To: | Ke Qin (aotumanmark@hotmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88240393 - GREATCASE - N/A |
Sent: | July 03, 2019 07:25:36 PM |
Sent As: | ecom118@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88240393
Mark: GREATCASE
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Ke Qin
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: July 03, 2019
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 5/30/19. The applicant’s amended identification of goods is acceptable.
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending application(s) below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application(s) below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application(s) below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application(s) below is provided in this letter.
- U.S. Application Serial No(s). 88173962
Refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) resolved and maintained and continued. The following refusal is obviated:
• Section 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal
See TMEP §713.02.
The following refusal is maintained and continued:
• Section 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion Refusal in view of Registration No. 4537278 now for the goods identified as “Notebook computers; Protective films adapted for computer screens; Protective films adapted for smartphones; Telephone sets; Video screens; Wireless cellular phone headsets; Wireless chargers.”
See id. These refusals will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Kelley L. Wells/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 118
571-272-9312
kelley.wells@uspto.gov