To: | Cali Holdings, LLC (trademarkprosecution@zuberlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88223659 - REUP - 2969-1005 - Request for Reconsideration Denied - Return to TTAB |
Sent: | January 09, 2020 07:26:01 PM |
Sent As: | ecom121@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88223659
Mark: REUP
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Cali Holdings, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 2969-1005
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
AFTER FINAL ACTION
DENIED
Issue date: January 09, 2020
Accordingly, the following requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action dated 5/23/2019 are maintained and continued:
• Request To Change Applicant Name – No Assignment Recorded
REQUEST TO CHANGE APPLICANT NAME – NO ASSIGNMENT RECORDED
If the application was filed by the owner and the original applicant has since changed its name or transferred ownership of the mark to another entity, the new owner must file documentation to establish its current ownership of the application by satisfying one of the following:
(1) The new owner must (a) record an assignment, name change, or other documentation affecting title with the USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch showing a clear chain of title to the mark in the new owner; and (b) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that the documentation has been recorded.; OR
(2) The new owner must file either (a) a written statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, explaining in detail the chain of title to the new owner; or (b) documentation showing transfer of title to the new owner. However, the registration will not issue in the name of the new owner without recording chain of title documentation with the USPTO and notifying the trademark examining attorney, as specified in (1) above.
TMEP §502.01; see 15 U.S.C. §1060; 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(1), 3.73(b)(1); TMEP §502.02(a).
Assignments and other documents affecting title may be filed electronically. There is a fee for recording ownership changes. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(b)(6), 3.41(a); TMEP §503.03(d). Recording an assignment or other ownership transfer document does not constitute a response to an Office action. TMEP §503.01(d). Applicant must still file a separate response to this Office action. See id.
Applicant’s Arguments
In its responses applicant has repeatedly argued that the company was mistakenly referred to as CALI HOLDINGS, LLC, instead of CALI HOLDINGZ, INC. This is more than a clerical error, and therefore cannot be changed with the affidavit of good faith. However, TMEP 1201.02(c)(3) specifically states Minor clerical errors such as the mistaken addition or omission of "The" or "Inc." in the applicant’s name may be corrected by amendment, as long as this does not result in a change of entity. In this case, applicant would change the entity designation from LLC to Corporation. Therefore, the entity cannot be changed on the basis of a minor clerical error.
If the party listed as the applicant did not exist on the application filing date, the application may be amended to correct the applicant’s name. See Accu Pers. Inc. v. Accustaff Inc., 38 USPQ2d 1443 (TTAB 1996) (holding application not void ab initio where corporation named as applicant technically did not exist on filing date, since four companies who later merged acted as a single commercial enterprise when filing the application); Argo & Co. v. Springer, 198 USPQ 626, 635 (TTAB 1978) (holding that application may be amended to name three individuals as joint applicants in place of an originally named corporate applicant which was never legally incorporated, because the individuals and non-existent corporation were found to be the same, single commercial enterprise); Pioneer Elec., 183 USPQ 613 (holding that applicant’s name may be corrected where the application was mistakenly filed in the name of a fictitious and non-existent party).
If the owner of a mark legally changed its name before filing an application, but mistakenly lists its former name on the application, the error may be corrected, because the correct party filed, but merely identified itself incorrectly. In re Techsonic Indus., Inc., 216 USPQ 619 (TTAB 1982).
See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).
If applicant has already filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will be notified to resume the appeal. See TMEP §715.04(a).
If applicant has not filed an appeal and time remains in the six-month response period, applicant has the remainder of that time to (1) file another request for reconsideration that complies with and/or overcomes any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a notice of appeal to the Board. TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B). Filing a request for reconsideration does not stay or extend the time for filing an appeal. 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3); see TMEP §715.03(c).
/Alexander Mangubat/
Alexander Mangubat
Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
(571)270-3561
Alexander.Mangubat@uspto.gov