To: | BevNET.com, Inc. (drwtrademarks@wolfgreenfield.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88294794 - LEAFT - B137920008US |
Sent: | September 10, 2019 08:03:34 PM |
Sent As: | ecom108@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88294794
Mark: LEAFT
|
|
Correspondence Address: WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
|
|
Applicant: BevNET.com, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. B137920008US
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 10, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES
Applicant has also classified a wide variety of goods and services in a single class. For example downloadable podcasts are in Class 9 but non-downloadable videos and podcasts are in Class 41. Applicant’s trade shows and product review website are classified in Class 35 while applicant’s educational seminars are in Class 41. Applicant must separate these services into the proper classes and comply with the requirements for a multi-class application. See the information below.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: “(Note that proposed changes have been placed in bold type. Some items require applicant to include more complete information. These have been designated with brackets { } and bold italics. The information in the brackets is suggested as an example for applicant to follow and should not be merely “cut and pasted.”):
CLASS 9 – Downloadable podcasts for businesses covering issues in the cannabis industry;
CLASS 35 – Providing a website containing product reviews of the goods and services of others in the cannabis industry; arranging and conducting trade shows and industry business conferences in the field of cannabis goods and services; consulting services in the field of business management issues related to the cannabis industry; providing consulting in the field of {specify e.g., advertising, marketing, promoting} cannabis related products and services;
CLASS 41 – Educational services, namely, conducting seminars and conferences on the cannabis industry; providing a website featuring online, non-downloadable publications in the nature of periodicals and newsletters featuring cannabis goods and services; providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of information about cannabis industry goods and services and non-downloadable podcasts for businesses covering issues in the cannabis industry;
CLASS 42 – Providing consulting in the field of {specify e.g., medical, scientific, agricultural} research related to cannabis and cannabis products; consulting in the field of product design and development related to cannabis and cannabis products;
CLASS 44 – Consulting services in the field of the medical and health risks and benefits of using cannabis and cannabis products; consulting services in the field of agricultural and horticultural issues concerning the planting, harvesting and cultivating of cannabis.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTI-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
The application identifies goods and/or services in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least FIVE classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only ONE class. Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
Requirement for Additional Information – CANNABIS-Related services
In addition, applicant must submit a written statement indicating whether all the goods and/or services identified in the application will comply with relevant federal law, including the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 21 USC Sections 801-971. See 37 CFR Section 2.69; TMEP Section 907. The CSA prohibits, among other things, manufacturing, distributing, dispensing or possessing certain controlled substances, including marijuana and marijuana based preparations. 21 USC Sections 812(a)(1), 844(a); see also 21 USC Section 802(16) defining marijuana. The CSA also makes it unlawful to sell, offer for sale or use any facility of interstate commerce to transport drug paraphernalia, i.e., “any equipment, product or material of any kind which is primarily intended or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding, converting, concealing, producing, processing, preparing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, possession of which is unlawful under [the CSA].” 21 USC Section 863.
Finally, applicant must provide written responses to the following questions:
1. Do or will applicant’s identified services identified above in Classes 35, 41, 42 or 44 include the distribution, dissemination or physical possession/handling of marijuana, cannabis, marijuana-based, cannabis-based extracts, oils or derivatives or any other illegal controlled substances?
2. Do or will applicant’s identified services identified above in Classes 35, 41, 42 or 44 include the distribution or dissemination or any products, devices or equipment designed for use or primarily intended for use in connection with smoking, vaping, ingesting, inhaling, producing, preparing, processing, manufacturing or concealing marijuana, cannabis, marijuana-based, cannabis-based extracts, oils or derivatives or any other illegal controlled substances?
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Merely stating that information about the goods and services is available on applicant’s website is an insufficient response and will not make the relevant information of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).
Applicant is advised that, if applicant’s response to this request for information indicates that the services identified in the application do not or will not comply with federal Controlled Substances Act, registration may be refused on the ground that the applied-for mark is not in lawful use in commerce if filed under Section 1(a) of the Trademark Act or that applicant does not have a bona fide intent to lawfully use the applied-for mark in commerce if filed under Sections 1(b), 44 and 66(a) of the Trademark Act. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; see TMEP §907. Gray v. Daffy Dan’s Bargaintown, 823 F.2d 522, 526, 3 USPQ2d 1306, 1308 (Fed. Cir. 1987); see 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.69; In re Midwest Tennis & Track Co., 29 USPQ2d 1386, 1386 n.2 (TTAB 1993); In re Stellar Int’l, Inc., 159 USPQ 48, 50-51 (TTAB 1968); TMEP §907.
ATTORNEY BAR INFORMATION REQUIRED
To provide bar information. Applicant’s attorney should respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her bar information in the “Attorney Information” page of the form, within the bar information section. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii). Bar information provided in any other area of the form will be viewable by the public in USPTO records.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Jeffrey J Look/
Jeffrey J Look
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
Phone: 571-272-1652
Email: jeffrey.look@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE