The mark consists of the stylized letters ISS forming an arrow pointing to the stylized letters ISS above the stylized letters INTELLIGENT VIDEO. DEFINED.
Mark For: ISS ISS INTELLIGENT VIDEO. DEFINED.™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
>Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of the stylized letters ISS forming an arrow pointing to the stylized letters ISS above the stylized letters INTELLIGENT VIDEO. DEFINED.
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 88156378 |
Mark Literal Elements | ISS ISS INTELLIGENT VIDEO. DEFINED. |
Mark Drawing Type | 5 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WITH WORD(S) /LETTER(S)/ NUMBER(S) INSTYLIZED FORM |
Mark Type | TRADEMARK. SERVICE MARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2019-07-31 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Carol Anne Been |
Attorney Docket Number | 15257367-tbd |
Law Office Assigned | L90 |
Employee Name | BIBB, SCOTT |
2018-10-16 | Application Filed |
2019-06-17 | Abandon |
2019-07-31 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2019-07-31 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
2019-07-31 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2019-08-01 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 14800 Route 9 North, Suite 202 Woodbridge, NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES 07095 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
![]() | IMAGE/JPEG | 2018-10-16 |
![]() | APPLICATION/XML,IMAGE/JPEG | 2018-10-16 |
![]() | MULTI | 2018-12-14 |
![]() | XML | 2018-12-14 |
![]() | XML | 2019-08-01 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Computer software, namely, computer software for video management and image analytics for use in managing surveillance, security and alarm systems; computer software for use in monitoring and remotely controlling electronic surveillance and alarm systems; equipment for monitoring and remote control of surveillance systems, motion detectors and electronic security devices(ABANDONED)
IC 045. US 100 101. G & S: Electronic security services, namely, remote monitoring of surveillance, security and alarm systems
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 45 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2019-08-01 | |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2019-07-31 | |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2018-12-14 | 6325 |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2018-12-14 | 83186 |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2018-12-14 | 6325 |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2018-12-06 | 83186 |
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2018-10-26 | |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2018-10-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.