Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88311698 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 117 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88311698/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | AST |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
Remarks The following remarks are responsive to the May 3, 2019 Office Action. Applicant notes that the deadline for responding to this Office Action fell on a weekend, Sunday, November 3, 2019. Therefore, this response is timely filed the following business day, Monday, November 4, 2019. In view of the following remarks, Applicant respectfully requests passage of the applied-for mark to publication. Applicant notes that the Examining Attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration of the applied-for mark. Registration of this applied-for mark has been refused, however, since the Office Action submits that the applied-for mark is merely descriptive of the goods. In response to this refusal, Applicant has amended the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register by submitting a specimen of use and the dates of first use of the applied-for mark. Therefore, withdrawal of this refusal is respectfully requested. The Office Action also submits that the applied-for mark appears to be generic of the goods identified in the present application. Applicant respectfully disagrees with this interpretation of the applied-for mark. Applicant notes that the Office Action submits that the applied-for mark “appears to be” generic for the goods in the present application, but has not affirmatively asserted that the applied-for mark has been interpreted as such. Applicant requests further explanation regarding these comments in the Office Action. Applicant also notes that the two-part inquiry for establishing genericness of a mark has not been used in the present Office Action. A two-part inquiry is used to determine whether a designation is generic: (1) What is the genus of goods or services at issue? and (2) Does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods or services? In the present application, the goods are directed to fluid storage tanks and dry goods storage tanks. Applicant respectfully submits, however, it has not been clearly established that the relevant public understands that the designation primarily refers to this genus of goods. (“ The examining attorney has the burden of proving that a term is generic by clear evidence.” – TMEP Section 1209.01(c)(i)). Therefore, Applicant respectfully submits that sufficient evidence for interpreting the applied-for mark as being generic has not been produced with this Office Action. The Office Action further submits that the description of goods needs to be clarified. According to the Examining Attorney’s suggestions in the Office Action, Applicant has amended the description of goods as follows: Class 11 has been deleted New Class 6: “Metal fluid storage tanks; metal storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks”; and New Class 20: “Plastic fluid storage tanks; Plastic storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks; Fiberglass fluid storage tanks; Fiberglass storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks”. Therefore, in view of these amendments, Applicant respectfully submits that the descriptions of goods are sufficiently definite. Withdrawal of this refusal is respectfully requested. Conclusion In view of the foregoing amendments and remarks, Applicant respectfully requests reconsideration of the refusal and passage of the applied-for mark to publication. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (011)(class deleted) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (006)(class added)Original Class (011) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 006 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Metal fluid storage tanks; metal storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2017 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2017 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\883\116\88311698\xml4\ ROA0002.JPG |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | photograph of a tag bearing the applied-for mark that is affixed to the goods |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (020)(class added) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 020 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Plastic fluid storage tanks; Plastic storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks; Fiberglass fluid storage tanks; Fiberglass storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(a) |
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2017 |
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE | At least as early as 01/00/2017 |
STATEMENT TYPE | "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application"[for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR "The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use" [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. OR "The attached specimen is a true copy of the specimen that was originally submitted with the application, amendment to allege use, or statement of use" [for an illegible specimen]. |
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT17\IMAGEOUT 17\883\116\88311698\xml4\ ROA0003.JPG |
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION | photograph of a tag bearing the applied-for mark that is affixed to the goods |
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS SECTION | |
SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | The applicant seeks registration of the mark on the Supplemental Register (i.e., a change of the words 'Principal Register' to 'Supplemental Register'). |
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |
NAME | Christian E. Schuster, Reg. No. 43,908 |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | THE WEBB LAW FIRM |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | ONE GATEWAY CENTER |
STREET | 420 FT. DUQUESNE BLVD. STE. 1200 |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15222 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 412-471-8815 |
FAX | 412-471-4094 |
trademarks@webblaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 6705-1807993 |
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Christian E. Schuster, Reg. No. 43,908 |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | THE WEBB LAW FIRM |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | ONE GATEWAY CENTER |
STREET | 420 FT. DUQUESNE BLVD. STE. 1200 |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15222 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 412-471-8815 |
FAX | 412-471-4094 |
trademarks@webblaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 6705-1807993 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |
NAME | CHRISTIAN E. SCHUSTER, REG. NO. 43,908 |
FIRM NAME | THE WEBB LAW FIRM |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | ONE GATEWAY CENTER |
STREET | 420 FT. DUQUESNE BLVD. STE. 1200 |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15222 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 412-471-8815 |
FAX | 412-471-4094 |
trademarks@webblaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 6705-1807993 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Christian E. Schuster, Reg. No. 43,908 |
FIRM NAME | THE WEBB LAW FIRM |
INTERNAL ADDRESS | ONE GATEWAY CENTER |
STREET | 420 FT. DUQUESNE BLVD. STE. 1200 |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15222 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 412-471-8815 |
FAX | 412-471-4094 |
trademarks@webblaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 6705-1807993 |
PAYMENT SECTION | |
NUMBER OF CLASSES | 1 |
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION PER CLASS | 275 |
TOTAL FEES DUE | 275 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
DECLARATION SIGNATURE | /cps/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Christopher P. Sherwin |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, PA bar member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 412-471-8815 |
DATE SIGNED | 11/04/2019 |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /cps/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Christopher P. Sherwin |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, PA Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 412-471-8815 |
DATE SIGNED | 11/04/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Nov 04 16:47:58 EST 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX- 20191104164758986057-8831 1698-7001ac7f3881e742979f 11d847e628a877989b2cc0753 6645eb54fde8dcae9c31-CC-4 7571075-20191104164634970 683 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Remarks
The following remarks are responsive to the May 3, 2019 Office Action. Applicant notes that the deadline for responding to this Office Action fell on a weekend, Sunday, November 3, 2019. Therefore, this response is timely filed the following business day, Monday, November 4, 2019. In view of the following remarks, Applicant respectfully requests passage of the applied-for mark to publication.
Applicant notes that the Examining Attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration of the applied-for mark.
Registration of this applied-for mark has been refused, however, since the Office Action submits that the applied-for mark is merely descriptive of the goods. In response to this refusal, Applicant has amended the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register by submitting a specimen of use and the dates of first use of the applied-for mark. Therefore, withdrawal of this refusal is respectfully requested.
The Office Action also submits that the applied-for mark appears to be generic of the goods identified in the present application. Applicant respectfully disagrees with this interpretation of the applied-for mark. Applicant notes that the Office Action submits that the applied-for mark “appears to be” generic for the goods in the present application, but has not affirmatively asserted that the applied-for mark has been interpreted as such. Applicant requests further explanation regarding these comments in the Office Action.
Applicant also notes that the two-part inquiry for establishing genericness of a mark has not been used in the present Office Action. A two-part inquiry is used to determine whether a designation is generic: (1) What is the genus of goods or services at issue? and (2) Does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods or services? In the present application, the goods are directed to fluid storage tanks and dry goods storage tanks. Applicant respectfully submits, however, it has not been clearly established that the relevant public understands that the designation primarily refers to this genus of goods. (“ The examining attorney has the burden of proving that a term is generic by clear evidence.” – TMEP Section 1209.01(c)(i)). Therefore, Applicant respectfully submits that sufficient evidence for interpreting the applied-for mark as being generic has not been produced with this Office Action.
The Office Action further submits that the description of goods needs to be clarified. According to the Examining Attorney’s suggestions in the Office Action, Applicant has amended the description of goods as follows:
Class 11 has been deleted
New Class 6: “Metal fluid storage tanks; metal storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks”; and
New Class 20: “Plastic fluid storage tanks; Plastic storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks; Fiberglass fluid storage tanks; Fiberglass storage tanks, namely, dry goods storage tanks”.
Therefore, in view of these amendments, Applicant respectfully submits that the descriptions of goods are sufficiently definite. Withdrawal of this refusal is respectfully requested.
Conclusion
In view of the foregoing amendments and remarks, Applicant respectfully requests reconsideration of the refusal and passage of the applied-for mark to publication.
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(a) APPLICATION/AOU: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §1051(a) or AOU under 15 U.S.C. §1051(c), the signatory additionally believes that: the applicant is the owner of the mark sought to be registered; the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; the original specimen(s), if applicable, shows the mark in use in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization in the application or AOU; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark application, or certification mark application, the applicant is exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and was exercising legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the filing date of the application or AOU; for a certification mark application, the applicant is not engaged in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.
STATEMENTS FOR UNSIGNED SECTION 1(b)/SECTION 44 APPLICATION AND FOR SECTION 66(a) COLLECTIVE/CERTIFICATION MARK APPLICATION: If the applicant filed an unsigned application under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(b), 1126(d), and/or 1126(e), or filed a collective/certification mark application under 15 U.S.C. §1141f(a), the signatory additionally believes that: for a trademark or service mark application, the applicant is entitled to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods/services specified in the application; the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; for a collective trademark, collective service mark, collective membership mark, or certification mark application, the applicant has a bona fide intention, and is entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention, and was entitled, to exercise legitimate control over the use of the mark in commerce as of the application filing date; the signatory is properly authorized to execute the declaration on behalf of the applicant; for a certification mark application, the applicant will not engage in the production or marketing of the goods/services to which the mark is applied, except to advertise or promote recognition of the certification program or of the goods/services that meet the certification standards of the applicant. To the best of the signatory's knowledge and belief, no other persons, except, if applicable, authorized users, members, and/or concurrent users, have the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services/collective membership organization of such other persons, to cause confusion or mistake, or to deceive.