To: | Driven Golf, Inc. (rob.phillips@fisherbroyles.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88215375 - DG - 11210.T001US |
Sent: | October 03, 2019 02:25:17 PM |
Sent As: | ecom119@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88215375
Mark: DG
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Driven Golf, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 11210.T001US
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 03, 2019
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on September 11, 2019.
On March 11, 2019, an Office Action on this application issued raising the following issues:
1) requirement for an acceptable identification of goods restricted to Classes paid.
Applicant’s amended identification of goods remains unacceptable in part.
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
The identification of goods as amended currently in Class 9 remains indefinite as specified further below and must be clarified. See TMEP §1402.01. For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP §1402.04.
The following recitations remain unacceptable:
The wording “aids” and “articles” in International Class 9 must be clarified because it is indefinite as it does not specify the name or the type of the aid.
See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In addition, this identification is too broad and could identify goods in more than one international class. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. For example, “Golf training equipment, namely, a motorized golf chipping practice
aid” is in International Class 28 and “Golf scopes” are in Class 9. The means by which the goods ‘attach’ to a club is not determinative of classification or of
function. For Class 9 goods, the goods must be electronic or optical, e.g., in the nature of a swing analyzer, and if ‘mechanical’ in nature in Class 28, must
specify the function. The wording “tangible article” is meaningless to define the nature of the golf training aid.
See, in the Manual, the DELETED entry for
028 Golf training apparatus, namely, devices used to help groove a repetitive putting stroke D 02/28/2013 GOODS
with the Note explaining:
On 02-28-2013, this 12-24-2009 entry was deleted because the description is overbroad and may include goods in Class 9 or Class 28. General descriptions of sports training devices are indefinite and must provide sufficient information about the function and/or purpose of the goods to support classification in Class 9 as electronic or computer software-based training apparatus or Class 28 as sports equipment.
Therefore, applicant must amend this wording to specify either (1) the common generic name of each piece of equipment or (2) the nature and purpose or function of the equipment. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.
Applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate:
Golf training aids, namely, electronic angular momentum sensors with transmitters designed to attach to a golfer and/or golf club and improve a golfer's swing and that relay data to a computer for analysis, in Class 9;
Apparel, namely, T-shirts, shirts, hats, caps, sweatshirts, pants, sweat suits, hoodies and socks; in Class 25;
Golf training aids, namely, weights designed to attach to a golfer and/or golf club and improve a golfer's swing, in Class 28.
An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the services, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the services. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.\
The requirement is thus made FINAL.
MULTIPLE CLASSES -- INSUFFICIENT FEES
The application identifies goods and/or services in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/tm_fee_info.jsp). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least 4 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 2 classes. Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
Therefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee(s) already paid, or (2) submit the fees for the additional class(es).
The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a). See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
The requirement is thus made FINAL.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)
/Hanno Rittner/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 119
hanno.rittner@uspto.gov
571-272-7188
RESPONSE GUIDANCE