To: | LBMC, PC (docket@iplawgroup.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88253995 - LBMC ISO INFORMATION SECURITY - 10855-020166 |
Sent: | September 16, 2019 04:04:11 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
9United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88253995
Mark: LBMC ISO INFORMATION SECURITY
|
|
Correspondence Address: PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 1600 DIVISION STREET, SUITE 500
|
|
Applicant: LBMC, PC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 10855-020166
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 16, 2019
The statement of use has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SPECIMEN REFUSAL – DOES NOT SHOW USE BY AUTHORIZED PARTY
Registration is refused because the specimen of record does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce as a certification mark. 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1052, 1054, 1127; see 37 C.F.R. §§2.45(a)(4)(i)(E), 2.56(a), (b)(5); TMEP §§904.07(a), 1306.02(a)(i)(B), 1306.04(c). A certification mark specimen must show how an authorized party other than the owner uses the mark in commerce to certify “regional or other origin, material, mode of manufacture, quality, accuracy, or other characteristics of that person’s goods or services; or that members of a union or other organization performed the work or labor on the goods or services.” 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(5); TMEP §1306.02(a)(i)(B).
In the present case, the specimen consists of the applied-for mark being used in applicant’s advertising. The specimen does not show proper certification mark use because the specimen does not show how an authorized user uses the mark in commerce.
Examples of specimens for services may include brochures, advertisements, website printouts or other matter indicating that the services have been certified. See id.
To submit a verified substitute specimen online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, applicant should (1) answer “Yes” to form wizard question #2; and then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, do the following for each relevant class for which a substitute specimen is being submitted: (2) under “Classification and Listing of Goods/Services/Collective Membership Organization,” select the following statement, “Check here to modify the current classification number; listing of goods/services; dates of use; and/or filing basis; or to submit a substitute specimen or foreign registration certificate. If not checked, the changes will be ignored.”; (3) under “Specimen File,” attach a specimen (attachment may not exceed 5 megabytes); (4) describe what the specimen consists of; and (5) select the following statement: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application” [for an application based on Section 1(a), Use in Commerce] OR “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce prior either to the filing of the Amendment to Allege Use or expiration of the filing deadline for filing a Statement of Use” [for an application based on Section 1(b) Intent-to-Use]. Note: When submitting a verified substitute specimen, the TEAS online response form requires two signatures: one in the “Declaration Signature” section and one in the “Response Signature” section.
Applicant may not withdraw the statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.88(f); TMEP §1109.17.
COPY OF CERTIFICATION STANDARDS REQUIREMENT
Further, the standards are not required to be created by the applicant, but may be established by another party, such as a government agency or private research organization. Id.
In this case, applicant submitted an advertising the references the ISO 27001 standards, but a complete copy of the ISO 27001 standards were not submitted.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Marcya N. Betts/
Marcya N. Betts
Examining Attorney
Law Office 106
(571) 272-4913
Marcya.Betts@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE