Offc Action Outgoing

EMOP

Thane IP Limited

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88221332 - EMOP - 83876.00002

To: Thane IP Limited (nshabani@greenbergglusker.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88221332 - EMOP - 83876.00002
Sent: August 09, 2019 02:04:07 PM
Sent As: ecom113@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88221332

 

Mark:  EMOP

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Natasha Shabani

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machti

1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2100

Los Angeles CA 90067

 

 

 

Applicant:  Thane IP Limited

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 83876.00002

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 nshabani@greenbergglusker.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  August 09, 2019

 

This Office Action responds to applicant’s communication dated 07/18/2019 where applicant:

 

(1)  Provided arguments against the Section 2(e)(1) Refusal; and

 

(2)  Amended the identification of goods.

 

The examining attorney has reviewed the applicant’s response and determined the following:

 

(1)   Applicant’s arguments have been reviewed but are not persuasive. Therefore, the Section 2(e)(1) Refusal is maintained and continued.

 

(2)   Applicant’s amended identification of goods in Class 11 is accepted. However, the amended identification of goods in Classes 03, 07, and 09 are not accepted. The amended to the goods in International Class 007 remain indefinite and overly broad as to “apparatus for making cleaning preparations for household purposes” because the word “apparatus” does not make clear the specific type of good applicant offers and therefore, it is also unclear if the goods are properly classified. Additionally, the amendments to the identifications in Classes 03 and 09 are beyond the scope of the identification of goods in the original application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  Applicant’s goods may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the original identification in the application, and any previously accepted amendments, remain operative for purposes of future amendment.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.07(d).

 

            In this case, the application originally identified the goods in class 03 as “cleaner for      fruits and vegetables” and in Class 09 as “electro-chemical activation equipment in the   nature of electrolytic cells for use in treating various aqueous solutions for the production of nolyte and catholyte solution.”

 

            However, the proposed amendment identifies the following goods in class 03 “liquid and      spray cleaner for use on fruits, vegetables and other food items” and in class 09 “electro-        chemical activation equipment in the nature of electrodes, namely anolyte and catholyte for      use in treating various aqueous solutions.” 

 

            This portion of the proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification in class 03 because the original identification limited the cleaner to only fruits and        vegetables, however, the amended identification of goods broadens the limitation to “other    food items”. Additionally, the proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original   identification in class 009 because the original identification limited the use of the electrolytic cells to “treating various aqueous solutions for the production of nolyte and        catholyte solution”, however, the amended identification broadens the use to “treating various aqueous solutions.” Therefore, the amended identifications of goods in Classes 03           and 09 exceed the scope of the identification in the original application and thus, the         original identifications remain operative.

 

Thus, the amended identification of goods in class 11 is accepted and the identification of goods requirement for classes 03, 07, and 09 is maintained and continued.

 

(3)   Bar information and an attestation of good standing are required from the applicant’s Attorney of record. Therefore, the new Attorney Bar Information Requirement must issue below.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

 

·       Attorney Bar Information Required

 

ATTORNEY BAR INFORMATION REQUIRED

 

Attorney bar information required.  Applicant’s attorney must provide the following bar information:  (1) his or her bar membership number, if the bar provides one; (2) the name of the U.S. state, commonwealth, or territory of his or her bar membership; and (3) the year of his or her admission to the bar.  37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(3).  This information is required for all U.S.-licensed attorneys who are representing trademark applicants at the USPTO.  Id.  If the attorney’s bar does not issue bar membership numbers, applicant must state this for the record.  See id.

 

Attorney attestation required.  Applicant’s attorney must provide the following statement:  “I attest that I am an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia and any U.S. Commonwealth or territory).”  See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(3).  This is required for all U.S.-licensed attorneys who are representing trademark applicants at the USPTO.  Id. 

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal and requirements in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action  

 

 

/Rebecca D. Coughlan/

Rebecca D. Coughlan

Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

(571)272-4975

rebecca.coughlan@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88221332 - EMOP - 83876.00002

To: Thane IP Limited (nshabani@greenbergglusker.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88221332 - EMOP - 83876.00002
Sent: August 09, 2019 02:04:08 PM
Sent As: ecom113@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on August 09, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88221332

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Rebecca D. Coughlan/

Rebecca D. Coughlan

Examining Attorney

Law Office 113

(571)272-4975

rebecca.coughlan@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from August 09, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed