To: | Interstellar, Inc. (mterrell@innovationPI.law) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88278053 - INTERSTELLAR - 00086 |
Sent: | October 24, 2019 09:34:05 AM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88278053
Mark: INTERSTELLAR
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Interstellar, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 00086
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: October 24, 2019
The application is suspended for the reason specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Prior-Filed Application
The pending application below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark. 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial No. 87288980
Refusal and requirement resolved and maintained and continued. The following issues have been resolved:
• Section 2(d) Refusal based on likelihood of confusion with Reg. No. 4939384
• Potential Section 2(d) Refusal based on Application Serial No. 88214054
• Requirement for amended mark description
See TMEP §713.02.
The following requirement is maintained and continued:
• Requirement for acceptable identification of goods/services
Identification of Services—International Classes 38 and 42
The proposed amended identification of goods and services in Classes 9, 35, and 39 is acceptable. However, the proposed amended identification in Classes 38 and 42 is unacceptable.
Class 38
In this case, the application originally identified the services as follows: “Broadband radio communication services; Communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; Telematic sending of information; Transmission and delivery of data via broadband/satellite M2M and Wireless Communication Networks.”
However, the proposed amendment includes the following services: “Providing Internet access to downloads of books, magazines, newspapers and digital media on a variety of topics via a web site.”
This portion of the proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because the original identification did not include any Internet access services. In addition, Internet access services, or activities encompassing such services, were not listed elsewhere in the application.
Moreover, this wording is unacceptable as indefinite. “Providing internet access” in Class 38 refers to the telecommunication activity of providing access to the Internet. “Providing access” to downloadable publications is not a telecommunications service but only indicates that certain materials are made available for download.
Class 42
The wording “electronic monitoring and reporting of persons, materials, and equipment using computers or sensors” is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant must further specify the “materials and equipment” that is monitored and reported, and must clarify the nature of the monitoring and reporting services as they relate to persons, as the nature of those services is unclear.
The applicant may amend to adopt one or both of the following identifications, if accurate:
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 38: Electronic delivery of electronic library books and electronic books; electronic delivery of books, magazines, newspapers and digital media.
INTERNATIONAL CLASS 42: Electronic data storage; electronic monitoring and reporting of [further specify subject/purpose of monitoring and reporting services; e.g., vehicles, trailers, drivers, and cargo in transit; industrial assets] using computers or sensors.
See id. The identification requirement will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Kimberly Frye/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 113
(571) 272-9430
kimberly.frye@uspto.gov