Notation to File

CLOUDDOT

Senao Networks, Inc.

RE: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request   Dear Ms. Detmer:   I apologize for my delayed response.   We approve your suggested amendments to the descriptions as set forth in your email below.   We also approve your charging our deposit account DA602444 for adding a class to each application.   Regarding your question about the meaning of “DOT” in relation to our client’s goods and services – Our client’s goods and services are not related to the DOT programming language and are not intended to cover the language or any other preexisting technologies or products that might be known by that name, if any exist. I hope that answers your question, but please do let me know if I have misunderstood what you are asking.   Thank you very much for your attention to these files and for your helpful suggestions, and again, please accept my apologies for responding late.   I hope you have a great weekend.   David   David Yang Hawkinson Yang LLP (213) 634-0341 | dyang@hycounsel.com          From: Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@USPTO.GOV> Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 2:22 PM To: David Yang <dyang@hycounsel.com> Cc: Matthew Hawkinson <mhawkinson@hycounsel.com> Subject: RE: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request   Dear Mr. Yang,   I wanted to follow up regarding this one more time. Due to our internal deadlines, if I have not heard from you by 10 am EST Monday morning, I will need to issue an office action. Please let me know if you have any questions.   Best, Carolyn   From: Detmer, Carolyn Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 3:00 PM To: 'dyang@hycounsel.com' <dyang@hycounsel.com> Cc: 'mhawkinson@hycounsel.com' <mhawkinson@hycounsel.com> Subject: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request   Dear Mr. Yang,   I am the trademark examining attorney handling the trademark applications for CLOUDDOT (88268973 and 88268975). In review, there are a couple issues that can be corrected via Examiner’s Amendment without the need for an office action.    First, I require an amended identification of the goods identified in International Class 009 because the come of wording is indefinite and must be clarified. Specifically, the suggested identification would read, with suggested changes underlined:   International Class 009: computer hardware and recorded software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks sold as a unit; downloadable software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks; wireless communications devices, namely, wireless hardware and recorded software for the transmission of voice, data, audio, and video; downloadable publications, namely, electronic instructional publications in the form of manuals, guides, test materials, and magazines in the fields of network communications, and managing, operating and using local, wide and global networks; Downloadable computer software used for building social networking platforms, namely, for use in providing to provide online communications among users and for creating which allows users to create customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles, and information; wireless communication electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, and reviewing voice, audio, video, and da

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88268973

DATE:                                04/08/2019

NAME:                               cdetmer1

NOTE:         

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

 X   Changed TRADEUPS to: Include updated identifcation of goods and services.

 

From: David Yang [mailto:dyang@hycounsel.com]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 5:37 PM
To: Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@USPTO.GOV>
Cc: Matthew Hawkinson <mhawkinson@hycounsel.com>
Subject: RE: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request

 

Dear Ms. Detmer:

 

I apologize for my delayed response.

 

We approve your suggested amendments to the descriptions as set forth in your email below.

 

We also approve your charging our deposit account DA602444 for adding a class to each application.

 

Regarding your question about the meaning of “DOT” in relation to our client’s goods and services – Our client’s goods and services are not related to the DOT programming language and are not intended to cover the language or any other preexisting technologies or products that might be known by that name, if any exist. I hope that answers your question, but please do let me know if I have misunderstood what you are asking.

 

Thank you very much for your attention to these files and for your helpful suggestions, and again, please accept my apologies for responding late.

 

I hope you have a great weekend.

 

David

 

David Yang

Hawkinson Yang LLP

(213) 634-0341 | dyang@hycounsel.com 

 

 

 

 

From: Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@USPTO.GOV>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 2:22 PM
To: David Yang <
dyang@hycounsel.com>
Cc: Matthew Hawkinson <
mhawkinson@hycounsel.com>
Subject: RE: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request

 

Dear Mr. Yang,

 

I wanted to follow up regarding this one more time. Due to our internal deadlines, if I have not heard from you by 10 am EST Monday morning, I will need to issue an office action. Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Best,

Carolyn

 

From: Detmer, Carolyn
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 3:00 PM
To: 'dyang@hycounsel.com' <
dyang@hycounsel.com>
Cc: 'mhawkinson@hycounsel.com' <
mhawkinson@hycounsel.com>
Subject: 88268973 CLOUDDOT and 88268975 CLOUDDOT (with design) USPTO Application Amendment Request

 

Dear Mr. Yang,

 

I am the trademark examining attorney handling the trademark applications for CLOUDDOT (88268973 and 88268975). In review, there are a couple issues that can be corrected via Examiner’s Amendment without the need for an office action. 

 

First, I require an amended identification of the goods identified in International Class 009 because the come of wording is indefinite and must be clarified. Specifically, the suggested identification would read, with suggested changes underlined:

 

International Class 009: computer hardware and recorded software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks sold as a unit; downloadable software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks; wireless communications devices, namely, wireless hardware and recorded software for the transmission of voice, data, audio, and video; downloadable publications, namely, electronic instructional publications in the form of manuals, guides, test materials, and magazines in the fields of network communications, and managing, operating and using local, wide and global networks; Downloadable computer software used for building social networking platforms, namely, for use in providing to provide online communications among users and for creating which allows users to create customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles, and information; wireless communication electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, and reviewing voice, audio, video, and data files; consumer electronics, namely, computer data networking and telecommunications hardware and recorded software for the transmission of voice, data, audio, and video; computer hardware

 

International Class 042: software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, computer software for creating an online community for registered users to social networking, namely, for use in providing engage in online communications among users, engage in social networking, and for creating create customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles, and information

 

Please let me know if you would approve of my amending the identification as described.    Please note that if applicant wishes to add one or more additional classes to the application, an additional fee of $275.00 per added class will be necessary.  In that case, I will make any approved changes and issue a Priority action requiring payment of the fee.  Any added class will remain inactive until the fee is paid, unless applicant specifies otherwise.   Alternatively, if you or applicant has a deposit account with the USPTO, you can provide that account number and authorize the charges against that account.

 

 

Additionally, I see that DOT is programming language. I wanted to inquire if it has any other meaning in relation to your client’s goods/services. Thank you for your help!

 

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns please feel free to call or e-mail me using the information provided in my signature block below. Please respond no later than 3 PM EST on Friday, April 5, 2019. Thank you.

 

Best,

Carolyn Detmer

 

 

Carolyn Detmer

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 127

(571) 272-2722

carolyn.detmer1@uspto.gov

 

Please note that although all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record, this email communication does not constitute a formal response to an office action. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed