UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88217311
MARK: SIMPLY DONE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Topco Holdings, Inc. (Cooperative)
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/1/2019
SUMMARY OF ISSUES
SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Registrant’s mark in Reg. No. 5105762 is SIMPLY DONE for “Aluminum foil,” “Parchment paper; wax paper; plastic garbage bags; general purpose plastic bags; paper filters for coffee makers,” and “Plastic storage containers for household use; paper baking cups.”
Registrant’s mark in Reg. No. 5443893 is SIMPLY DONE for “Laundry detergents,” “Disposable dinnerware, namely, bowls,” and “Vinegar.”
Registrant’s mark in Reg. No. 5355500 is SIMPLY DONE for “Computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives,” “light bulbs,” “Office supplies and school supplies, namely, pens, pencils, highlighting markers, felt tip markers, drawing brushes, paint brushes, binder clips, paper clips, push pins, erasers, pencil holders, drawing compasses, shipping labels, drawing rulers, paper hole punches, pencil sharpeners, staplers; envelopes; adhesive tapes for stationery or household purposes; glue for stationery or household purposes,” and “Cigarette lighters not of precious metal; matches.”
Registrant’s mark in Reg. No. 5228605 is SIMPLY DONE for “Plastic cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons” and “Brooms; mops; rubber household gloves; cleaning sponges; drinking straws; toothpicks.”
Applicant’s mark is SIMPLY DONE for “Kitchen gadgets; can openers, used for organizing private residence” and “Cookware, Bakeware, spatula, Scrubber Brushes, Toilet Bowl Brush, Lint roller, laundry Bins/Baskets.”
Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered mark that it is likely consumers would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source of the goods and/or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). Likelihood of confusion is determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “du Pont factors”). In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Only those factors that are “relevant and of record” need be considered. M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Commc’ns, Inc., 450 F.3d 1378, 1382, 78 USPQ2d 1944, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1241, 73 USPQ2d 1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); see In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1744 (TTAB 2018).
Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis: (1) the similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and/or services. See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.,544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
Comparison of the Marks
In the present case, applicant’s mark is SIMPLY DONE and registrant’s marks are SIMPLY DONE. These marks are identical in appearance, sound, and meaning, “and have the potential to be used . . . in exactly the same manner.” In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015), aff’d, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Additionally, because they are identical, these marks are likely to engender the same connotation and overall commercial impression when considered in connection with applicant’s and registrant’s respective goods. Id.
Therefore, the marks are confusingly similar.
Comparison of the Goods
Registrant’s goods in Reg. No. 5105762 are “Aluminum foil,” “Parchment paper; wax paper; plastic garbage bags; general purpose plastic bags; paper filters for coffee makers,” and “Plastic storage containers for household use; paper baking cups.”
Registrant’s relevant goods in Reg. No. 5443893 are “Laundry detergents,” and “Disposable dinnerware, namely, bowls.”
Registrant’s relevant goods in Reg. No. 5355500 are “light bulbs,” and “Office supplies and school supplies, namely, pens, pencils, highlighting markers, felt tip markers, drawing brushes, paint brushes, binder clips, paper clips, push pins, erasers, pencil holders, drawing compasses, shipping labels, drawing rulers, paper hole punches, pencil sharpeners, staplers; envelopes; adhesive tapes for stationery or household purposes; glue for stationery or household purposes.”
Registrant’s relevant goods in Reg. No. 5228605 are “Plastic cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons” and “Brooms; mops; rubber household gloves; cleaning sponges; drinking straws; toothpicks.”
Applicant’s goods are “Kitchen gadgets; can openers, used for organizing private residence” and “Cookware, Bakeware, spatula, Scrubber Brushes, Toilet Bowl Brush, Lint roller, laundry Bins/Baskets.”
Section 2(d) Refusal – Conclusion
The parties’ marks are identical and the parties’ goods are highly related. It is therefore likely that a consumer would mistakenly believe that the parties’ goods emanate from the same source. As such, registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(d).
Section 2(d) Refusal – Response Options
(1) Record the assignment with the USPTO’s Assignment Recordation Branch (ownership transfer documents such as assignments can be filed online at http://etas.uspto.gov) and promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that the assignment has been duly recorded.
(2) Submit copies of documents evidencing the chain of title.
(3) Submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant is the owner of U.S. Registration Nos. 5105762¸ 5443893, 5355500¸and 5228605.” To provide this statement using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), use the “Response to Office Action” form; answer “yes” to wizard questions #3 and #10; then, continuing on to the next portion of the form, in the “Additional Statement(s)” section, find “Active Prior Registration(s)” and insert the U.S. registration numbers in the data fields; and follow the instructions within the form for signing. The form must be signed twice; a signature is required both in the “Declaration Signature” section and in the “Response Signature” section.
TMEP §812.01; see 15 U.S.C. §1060; 37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(1), 3.25, 3.73(a)-(b); TMEP §502.02(a).
Recording a document with the Assignment Recordation Branch does not constitute a response to an Office action. TMEP §503.01(d).
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRES AMENDMENT
Class 8
The wording “kitchen gadgets” must be clarified because it is indefinite and too broad. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. This wording is indefinite because it does not make clear what the goods are. Further, this wording could identify goods in more than one international class. For example, gadgets in the nature of spiral slicers and fruit peelers are in Class 8, whereas spatulas are in Class 21.
Similarly, the wording “can openers, used for organizing private residence” See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. This wording is indefinite because it does not make clear what the goods are. Further, this wording could identify goods and/or services in more than one international class. For example, electric can openers are in Class 7, whereas non-electric can openers are in Class 8. Based upon the specimen of record, it appears that applicant’s goods are in the nature of non-electric can openers.
Class 21
The wording “cookware” is indefinite and must be amended to indicate the specific cookware items provided, such as pots and pans. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
The wording “spatulas” is indefinite and must be amended to specify that the spatulas are household utensils. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
The wording “laundry bins/baskets” is indefinite and must be amended to specify that they are for household use. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.
Suggested Amended Wording
Applicant may adopt the following, with additions in bold and deletions in strikethrough, if accurate:
Class 8: Kitchen gadgets, namely, {indicate specific items, e.g., food choppers, mandolin slicers, spiral slicers, and vegetable and fruit peelers};
non-electric can openers, used for organizing private residence
Class 21: Cookware, namely, {indicate specific goods, e.g., pots and pans}; bakeware; household utensils, namely, spatulas;
scrubbinger brushes; toilet bowl brushes; lint rollers; laundry bins and baskets for household use
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
LEGAL ENTITY REQUIRES CLARIFICATION
If applicant is a cooperative association, applicant must amend the legal entity and provide the U.S. state under whose laws it is organized. TMEP §803.03(h). If applicant is a corporation, applicant must provide the legal name of the corporation and U.S. state or foreign country of incorporation or organization. See TMEP §803.03(c).
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration will be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
ASSISTANCE
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
Caroline L. Moran
/Caroline L. Moran/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 125
(571) 272-3255
caroline.moran@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.