To: | Telchemy, Inc. (swoldow@sgrlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88251978 - VQANALYZER - 041253.054 |
Sent: | October 23, 2019 09:12:35 AM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88251978
Mark: VQANALYZER
|
|
Correspondence Address: SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP |
|
Applicant: Telchemy, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 041253.054
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: October 23, 2019
This Suspension Notice responds to applicant’s communication dated 10/02/2019 where applicant:
(1) Provided arguments against the Section 2(d) Refusal;
(2) Provided arguments against the Section 2(e)(1) Refusal;
(3) Provided information about the mark and the goods; and
(4) Provided an amended identification of goods and added class 42 to the application.
The examining attorney has reviewed the applicant’s response and determined the following:
(1) Upon further review, and in light of the amended identification of goods and services, it has been determined that the Section 2(d) Refusal is no longer necessary. Therefore, the Section 2(d) Refusal has been obviated.
(2) Applicant’s arguments against the Section 2(e)(1) Refusal have been reviewed but are not persuasive. Applicant’s offered alternative meaning of the wording in the mark is still merely descriptive of the goods and services. Thus, the Section 2(e)(1) Refusal is maintained and continued.
(3) Applicant’s provided information is accepted. Therefore, the Information requirement is satisfied.
(4) Applicant’s amended identification of goods and added class have been accepted. Therefore, the Identification and Classification requirement as well as the Clarification of Classes requirement have been satisfied.
(5) The prior pending application has neither registered nor abandoned. Therefore, this application will be suspended until the final disposition of the prior-filed application.
The application is suspended for the reason specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending application below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark. 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application below was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial No. 87232603
Refusal and requirements resolved and maintained and continued. The following refusal and requirements are satisfied or obviated:
See TMEP §713.02.
The following requirement is maintained and continued:
See id. This refusal will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
Rebecca Coughlan
/Rebecca D. Coughlan/
Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 113
Phone: 571-272-4975
Email: rebecca.coughlan@uspto.gov