIDENCE SECTION
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S)
ORIGINAL PDF FILE	evi_9822310205-20191013111317511892_._Simply_Fit.pdf
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (1 page)	\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT17\883\159\88315907\xml10\RFR0002.JPG
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE	Please see attached flyers that we use in conjunction with Simply Fit classes.
SIGNATURE SECTION
RESPONSE SIGNATURE	/Jodi Ryczek/
SIGNATORY'S NAME	Jodi Ryczek
SIGNATORY'S POSITION	Owner
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER	8473542209
DATE SIGNED	10/13/2019
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY	YES
CONCURRENT APPEAL NOTICE FILED	NO
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE	Sun Oct 13 12:09:31 EDT 2019
TEAS STAMP	USPTO/RFR-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2 0191013120931289123-88315 907-6108a2072b7e755d1788d aa54b8c6b9f880b9ad566853d 30992946129c372727-N/A-N/ A-20191013111317511892

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1960 (Rev 10/2011)

OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020)

Request for Reconsideration after Final Action

To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 88315907 SIMPLY FIT(Standard Characters, see http://uspto.report/TM/88315907/mark.png) has been amended as follows:

EVIDENCE
Evidence in the nature of Please see attached flyers that we use in conjunction with Simply Fit classes. has been attached.
Original PDF file:
evi_9822310205-20191013111317511892_._Simply_Fit.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 1 page)
Evidence-1

SIGNATURE(S)
Request for Reconsideration Signature
Signature: /Jodi Ryczek/ Date: 10/13/2019
Signatory's Name: Jodi Ryczek
Signatory's Position: Owner

Signatory's Phone Number: 8473542209

The signatory has confirmed that he/she is not represented by an authorized attorney, and that he/she is either: (1) the owner/holder ; or (2) a person or persons with legal authority to bind the owner/holder; and if he/she had previously been represented by an attorney in this matter, either he/she revoked their power of attorney by filing a signed revocation with the USPTO or the USPTO has granted this attorney's withdrawal request.

The applicant is not filing a Notice of Appeal in conjunction with this Request for Reconsideration.

Serial Number: 88315907
Internet Transmission Date: Sun Oct 13 12:09:31 EDT 2019
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/RFR-XX.XXX.XX.XXX-2019101312093128
9123-88315907-6108a2072b7e755d1788daa54b
8c6b9f880b9ad566853d30992946129c372727-N
/A-N/A-20191013111317511892

TEAS Request Reconsideration after FOA [image/jpeg]

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.