Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88296009 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 114 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK FILE NAME | http://uspto.report/TM/88296009/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | F FLEX |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | NO |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
With respect to the disclaimer requirement for FLEX as being descriptive, Applicant respectfully submits that a mark is descriptive if it immediately describes a significant ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of relevant goods or services. In re Gyulay, 3 U.S.P.Q.2d 1009 (Fed.Cir.1987); In re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 229 U.S.P.Q. 818 (Fed.Cir. 1986). In re MetPath Inc., 223 U.S.P.Q. 88 (T.T.A.B. 1984); In re Bright-Crest, Ltd., 204 U.S.P.Q. 591 (T.T.A.B. 1979); TMEP §1209.01(b). Additionally, not only must a mark immediately impart information about the goods or services, but it must also do so with “a degree of particularity”. In re Intelligent Medical Systems, Inc., 5 U.S.P.Q.2d 1674 (T.T.A.B. 1987); In re Analog Devices Inc., 6 U.S.P.Q.2d 1808 (T.T.A.B. 1988). Finally, any doubts regarding whether a mark is “merely descriptive” are to be resolved in favor of the applicant. In re Conductive Sys., Inc. 220 U.S.P.Q. 84 (T.T.A.B. 1983). Applicant respectfully submits that the proposed mark is not descriptive, but suggestive.
Applicant respectfully asserts that the mark “FLEX” does not immediately impart information about the goods with a degree of particularity. Instead, the consumer is
required to gather information as to what goods are associated with the mark. The relevant public would be required to gather further information about Applicant’s goods. Such exercise of information gathering to reach a conclusion of the services is suggestive rather than merely descriptive. In re Nobile Co., 225 USPQ 749, 750 (TTAB 1985) (NOBURST held suggestive as opposed to merely descriptive for a product that reduces the likelihood that pipes of a water system in which it is used will burst since the Board did not “believe this conclusion is readily arrived at by merely observing the mark of the goods but that it requires interpretation by the viewer.” Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that no disclaimer is required. |
|
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class deleted) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (class added) Original Class (009) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 041 |
DESCRIPTION | |
Exercise and fitness programs, namely, physical fitness instruction; providing exercise fitness information; providing on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring health information; entertainment and education, namely, conducting classes about fitness and health; providing fitness information and non-line non-downloadable articles about fitness programs; organizing health and fitness classes | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |
NAME | Justin Lampel |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. |
STREET | 555 SKOKIE BLVD., SUITE 500 |
CITY | NORTHBROOK |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60062 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 847-845-4345 |
FAX | 847.725.0077 |
jlampel@lampellaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | FFI-T-19-03 |
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Justin Lampel |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. |
STREET | 555 SKOKIE BLVD., SUITE 500 |
CITY | NORTHBROOK |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60062 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 847-845-4345 |
FAX | 847.725.0077 |
jlampel@lampellaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | FFI-T-19-03 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |
NAME | JUSTIN LAMPEL |
FIRM NAME | LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. |
STREET | 555 SKOKIE BLVD., SUITE 500 |
CITY | NORTHBROOK |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60062 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 847-845-4345 |
FAX | 847.725.0077 |
jlampel@lampellaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | FFI-T-19-03 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | Justin Lampel |
FIRM NAME | LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. |
STREET | 555 SKOKIE BLVD., SUITE 500 |
CITY | NORTHBROOK |
STATE | Illinois |
POSTAL CODE | 60062 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 847-845-4345 |
FAX | 847.725.0077 |
jlampel@lampellaw.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | FFI-T-19-03 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /Justin Lampel/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Justin Lampel |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney |
DATE SIGNED | 09/11/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Wed Sep 11 15:53:54 EDT 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX- 20190911155354672602-8829 6009-610d66e2841c37a2593f f9ceb67275add2c4b992eea32 a23d6824ae4df4c1b65-N/A-N /A-20190911155037892273 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
With respect to the disclaimer requirement for FLEX as being descriptive, Applicant respectfully submits that a mark is descriptive if it immediately describes a significant ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of relevant goods or services. In re Gyulay, 3 U.S.P.Q.2d 1009 (Fed.Cir.1987); In re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 229 U.S.P.Q. 818 (Fed.Cir. 1986). In re MetPath Inc., 223 U.S.P.Q. 88 (T.T.A.B. 1984); In re Bright-Crest, Ltd., 204 U.S.P.Q. 591 (T.T.A.B. 1979); TMEP §1209.01(b). Additionally, not only must a mark immediately impart information about the goods or services, but it must also do so with “a degree of particularity”. In re Intelligent Medical Systems, Inc., 5 U.S.P.Q.2d 1674 (T.T.A.B. 1987); In re Analog Devices Inc., 6 U.S.P.Q.2d 1808 (T.T.A.B. 1988). Finally, any doubts regarding whether a mark is “merely descriptive” are to be resolved in favor of the applicant. In re Conductive Sys., Inc. 220 U.S.P.Q. 84 (T.T.A.B. 1983).
Applicant respectfully submits that the proposed mark is not descriptive, but suggestive.
Applicant respectfully asserts that the mark “FLEX” does not immediately impart information about the goods with a degree of particularity. Instead, the consumer is
required to gather information as to what goods are associated with the mark.
The relevant public would be required to gather further information about Applicant’s goods. Such exercise of information gathering to reach a conclusion of the services is suggestive rather than merely descriptive. In re Nobile Co., 225 USPQ 749, 750 (TTAB 1985) (NOBURST held suggestive as opposed to merely descriptive for a product that reduces the likelihood that pipes of a water system in which it is used will burst since the Board did not “believe this conclusion is readily arrived at by merely observing the mark of the goods but that it requires interpretation by the viewer.”
Accordingly, Applicant respectfully submits that no disclaimer is required.