Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Response to Office Action
The table below presents the data as entered.
Input Field
|
Entered
|
SERIAL NUMBER |
88269944 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED |
LAW OFFICE 102 |
MARK SECTION |
MARK FILE NAME |
http://uspto.report/TM/88269944/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT |
HEMP |
STANDARD CHARACTERS |
NO |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE |
NO |
ARGUMENT(S) |
Date: 06-21-2020 Attention: Howard Smiga Trademark Examining Attorney Law Office 102 Howard.smiga@uspto.gov 571-272-9220 Dear Examiner Smiga, The
applicant?s response to the examiner?s Office Action, dated April 14, 2020, application serial #88269944; HEMP and stylized design?, is as follows: NOTE: The applicant did attach his domiciled info
in the 4/14/20 response. NOTE ?The Refusal under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 - FDCA Refusal is maintained and continued. Applicant?s arguments have been considered but found unpersuasive and
unsupported by evidence or existing case law. Inasmuch as the identification of goods which include goods that are consumable and contain CBD, the FDCA Refusal is not overcome. CBD from any source is
not allowed under the FDCA when the goods are consumable or used for medical purposes.? Applicant?s response: In the applicant?s last response, he missed the examiners continued refusal concerning
the FDCA in his Office Action dated 4-14-20. It is the bottom of the Office Action. * The applicant?s line of Industrial Hemp products is fully legal and are NOT in any violation of any Federal laws.
* The applicant?s mark, and associated goods, are fully legal in the USA and are in compliance with the FDA, FDCA and CSA. * Just for the record the FDA overrides the FDCA. The 2 quotes were snipped
from Google searches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?The United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(abbreviated as FFDCA, FDCA, or FD&C), is a set of laws passed by Congress in 1938 giving authority to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to oversee the safety of food, drugs, medical
devices, and cosmetics.? ?The FDA was empowered by the United States Congress to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which serves as the primary focus for the Agency; the FDA also
enforces other laws, notably Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and associated regulations, many of which are not directly related to food ??
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 3 * The applicant?s goods are made of ALL-NATURAL healthy Industrial Hemp
Seed Oil. * In the applicant?s present mark specimens there is absolutely NO CBD or THC. My Hemp? (stylized mark) product does NOT contain any illegal ingredients. The specimen submitted is
industrial Hemp Seed Oil. Please review the label and the hang tag closely. It reads hemp oil. Which is fully legal, and has been for a long time. The applicant has been buying and selling Hemp Seed
Oil for years, from Nutiva? and eBay. Presently, one- gallon costs $58.90. This includes priority USPS shipping. About $0.46 an oz. The applicant has personally been taken hemp seed oil for years. My
2 Golden Retrievers get hemp oil mixed into their dog food twice a day. Please review the original specimen hang-tag and the label, closely. Just the price of $9.99 for 9.5 oz indicates hemp oil. CBD
oil is expensive and CBDa oil is very expensive. Quality CBD oil retails for around $100.00 for 1 oz. Hemp seed oil is fully legal. There is NO mention of CBD on the hang-tag, the label or the
snipped specimen from the applicant?s website. NOTE: The applicant has several registered marks that use the same Hemp Seed Oil ingredient. Examples are: 1> ORxGANIC? registration #6,025,839. This
is a recent registration: 03/31/2020. 2> HiHemp? pending #88355997. It was published of 4/21/20 and will be registered on the principal register. Both #1 and #2 contain the same fully legal Hemp
seed oil as in the present application. NOTE The applicant does NOT like the examiners verbiage that has been entered in the product description. ?Dietary and nutritional supplements containing
industrial hemp; the foregoing solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis? The verbiage insinuates that all Hemp
Seed Oil has a measurable amount of THC. This is NOT true. Hemp seed oil only is extract > ?cold pressed? from the SEEDS. There are NO stems, stock, leaves or flowers in Hemp Seed Oil. The only
way to test this possibility is with Third-party lab results. NOTE: below are 2 cited ULR?s from eBay: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?
_from=R40&_trksid=p2334524.m570.l1313.TR11.TRC2.A0.H0.Xcbd.TRS1&_nkw=cbd&_sacat=0&LH_TitleDe sc=0&_osacat=0&_odkw=hemp http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?
_from=R40&_trksid=p2047675.m570.l1313.TR11.TRC2.A0.H1.Xhemp.TRS1&_nkw=hemp&_sacat=0 Page 2 of 3 The applicant believes he has responded to all of the examiner?s points. Therefore, the
present application should be approved for registered on the Principal register. Thanks for your help with my application. Kindest regards, John D. Blue / applicant-owner Page 3 of 3 |
EVIDENCE SECTION |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE |
evi_174208193-20200621151 742261600_._HEMP_Cloud__3
rd_response.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S)
(3 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\882\699\88269944\xml7\ ROA0002.JPG |
|
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\882\699\88269944\xml7\ ROA0003.JPG |
|
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT 18\882\699\88269944\xml7\ ROA0004.JPG |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE |
3-page PDF response to office action |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) |
NAME |
BLUE, JOHN D. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
johndblue@yahoo.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) |
NAME |
BLUE, JOHN D. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE |
johndblue@yahoo.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) |
NOT PROVIDED |
SIGNATURE SECTION |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE |
/johndblue/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME |
JOHN D. BLUE |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION |
"OWNER" |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER |
8138386437 |
DATE SIGNED |
06/21/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY |
YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION |
SUBMIT DATE |
Sun Jun 21 15:21:59 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP |
USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.X-20
200621152159515668-882699
44-710519b7c85ffa01f9b5fd
378b1b02f17fc5a0b7da8f2ae
97da292f0e58fe99e73-N/A-N
/A-20200621151742261600 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Response to Office Action
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:
Application serial no.
88269944 HEMP (Stylized and/or with Design, see http://tmng-al.uspto.gov /resting2/api/img/8826994 4/large) has been amended as follows:
ARGUMENT(S)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
Date: 06-21-2020 Attention: Howard Smiga Trademark Examining Attorney Law Office 102 Howard.smiga@uspto.gov 571-272-9220 Dear Examiner Smiga, The applicant?s response to the examiner?s Office Action,
dated April 14, 2020, application serial #88269944; HEMP and stylized design?, is as follows: NOTE: The applicant did attach his domiciled info in the 4/14/20 response. NOTE ?The Refusal under
Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 - FDCA Refusal is maintained and continued. Applicant?s arguments have been considered but found unpersuasive and unsupported by evidence or existing case law.
Inasmuch as the identification of goods which include goods that are consumable and contain CBD, the FDCA Refusal is not overcome. CBD from any source is not allowed under the FDCA when the goods are
consumable or used for medical purposes.? Applicant?s response: In the applicant?s last response, he missed the examiners continued refusal concerning the FDCA in his Office Action dated 4-14-20. It
is the bottom of the Office Action. * The applicant?s line of Industrial Hemp products is fully legal and are NOT in any violation of any Federal laws. * The applicant?s mark, and associated goods,
are fully legal in the USA and are in compliance with the FDA, FDCA and CSA. * Just for the record the FDA overrides the FDCA. The 2 quotes were snipped from Google searches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?The United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (abbreviated as FFDCA, FDCA, or
FD&C), is a set of laws passed by Congress in 1938 giving authority to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to oversee the safety of food, drugs, medical devices, and cosmetics.? ?The FDA
was empowered by the United States Congress to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which serves as the primary focus for the Agency; the FDA also enforces other laws, notably Section
361 of the Public Health Service Act and associated regulations, many of which are not directly related to food ??
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 3 * The applicant?s goods are made of ALL-NATURAL healthy Industrial Hemp
Seed Oil. * In the applicant?s present mark specimens there is absolutely NO CBD or THC. My Hemp? (stylized mark) product does NOT contain any illegal ingredients. The specimen submitted is
industrial Hemp Seed Oil. Please review the label and the hang tag closely. It reads hemp oil. Which is fully legal, and has been for a long time. The applicant has been buying and selling Hemp Seed
Oil for years, from Nutiva? and eBay. Presently, one- gallon costs $58.90. This includes priority USPS shipping. About $0.46 an oz. The applicant has personally been taken hemp seed oil for years. My
2 Golden Retrievers get hemp oil mixed into their dog food twice a day. Please review the original specimen hang-tag and the label, closely. Just the price of $9.99 for 9.5 oz indicates hemp oil. CBD
oil is expensive and CBDa oil is very expensive. Quality CBD oil retails for around $100.00 for 1 oz. Hemp seed oil is fully legal. There is NO mention of CBD on the hang-tag, the label or the
snipped specimen from the applicant?s website. NOTE: The applicant has several registered marks that use the same Hemp Seed Oil ingredient. Examples are: 1> ORxGANIC? registration #6,025,839. This
is a recent registration: 03/31/2020. 2> HiHemp? pending #88355997. It was published of 4/21/20 and will be registered on the principal register. Both #1 and #2 contain the same fully legal Hemp
seed oil as in the present application. NOTE The applicant does NOT like the examiners verbiage that has been entered in the product description. ?Dietary and nutritional supplements containing
industrial hemp; the foregoing solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis? The verbiage insinuates that all Hemp
Seed Oil has a measurable amount of THC. This is NOT true. Hemp seed oil only is extract > ?cold pressed? from the SEEDS. There are NO stems, stock, leaves or flowers in Hemp Seed Oil. The only
way to test this possibility is with Third-party lab results. NOTE: below are 2 cited ULR?s from eBay: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?
_from=R40&_trksid=p2334524.m570.l1313.TR11.TRC2.A0.H0.Xcbd.TRS1&_nkw=cbd&_sacat=0&LH_TitleDe sc=0&_osacat=0&_odkw=hemp http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?
_from=R40&_trksid=p2047675.m570.l1313.TR11.TRC2.A0.H1.Xhemp.TRS1&_nkw=hemp&_sacat=0 Page 2 of 3 The applicant believes he has responded to all of the examiner?s points. Therefore, the
present application should be approved for registered on the Principal register. Thanks for your help with my application. Kindest regards, John D. Blue / applicant-owner Page 3 of 3
EVIDENCE
Evidence has been attached: 3-page PDF response to office action
Original PDF file:
evi_174208193-20200621151 742261600_._HEMP_Cloud__3
rd_response.pdf
Converted PDF file(s) ( 3 pages)
Evidence-1Evidence-2Evidence-3
Correspondence Information (current):
BLUE, JOHN D.
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: johndblue@yahoo.com
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
Correspondence Information (proposed):
BLUE, JOHN D.
PRIMARY EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: johndblue@yahoo.com
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES): NOT PROVIDED
Requirement for Email and Electronic Filing: I understand that a valid email address must be maintained by the owner/holder and the owner's/holder's attorney, if appointed, and that all
official trademark correspondence must be submitted via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).
SIGNATURE(S)
Response Signature
Signature: /johndblue/ Date: 06/21/2020
Signatory's Name: JOHN D. BLUE
Signatory's Position: "OWNER"
Signatory's Phone Number: 8138386437
The signatory has confirmed that he/she is not represented by an authorized attorney, and that he/she is either: (1) the owner/holder; or (2) a person or persons with legal authority to bind the
owner/holder; and if he/she had previously been represented by an attorney in this matter, either he/she revoked their power of attorney by filing a signed revocation with the USPTO or the USPTO has
granted this attorney's withdrawal request.
Mailing Address: BLUE, JOHN D.
705 N. STATE ST. #420
UKIAH, California 95482
Mailing Address: BLUE, JOHN D.
705 N. STATE ST. #420
UKIAH, California 95482
Serial Number: 88269944
Internet Transmission Date: Sun Jun 21 15:21:59 ET 2020
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XX.X-20200621152159515
668-88269944-710519b7c85ffa01f9b5fd378b1
b02f17fc5a0b7da8f2ae97da292f0e58fe99e73-
N/A-N/A-20200621151742261600