UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/15/2019

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

However, applicant must address the following.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

 

·       Clarification of the Identification of Goods

·       Multi-class Application Advisory and Requirements

·       Requirement for a Translation Statement

 

CLARIFICATION OF THE IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

Applicant is advised to delete or modify the duplicate wording in the identification of goods in International Class 009 for “Digital camera” and International Class 010 for “Dental apparatus, namely”.  See generally TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(a).  If applicant does not respond to this issue, be advised that the USPTO will remove duplicate wording from the identification prior to registration.

 

If modifying one of the duplicate entries, applicant may amend it to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Also, generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

Additionally, applicant must clarify the wording “Wearable computers in the nature of connected bracelets” and “Wearable electronic devices, namely, wearable computers” in the identification of goods in International Class 009 because it is indefinite and too broad.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  This wording is indefinite because it does not make clear the nature of the goods.  Further, this wording could identify goods in more than one international class.  For example, “wearable computers in the nature of smartglasses” are in Class 009, “wearable computers in the nature of activity trackers sold as integral components of running shoes” are in Class 025, and “jewelry in the nature of bracelets incorporating a computer storage device containing medical information for medical alert purposes” are in Class 014.

 

Based on the other goods listed in the application, it is likely that the applicant’s wearable computers and wearable electronic devices are in the nature of smartwatches or activity trackers in Class 009.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate.  Suggested edits are in bold.

 

·       Class 009:  Cameras; Optical video camera; Viewfinders, photographic; Digital camera; DVR for security monitoring; Digital camera; Digital Video Recorder; Stands for photographic apparatus; Lenses for photographic apparatus; Vehicle video recorder; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations; Video Monitors; Theft prevention installations, electric, namely, theft alarms; Anti-theft warning apparatus, namely, burglar alarms; Smartglasses; Smartwatches; Wearable computers in the nature of connected bracelets in the nature of wearable activity trackers; Wearable activity trackers; Wearable electronic devices, namely, wearable computers in the nature of wearable activity trackers; Virtual reality glasses 

 

·       Class 010:  Mirrors for dentists; Orthodontic appliances; Endoscopy cameras for medical purposes; Apparatus for DNA and RNA testing for medical purposes; Microscopes for surgical operations; surgical mirrors; Optometric instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; Medical instrument for ophthalmology diagnostics; Physical exercise apparatus, for medical purposes; Apparatus for Physical training for medical use; Medical apparatus and instruments for monitoring oxymetory, gas analysis and vital signs; Medical apparatus and instruments for use in surgery; Medical devices, namely, patient monitors and patient sensors for monitoring and measuring blood properties and respiratory events; Dental apparatus, namely, Dental apparatus, namely, intra-oral light systems; medical and dental apparatus for dimensional measurement, namely, 3D scanner for human body; Dental device that expands the mouth to improve the field of view inside the mouth, and extracts saliva from the work area inside the mouth; Dental instruments, namely, root canal therapy instruments used to shave the inside of a root canal; Dental instruments, namely, dental examination chair; Orthodontic machines and instruments; Surgical apparatus and instruments for veterinary use; medical instruments to measure blood pressure, cardiac output and other physiological and cardiovascular parameters; medical instruments for use in performing biopsies; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus; X-ray diagnostic apparatus; Organoleptic diagnostic testing apparatus for medical, dental or cosmetic use; Medical diagnostic apparatus, analytical apparatus for medical purposes and blood pressure measuring apparatus 

 

If applicant adopts the suggested wording above to add international classes, applicant must comply with the multiple-class requirements specified in this Office action below.

 

Scope Advisory

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).  Additionally, for U.S. applications filed under Trademark Act Section 44(e), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments may not exceed the scope of the goods identified in the foreign registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); Marmark, Ltd. v. Nutrexpa, S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989) (citing In re Löwenbräu München, 175 USPQ 178, 181 (TTAB 1972)); TMEP §§1012, 1402.01(b).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

MULTI-CLASS APPLICATION ADVISORY AND REQUIREMENTS

 

The application identifies goods in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b) and Trademark Act Section 44:

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods that can be classified in more than two classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only two classes.  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) and Section 44 multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

Fee Advisory

 

The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a).  See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.

 

REQUIREMENT FOR A TRANSLATION STATEMENT

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must specify whether “FASMEDO” in the mark has any meaning in a foreign language.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(9), 2.61(b); TMEP §§809, 814.  If the wording has meaning in a foreign language, applicant must provide an English translation, and may use the following format:

 

·       The English translation of “FASMEDO” is “<insert translation>”.

 

TMEP §809.03.

 

Alternatively, if the wording has no meaning in a foreign language, applicant should provide the following statement:

 

·       The wording “FASMEDO” has no meaning in a foreign language. 

 

Id.

 

ASSISTANCE

 

Applicant is encouraged to call or email the assigned attorney below to resolve the issues in this Office action.

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

/Julie H. Choe/

Trademark Examining Attorney

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 126

(571) 270-3368

Julie.Choe@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 3/15/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88237197

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 3/15/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.