Offc Action Outgoing

HYPERFLEX

TruFlex Sanders, LLC

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88176738 - HYPERFLEX - N/A

To: TruFlex Sanders, LLC (wbm@wbmillslaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88176738 - HYPERFLEX - N/A
Sent: December 31, 2019 01:10:39 PM
Sent As: ecom122@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88176738

 

Mark:  HYPERFLEX

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Wendy B Mills

WB MILLS, PLLC

SUITE 130

14275 MIDWAY ROAD

ADDISON TX 75001

 

 

Applicant:  TruFlex Sanders, LLC

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 wbm@wbmillslaw.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  December 31, 2019

 

This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on September 11, 2019, in connection with this application.  Based on information and/or documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new identification requirement and fee requirement.  See TMEP §§706, 711.02. 

 

In a previous Office action dated September 11, 2019, the trademark examining attorney issued a specimen refusal for failing to show use of the applied-for mark in commerce with the actually identified goods.  Due to applicant’s identification amendments being unacceptable, the specimen refusal is continued and maintained at this time.

 

Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous September 11, 2019 Office action within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action.  37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02.  If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES

 

·         Identification of Goods

·         Added Class—Additional Fees Required

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS:

 

The proposed amendment to the identification is not acceptable because it exceeds the scope of the identification in the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  Applicant’s goods may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the original identification in the application, and any previously accepted amendments, remain operative for purposes of future amendment.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.07(d).

 

In this case, the application originally identified the goods as flexible abrasives in Class 003. 

 

However, the proposed amendment adds Class 008 and identifies hand tools—here being hand-operated sanders and hand-operated flexible sanders. 

 

This proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because hand-operated sanders are separate and distinct goods from applicant’s identified abrasives. Compare, e.g., Trademark ID Manual, Term ID 008-768, with Trademark ID Manual, Term ID 003-919.

 

Scope Advisory

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to broaden or expand the goods beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

ADDED CLASS: ADDITIONAL FEES REQUIRED:

 

Note: The following requirement does not obviate the above identification scope issue.  If applicant deletes the added out-of-scope Class 008 goods, this requirement no longer applies.

 

The communication filed on November 30, 2019 added a class and submitted no additional fees.  However, the fees submitted with the original application are sufficient for only one class.  In a multiple-class application, a fee for each class is required.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01, 1403.01.

 

Therefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee(s) already paid, or (2) submit the fees for the additional class(es).

 

The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a).  See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.

 

GENERAL RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

Sjogren, Jeffrey

/Jeffrey Sjogren/

Examining Attorney - Law Office 122

jeffrey.sjogren@uspto.gov

Phone: 571-272-5279

Fax: 571-273-5578

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88176738 - HYPERFLEX - N/A

To: TruFlex Sanders, LLC (wbm@wbmillslaw.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88176738 - HYPERFLEX - N/A
Sent: December 31, 2019 01:10:40 PM
Sent As: ecom122@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 31, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88176738

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Sjogren, Jeffrey

/Jeffrey Sjogren/

Examining Attorney - Law Office 122

jeffrey.sjogren@uspto.gov

Phone: 571-272-5279

Fax: 571-273-5578

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from December 31, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed