To: | ROLI Ltd. (watrademarks@weissarons.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88248117 - SOUL - 279-002 |
Sent: | October 22, 2019 06:24:32 AM |
Sent As: | ecom110@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88248117
Mark: SOUL
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: ROLI Ltd.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 279-002
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 22, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
The issue(s) raised in the previous March 27, 2019 Office action are as follow: Request for Information, and Requirement for a Foreign Registration in International Class 009.
Based on applicant’s response, dated, September 27, 2019, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirement(s) have been satisfied: applicant provided information on the use of the goods, and confirmed applicant’s intent to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration.
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
• NEW ISSUE: Amend the Identification of Goods and Services to include 01/2019 NICE changes
Applicant should note the following additional ground for refusal.
The assigned trademark examining attorney inadvertently omitted a requirement relevant to the mark in the subject application. See TMEP §§706, 711.02. Specifically, an amendment was made to the TM ID MANUAL on 01/01/2019 requiring that computer software goods indicate the specifications indicated below.
The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the delay in raising this issue(s).
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Applicant must clarify the wording as set forth below because it is indefinite and too broad. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. The identification for software/computer programs/mobile applications and/or firmware in International Class 9 is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified to specify whether the format is downloadable, recorded, or online non-downloadable. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.03(d), 1402.11(a). Downloadable and recorded goods are in International Class 9, whereas providing their temporary, online non-downloadable use is a service in International Class 42. See TMEP §1402.03(d).
The following are examples of acceptable identifications in International Class 9: “recorded desktop publishing software” and “downloadable mobile applications for managing bank accounts.” Additionally, the following are acceptable identifications in International Class 41: “providing online non-downloadable game software” and “providing temporary use of non-downloadable game software.” Finally, the following are acceptable identifications in International Class 42: “providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools” and “providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for calculating energy costs.”
Applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate:
International Class 009:
International Class 041:
Training and education related to computer software for processing audio, firmware and hardware
International Class 042:
Providing online non-downloadable Computer programming for processing audio, design and development of computer software and computer programs for processing audio; design and development of computer codes for processing audio; design and development of computer firmware and firmware systems; provision of information regarding computer programs, computer software and computer programming language for processing audio, computer firmware; support services for computer programming; providing online non-downloadable web programming software and web programming support services, cloud computing and storage services; computer consulting services; expert consulting services within the information and communication technology sectors; application services provider services; platform as a service (PaaS); computer code conversion for others; installation of firmware; configuration of computer firmware; configuration of computer hardware
The USPTO requires such specificity in order for a trademark examining attorney to examine the application properly and make appropriate decisions concerning possible conflicts between the applicant’s mark and other marks. See In re N.A.D. Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1872, 1874 (TTAB 2000); TMEP §1402.03(d).
Upon the applicant’s satisfactory amendment of the identification of goods and services above, the application will be suspended pending receipt of the foreign registration.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/C. Dionne Clyburn/
C. Dionne Clyburn
LO 110
571-272-9358
dionne.clyburn@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE