To: | Balmoral Engineering Pty Ltd (chris@balmoralengineering.com.au) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88311256 - TIGER TAILS - Tigertails |
Sent: | 5/2/2019 11:27:07 AM |
Sent As: | ECOM121@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88311256
MARK: TIGER TAILS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Balmoral Engineering Pty Ltd
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 5/2/2019
This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on March 28, 2019 in connection with this application. Based on information and documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new requirement: Identification of Goods Requirement. See TMEP §§706, 711.02.
In a previous Office action dated March 28, 2019, applicant was required to satisfy the following requirements: Foreign Registration Requirement and Drawing Requirement.
Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that applicant provided a true copy of the foreign registration and clarified for the record that the mark in the foreign registration includes a claim that the mark is in standard characters (or the equivalent). As such, the aforementioned Foreign Registration Requirement and Drawing Requirement are satisfied. See TMEP §713.02.
However, the identification of goods in the application are outside the scope of the identification of goods in the foreign registration. Thus, applicant must address the requirement as provided below.
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
• NEW ISSUE: Identification of Goods Requirement
Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous March 28, 2019 Office action (if applicable), within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02. If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIREMENT
In this case, the U.S. application identifies the particular goods as follows: “Insulating sleeves for power lines; Insulators for electrical cables; Insulating splice cover for electrical cable.”
However, the foreign registration identifies the following goods: “plastic wrap wound around power lines and electrical cables and other electrical conductors to produce temporary or permanent insulation or increase existing insulation and/or increase visibility and/or signal an electrical hazard.”
These goods in the U.S. application exceed the scope of the goods in the foreign registration because the goods do not specify that they are plastic wrap as specified in the foreign registration. Additionally, the goods in the U.S. application do not provide the use of the goods as provided in the foreign registration, namely that they goods are to produce temporary or permanent insulation or increase existing insulation and/or increase visibility and/or signal an electrical hazard. Accordingly, applicant’s goods in the U.S. application exceed the scope of the goods in the foreign registration.
Therefore, applicant may respond by satisfying one of the following:
(1) Amending the identification of goods in the U.S. application to correspond to the goods in the foreign registration, ensuring that all goods beyond the scope of the foreign registration are deleted and/or amended in the U.S. application.
Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate (changes in bold):
Insulating sleeves in the nature of plastic wrap for power lines to produce temporary or permanent insulation, increase existing insulation, increase visibility and signal an electrical hazard; Insulators in the nature of plastic wrap for electrical cables to produce temporary or permanent insulation, increase existing insulation, increase visibility and signal an electrical hazard; Insulating splice cover in the nature of plastic wrap for electrical cable to produce temporary or permanent insulation, increase existing insulation, increase visibility and signal an electrical hazard.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Applicant may amend the identifications above to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted. See TMEP §1402.07(e). Additionally, for U.S. applications filed under Trademark Act Section 44(e), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments may not exceed the scope of the goods identified in the foreign registration. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); Marmark, Ltd. v. Nutrexpa, S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989) (citing In re Löwenbräu München, 175 USPQ 178, 181 (TTAB 1972)); TMEP §§1012, 1402.01(b).
OR
(2) Substituting a basis under Section 1(a) or 1(b) for those goods in the U.S. application that are beyond the scope of the foreign registration. An applicant may assert more than one basis in an application (except Section 1(a) and 1(b) may not be asserted for the same goods), provided all requirements are satisfied for each claimed basis.
Under Trademark Act Section 1(a), an applicant must provide the following: (1) a statement that “the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce as of the application filing date;” (2) dates of first use of the mark; (3) a specimen for each class and a statement that “the specimen(s) was in use in commerce at least as early as the application filing date;” and (4) verification, in an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, of these two statements and the dates of first use. See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(1); TMEP §§903, 904.
Under Trademark Act Section 1(b), an applicant must provide the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date.” See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2).
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.34(b), 2.35(b); Marmark Ltd. v. Nutrexpa S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989); TMEP §§806.02, 806.03(h), 1402.01(b).
NOTE: Additionally, applicant may respond by arguing that these goods are within the scope of the foreign registration and should remain in the U.S. application.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Applicant may call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the requirement in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Michael J. Clark/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
(571) 272-4967
michael.clark1@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.