NOTE TO THE FILE
Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 88207560SERIAL NUMBER: 88207517
DATE: 08/26/2019
NAME: cbuongiorno
NOTE:
Searched:
Lexis/Nexis
OneLook
Wikipedia
Acronym Finder Protest evidence reviewed
Other:Checked:
Geographic significance
Surname
Translation
ID with ID/CLASS mailboxChecked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents
Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
phone Left message with
email Attorney/ApplicantRequested Law Library search Issued Examiner’s Amendment
for: and entered changes in TRADEUPSPRINT DO NOT PRINT Added design code in TRADEUPS
Description of the mark
Translation statement Re-imaged standard character
drawing
Negative translation statement
Consent of living individual Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
about misclassified definite ID
Changed TRADEUPS to:X OTHER:
From: Buongiorno, Christopher
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 3:40 PM
To: Pam Kundrotas <pkundrotas@turtlewax.com>
Subject: RE: Trademark Application Serial Nos. 88207560 and 88207517
Dear Ms. Kundrotas,
I just left you a voicemail message. It would be best to discuss your questions via a telephone call.
Regards,
Christopher Buongiorno
United States Patent & Trademark Office
Attorney – Law Office 102
(571) 272-9251
From: Pam Kundrotas [mailto:pkundrotas@turtlewax.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 3:36 PM
To: Buongiorno, Christopher <Christopher.Buongiorno@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: RE: Trademark Application Serial Nos. 88207560 and 88207517
Dear Mr. Buongiorno:
Thank you for your reply.
I left you a voice mail message earlier this afternoon.
My question is I don’t understand why you did not accept the Class 5 specimen – I used our Dog Gone Fresh Product specimens as proof of use. This is not sold in a kit. It is sold separately.
I do understand why you rejected the Class 21 and 24 specimens as those products are sold in kits not separately and I will remove those two classes from the application.
Thank you for your time.
Pamela Kundrotas