Notation to File

ELEXCORE

DENSO CORPORATION

RE: Application Nos.88978610, 88298093 ELEXCORE (Docket #4041TK200031)   Good morning,   You did not request to delete the 1(b) basis.  As you indicated in your email below, you stated that 44(e) was the sole basis, as if it had been since filing, which is not correct.  I assumed you were mistaken, and I assume the ITU paralegal that processed the request to divide assumed that as well.   The corrected NOA still includes both filing bases and the following instructions for correcting/amending that information:   If you believe this NOA should not have issued or correction of the information shown below is needed, you must submit a request to the Intent-to-Use Unit. Please use the "Post-Publication Amendment" form under the "POST-APPROVAL/PUBLICATION/POST NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE (NOA) AMENDMENT FORMS" category, available at https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/filing-online/post-approvalpublicationpost-notice-allowance-noa. Do NOT reply to this e-mail, as e-mailed filings will NOT be processed.     Kim Teresa Moninghoff Trademark Examining Attorney Law Office 113 Phone:  571-272-4738   All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.   From: Aurini, Geoffrey <gaurini@HDP.com> Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2020 2:32 PM To: Moninghoff, Kim <Kim.Moninghoff@USPTO.GOV> Cc: Troy Mail Room <mailroom@HDP.com>; Langlois, Pam <palanglois@HDP.com> Subject: RE: Application Nos.88978610, 88298093 ELEXCORE (Docket #4041TK200031)   Hi, Kim-sorry I could not respond before now.  In the request to divide we did say there was no1b basis and the goods based on the foreign registration should move to registration.  Shouldn’t that be enough to have avoided the NOA? Hope you have/had a great weekend. Regards /gda/, Geoff       Geoffrey D. Aurini | Attorney at Law, PrincipalO | 248.641.1238    M | 248.227.0880 IP Causes Worldwide

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88298093

DATE:                                09/10/2020

NAME:                               kmoninghoff

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search           Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

 X   OTHER:

From: Moninghoff, Kim
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 8:46 AM
To: Aurini, Geoffrey <gaurini@HDP.com>
Cc: Troy Mail Room <mailroom@HDP.com>; Langlois, Pam <palanglois@HDP.com>
Subject: RE: Application Nos.88978610, 88298093 ELEXCORE (Docket #4041TK200031)

 

Good morning,

 

You did not request to delete the 1(b) basis.  As you indicated in your email below, you stated that 44(e) was the sole basis, as if it had been since filing, which is not correct.  I assumed you were mistaken, and I assume the ITU paralegal that processed the request to divide assumed that as well.

 

The corrected NOA still includes both filing bases and the following instructions for correcting/amending that information:

 

If you believe this NOA should not have issued or correction of the information shown below is needed, you must submit a request to the Intent-to-Use Unit. Please use the "Post-Publication Amendment" form under the "POST-APPROVAL/PUBLICATION/POST NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE (NOA) AMENDMENT FORMS" category, available at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-application-process/filing-online/post-approvalpublicationpost-notice-allowance-noa. Do NOT reply to this e-mail, as e-mailed filings will NOT be processed.

 

 

Kim Teresa Moninghoff

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

Phone:  571-272-4738

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

From: Aurini, Geoffrey <gaurini@HDP.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2020 2:32 PM
To: Moninghoff, Kim <
Kim.Moninghoff@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Troy Mail Room <
mailroom@HDP.com>; Langlois, Pam <palanglois@HDP.com>
Subject: RE: Application Nos.88978610, 88298093 ELEXCORE (Docket #4041TK200031)

 

Hi, Kim-sorry I could not respond before now.  In the request to divide we did say there was no1b basis and the goods based on the foreign registration should move to registration.  Shouldn’t that be enough to have avoided the NOA?

Hope you have/had a great weekend.

Regards

/gda/,

Geoff

 

 

 

Geoffrey D. Aurini | Attorney at Law, Principal
O | 248.641.1238    M 248.227.0880 
IP Causes Worldwide

 

From: Moninghoff, Kim <Kim.Moninghoff@USPTO.GOV>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 10:46 AM
To: Aurini, Geoffrey <
gaurini@HDP.com>
Cc: Troy Mail Room <
mailroom@HDP.com>; Langlois, Pam <palanglois@HDP.com>
Subject: Application Nos.88978610, 88298093 ELEXCORE (Docket #4041TK200031)

 

EXTERNAL EMAIL

 

Mr. Aurini,

 

I accepted the SOU that you filed for the child application (listed first in the subject line) created by the request to divide.

 

I noticed that the request to divide and SOU include statements that the parent application has Section 44(e) as the sole filing basis.  However, I can’t find anything in the record to support this.  The original application includes a dual basis Sections 1(b)/44(e) for all four classes with no parenthetical limitations as to any of the goods.  I don’t see any limitations added in the 9/16/2019 response, and the original NOA also lists both filing bases with no limitations as to any specific goods.

 

If you can point to something in the record, where this change to the basis was made, I can take a look.  Otherwise, you’ll need to file an amendment to delete the Section 1(b) basis using the first form on this page:  http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks-application-process/filing-online/post-approvalpublicationpost-notice-allowance-noa.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thank you.

 

Kim Teresa Moninghoff

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

Phone:  571-272-4738

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 


HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC LEGAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information protected from use and/or disclosure by law, including information that is protected as confidential, attorney-client privileged, attorney work product and/or trade secrets. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any use, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you believe you have received this facsimile or message in error, please immediately notify us at our expense by return mail or e-mail and permanently delete or destroy all copies of the message.
To comply with U.S. Treasury regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this communication was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by any person (i) to avoid penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any matter addressed herein. Any portions of this transmission containing controlled technical data are restricted by U.S. export laws and regulations, and may not be distributed or retransmitted to non-U.S. persons without appropriate licensing or a licensing exemption. Neither this information block, nor the signature block, nor the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is included.

 


This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com


         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 88978610

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed