To: | Martin, Timm (hfrankel@mandellmenkes.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88255887 - FRESHIE - N/A |
Sent: | September 04, 2019 09:08:28 PM |
Sent As: | ecom115@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88255887
Mark: FRESHIE
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Martin, Timm
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: September 04, 2019
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending application(s) below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application(s) below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application(s) below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application(s) below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial No(s). 87-434649
Applicant’s argument that it’s earlier filed related application for different goods registered over the prior pending potential citation cited herein is not persuasive as to cite made herein.
Refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) resolved and maintained and continued. The following refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) is/are maintained and continued:
• The identification/classification of goods requirement. The proposed entry “non-carbonated non-alcoholic beverages” remains indefinite. Applicant must indentify these goods specifically by common commercial name and properly classify the goods. By way of example, applicant may indicate “non-carbonated non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit drinks and water beverages” in class 32, if accurate.
See id. These refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
Please feel free to contact the undersigned attorney if you wish to discuss this application.
/John S. Yard/
John S. Yard
Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
(571)272-9486
john.yard@uspto.gov