Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  September 10, 2019

 

Applicant’s response dated January 24, 2019, is acknowledged by this Office action.  The arguments set forth in the response for withdrawing the Section 2(e)(1) refusal have been considered but are unpersuasive.  Consequently, the refusal is continued.  After a further review of the goods in the application, the examining attorney has determined that the goods are improperly classified in Class 8 when the correct classification is Class 26.  Therefore, applicant must classify the goods in Class 26.

 

Section 2(e)(1) Refusal

 

Registration was refused because the applied-for mark merely describes a characteristic of applicant’s goods.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); see TMEP §§1209.01(b), 1209.03 et seq. 

 

Applicant’s proposed mark is BETTERGRIP for finger worn needle pullers.  According to applicant, the wording is not descriptive because the goods are not hand tools and the evidence applies to hand tools.  However, this subtle distinction is immaterial to the issue of whether the wording describes a characteristic of the finger worn needle pullers. 

 

The proposed mark is nothing more than a combination of two descriptive terms.  In re Tower Tech, Inc., 64 USPQ2d 1314, 1317-18 (TTAB 2002) (holding SMARTTOWER merely descriptive of “commercial and industrial cooling towers and accessories therefor, sold as a unit”); In re Sun Microsystems, Inc., 59 USPQ2d 1084, 1087 (TTAB 2001) (holding AGENTBEANS merely descriptive of “computer software for use in the development and deployment of application programs on a global computer network”); In re Putnam Publ’g Co., 39 USPQ2d 2021, 2022 (TTAB 1996) (holding FOOD & BEVERAGE ON-LINE merely descriptive of “a news and information service updated daily for the food processing industry, contained in a database”); In re Copytele, Inc., 31 USPQ2d 1540, 1542 (TTAB 1994) (holding SCREEN FAX PHONE merely descriptive of “facsimile terminals employing electrophoretic displays”).

 

It is clear from the specimen and other similar goods that the term “grip” is used to describe the goods.[1]  The primary purpose of the goods is to grip needles.  The term BETTER in the mark merely conveys to the consumer that applicant’s goods provide a “better” grip.[2]  The applied-for mark immediately informs prospective customers that applicant’s needle pullers provide a better grip for pulling needles.  No imagination is required to discern this feature or characteristic of applicant’s goods.

 

In view of the evidence attached to this final Office action and the initial Office action, the examining attorney maintains that the proposed mark is merely descriptive of applicant’s goods within the meaning of Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1).  Accordingly, the refusal under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act is continued. 

 

Classification of Goods

 

The goods are classified incorrectly.  As indicated by applicant, the goods are worn on fingers in similar way that one would wear sewing thimbles.  These goods would be properly classified in Class 26.  Applicant must amend the application to classify the goods in International Class 26.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7), 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a), 1401.03(b).

 

Proper classification of goods and services is a purely administrative matter within the sole discretion of the USPTO.  See In re Faucher Indus. Inc., 107 USPQ2d 1355, 1357 (TTAB 2013) (quoting In re Tee-Pak, Inc., 164 USPQ 88, 89 (TTAB 1969)).

 

 

 

 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

 

 

/Christopher Buongiorno/

Christopher Buongiorno, Attorney

United States Patent & Trademark Office

Law Office 102

(571) 272-9251

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.