To:Harris, Samuel (vendingvenue@yahoo.com)
Subject:U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88156101 - EYECANDI - N/A
Sent:1/31/2019 3:23:54 PM
Sent As:ECOM113@USPTO.GOV
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO.  88156101

 

MARK: EYECANDI

 

 

        

*88156101*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

       HARRIS, SAMUEL

       201 LAS VEGAS BLVD S STE 100, 201 LAS VE

       201 LAS VEGAS BLVD S STE 100, 201 LAS VE

       LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

       

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

 

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

 

APPLICANT: Harris, Samuel

 

 

 

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  

       N/A

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

       vendingvenue@yahoo.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/31/2019

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

IDENTIFICATION INDEFINITE – AMENDMENT REQUIRED

 

The identification of goods/services is indefinite and must be clarified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. 

 

The wording “Clothing featuring men and womens:” is indefinite and must be amended. The colon makes the entry ambiguous. Applicant must clarify the wording.

 

The wording “leisure ware” and “athletic ware” is indefinite. Applicant must specify the specific type of leisurewear and athletic wear.

 

The wording “”knee and thigh high men’s underwear” is ambiguous. Applicant must clarify the articles of clothing being provided.

 

“Footware:”, “head ware:”, “outerware:” and “swimwear:” is ambiguous due to colon usage. Applicant must clarify the nature of the these clothing articles.

 

The wording “cover ups” and “wraps” is indefinite. Applicant must specify the type of cover ups and wraps.

 

“Polo, camp, rugby shirts” appears to identify the three types of shirts, but the wording is not clear. Applicant should clarify that these goods are all shirts.

 

Applicant must also clarify the types of clothing implicated by “athletic tennis ware” and “sportswear”.

 

Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:

 

Class 25 – Clothing, namely, men’s and women’s sleepwear, loungewear, clothing wraps and robes, sports and leisurewear, namely, (applicant to specify, e.g., t-shirts, hats, pants, etc.): sweat suits, jogging suits, athleticwear in the nature of sweatshirts and pants; legwarmer leggings, pajamas, gowns, womens lingerie, knee and thigh-high stockings; mens underwear, footwear, namely, boots, slippers, sandals, shoes and socks; headwear, namely, hats, caps, visors, headbands; scarfs. Outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, parkas, shawls, mittens, gloves, earmuffs, ponchos. Swimwear, namely, beach shoes, flip flops, swimming suits, beach cover ups, clothing wraps; Men dress shirts, women’s blouses, Polo shirts, camp shirts, rugby shirts, tank tops, jerseys and tee shirts; Belts, ties, suspenders; Athletic tennis wear and sportswear, namely, tennis wear, tennis shoes, tennis dresses

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

AMENDMENT TO MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIRED

 

Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark because the current one is incomplete and does not describe all the significant aspects of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Descriptions must be accurate and identify all the literal and design elements in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808 et seq. 

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of a silhouette of a woman sitting with her knees up and one of her legs kicking into the air. Below the silhouette are the words “EYECANDI” written in stylized letters.

 

TEAS PLUS AND TEAS RF ADVISORY

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

RESPONDING TO THIS OFFICE ACTION

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

/John Schmidt/

Examining Attorney, Law Office 113

United States Patent and Trademark Office

(571) 272-7082

john.schmidt@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.