Notation to File

CREST

More Floods Inc.

Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88298270

DATE:                                04/29/2019

NAME:                               kmoninghoff

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
    X   phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

From: Moninghoff, Kim
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 8:08 AM
To: tmdocketing.colombo@hoveywilliams.com
Subject: Trademark Application #88298270 CREST (Docket #52115)

 

Mr. Colombo,

 

I’ve been assigned to review this trademark application.  Before I can approve the mark for publication, there are two issues that must be addressed.  I may be able to take care of these for you by Examiner’s Amendment if you provide your consent to the amendments below.

 

(1) Identification/classification of services.  The identification of services includes business consulting services in Class 41.  These must be reclassified in Class 35.  The applicant’s coaching services also must be amended to specify the type of coaching provided, such as professional coaching.  The following amendments would address these issues:

 

advertising and marketing; business marketing services; business consulting in the field of water damage restoration, in Class 35.

 

business training; training courses in strategic planning relating to advertising, promotion, marketing and business; training and professional coaching in the field of water damage restoration, in Class 41.

 

(2) Section 2(d) Refusal.  There are two registrations that combine the term CREST with descriptive wording for advertising/marketing services:

 

Registration No. 4684107 THE CREST MAGAZINE for “Advertising services,” in Class 35.

 

Registration No. 5346132 MARKETCREST for “Marketing and advertising services; Marketing consulting; Search engine optimization for sales promotion; Pay per click (PPC) advertising management service,” in Class 35.

 

These registrations are able to coexist because they each include a term, MAGAZINE/MARKET, not found in the other mark.  In contrast, the applicant’s mark does not include any term with CREST to distinguish it from these marks.  If you consent to further limit the applicant’s Class 35 services to the following, I can avoid issuing a Section 2(d) refusal as to these registrations:

 

business consulting in the field of water damage restoration, in Class 35.

 

If you consent to all of the amendments discussed above, I can enter them by Examiner’s Amendment and approve the mark for publication.

 

If you would like an opportunity to provide argument/evidence regarding the refusal, you can still provide your consent to the amendments in (1) above.  I would then issue a combined Examiner’s Amendment/Priority Action, which includes the Section 2(d) refusal for the advertising and marketing services.

 

You can provide your consent to either of these options by reply email or phone. If you have any questions, please let me know.  As a reminder, I cannot accept argument/evidence by email so you would need to wait until I issue the above refusal and submit any argument/evidence in a formal response.

 

If I don’t hear back from you by the end of the day Tuesday (4/30), I will issue a formal Office action with the above refusal and requirement.  Thank you. 

 

 

Kim Teresa Moninghoff

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

Phone:  571-272-4738

Fax: 571-273-4738

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2025 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed