To: | DiCan, Inc. (mdockins@shumaker.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88301444 - GOOD TO GO - 228613 |
Sent: | December 04, 2019 03:46:25 PM |
Sent As: | ecom125@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88301444
Mark: GOOD TO GO
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: DiCan, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 228613
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: December 04, 2019
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Application suspended until submission of foreign registration or proof that foreign registration was renewed. Applicant is required to provide a copy of a foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin; the foreign registration must be valid when the U.S. registration issues. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01(a). Action on the application is suspended until the USPTO receives a copy of such foreign registration or proof that the foreign registration was renewed. TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04. Applicant must also provide an English translation if the foreign registration or renewal document is not in English. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii).
If the foreign application abandons or the foreign registration is not renewed, applicant should promptly notify the trademark examining attorney. See TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a). In such case, applicant may amend the application to rely on another filing basis, if appropriate, and will retain the priority filing date, if applicable. TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a).
STATUS OF OTHER ISSUES
In the previous 5/1/19 Office action, the applicant was required to clarify its identification of goods and comply with any relevant multi-class requirements. These requirements have been satisfied.
Additionally, the examining attorney cited U.S. Application Serial No. 87575434 as a prior filed application containing a mark which, if registered, might cause a likelihood of confusion between the registered mark and the applied-for mark. Although the prior filed application ultimately matured into a registration, additional research indicated that there is not a likelihood of confusion between the marks. Accordingly, there is no Section 2(d) refusal.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Kyle Ingram/
Kyle Ingram
Attorney Advisor
Law Office 125
(571)272-5276
Kyle.ingram@uspto.gov