UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/9/2019

 

 

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES THAT APPLICANT MUST ADDRESS

 

• Section 2(e)(4) Surname Refusal
• Disclaimer Advisory
• Claimed Prior Registrations Not Pertinent
• Prior Pending Applications

 

SECTION 2(e)(4) – PRIMARILY MERELY A SURNAME

 

Registration is refused because the applied-for mark is primarily merely a surname.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(4); see TMEP §1211. 

 

An applicant’s mark is primarily merely a surname if the surname, when viewed in connection with the applicant’s recited goods and/or services, “‘is the primary significance of the mark as a whole to the purchasing public.’”  Earnhardt v. Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 864 F.3d 1374, 1377, 123 USPQ2d 1411, 1413 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Hutchinson Tech. Inc., 852 F.2d 552, 554, 7 USPQ2d 1490, 1492 (Fed. Cir. 1988)); TMEP §1211.01.

 

The following five inquiries are often used to determine the public’s perception of a term’s primary significance:

 

(1)       Whether the surname is rare;

 

(2)       Whether anyone connected with applicant uses the term as a surname;

 

(3)       Whether the term has any recognized meaning other than as a surname;

 

(4)       Whether the term has the structure and pronunciation of a surname; and

 

(5)       Whether the term is sufficiently stylized to remove its primary significance from that of a surname.

 

In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 & n.2, 1282-83 (TTAB 2016) (citing In re Benthin Mgmt. GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-34 (TTAB 1995) for the Benthin inquiries/factors); TMEP §1211.01; see also In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 16-18, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985). 

 

These inquiries are not exclusive, and any of these circumstances – singly or in combination – and any other relevant circumstances may be considered when making this determination.  In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d at 1277-78; TMEP §1211.01.  For example, when the applied-for mark is not stylized, it is unnecessary to consider the fifth inquiry.  In re Yeley, 85 USPQ2d 1150, 1151 (TTAB 2007); TMEP §1211.01.

 

Please see the attached evidence from LEXISNEXIS®, establishing the surname significance of BROOKSHIRE.  This evidence shows the applied-for mark appearing 7707 times as a surname in the LEXISNEXIS® surname database, which is a weekly updated directory of cell phone and other phone numbers (such as voice over IP) from various data providers. 

 

If the mark combines a surname with an additional term, the mark will be evaluated to determine if the primary significance of the mark as a whole in connection with applicant’s goods and/or services is still that of a surname.  See Earnhardt v. Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 864 F.3d 1374, 1377, 123 USPQ2d 1411, 1413 (Fed. Cir. 2017); TMEP §1211.01(b).  A key element in this determination is the relative distinctiveness of the additional term in the mark.  Earnhardt v. Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 864 F.3d at 1377, 123 USPQ2d at 1413 (citing In re Hutchinson Tech. Inc., 852 F.2d 552, 554-55, 7 USPQ2d 1490, 1492 (Fed. Cir. 1988)); TMEP §1211.01(b)(vi). 

 

A nondistinctive term is typically accorded less weight and is not likely to detract from the primary surname significance of the mark.  See Azeka Bldg. Corp. v. Azeka, 122 USPQ2d 1477, 1481 n.9, 1482 (TTAB 2017) (construing In re Hutchinson Tech. Inc., 852 F.2d at 554, 7 USPQ2d at 1492-93); TMEP §1211.01(b)(vi).  Although individual components of a mark may be weighed to determine the mark’s overall commercial impression, the combination of the individual parts must be viewed as a whole to determine if the additional term alters the primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public.  Earnhardt v. Kerry Earnhardt, Inc., 864 F.3d at 1378-79, 123 USPQ2d at 1414 (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1174-75, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2004)). 

 

In this case, the addition of BROTHERS does not alter the primary significance of the mark as a whole from that of a surname.  The addition of a common and nondistinctive entity designation, such as “Inc.” or “Co.,” or wording that identifies a family business, such as “Bros.” or “& Sons,” does not diminish the surname significance of a term that is otherwise primarily merely a surname.  See In re I. Lewis Cigar Mfg. Co., 205 F.2d 204, 206, 98 USPQ 265, 267 (C.C.P.A. 1953) (S. SEIDENBERG & CO’S.); In re Integrated Embedded, 120 USPQ2d 1504, 1507 (TTAB 2016) (BARR GROUP); In re P.J. Fitzpatrick, Inc., 95 USPQ2d 1412, 1412 (TTAB 2010) (P.J. FITZPATRICK, INC.); In re Piano Factory Grp. Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1522, 1526-27 (TTAB 2007) (VOSE & SONS).  The attachment from Collins English Dictionary describes the term as “[b]rothers is used in the names of some companies and shops.”  Thus the term is an entity designator.

 

Furthermore, combining a surname with a term that is merely descriptive, primarily geographically descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or generic of an applicant’s goods and/or services typically does not “detract from the primary surname significance” of the mark.  Azeka Bldg. Corp. v. Azeka, 122 USPQ2d 1477, 1481-82, 1481 n.9 (TTAB 2017) (construing In re Hutchinson Tech. Inc., 852 F.2d 552, 554, 7 USPQ2d 1490, 1492-93 (Fed. Cir. 1988)); see TMEP §1211.01(b)(vi). 

 

Specifically, the term PHARMACY is generic for the applicant’s retail pharmacy services.  The term RX is merely an abbreviation for prescription which is generic for the product provided through the applicant’s pharmacy services.  Therefore, when the terms are combined with the surname it does not create a separate, distinct commercial impression. 

 

The examining attorney refers to the attached webpage taken from the applicant’s website which states that the company was founded by two brothers with the surname of BROOKSHIRE.  A term that is the surname of an individual applicant or that of an officer, founder, owner, or principal of applicant’s business is probative evidence of the term’s surname significance.  TMEP §1211.02(b)(iv); see, e.g., In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F.2d 15, 16, 225 USPQ 652, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (holding DARTY primarily merely a surname where “Darty” was the surname of applicant’s corporate president); In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1278-80 (TTAB 2016) (holding ALDECOA primarily merely a surname where ALDECOA was the surname of the founder and individuals continuously involved in the business); In re Integrated Embedded, 120 USPQ2d 1504, 1507 (TTAB 2016) (holding BARR GROUP primarily merely a surname where BARR was the surname of the co-founder and applicant’s corporate officer and GROUP was found “incapable of lending source-identifying significance to the mark”); Miller v. Miller, 105 USPQ2d 1615, 1620, 1622-23 (TTAB 2013) (holding MILLER LAW GROUP primarily merely a surname where “Miller” was the surname of the applicant and the term “law group” was found generic).

 

Evidence that a term has no recognized meaning or significance other than as a surname is relevant to determining whether the term would be perceived as primarily merely a surname.  See In re Weiss Watch Co., 123 USPQ2d 1200, 1203 (TTAB 2017); In re Eximius Coffee, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1276, 1280 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §1211.02(b)(vi).  The attached evidence from MacMillan Dictionary shows that BROOKSHIRE does not appear in the dictionary.  Thus, this term appears to have no recognized meaning or significance other than as a surname. 

 

Lastly, adding a non-distinctive design element or letter stylization to a term that is primarily merely a surname does not change the surname significance of the term.  The primary significance of such a mark would still be that of a surname.  TMEP §1211.01(b)(ii); see In re Pickett Hotel Co., 229 USPQ 760, 763 (TTAB 1986) (holding PICKETT a surname despite use of stylized lettering); cf. In re Benthin Mgmt. GmbH, 37 USPQ2d 1332, 1333-34 (TTAB 1995).

 

In view of the foregoing, the primary significance of BROOKSHIRE is primarily merely that of a surname, and registration on the Principal Register is therefore refused.

 

RESPONSE OPTIONS

 

A mark deemed primarily merely a surname may be registered on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f) based on a claim of acquired distinctiveness.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(f); 37 C.F.R. §2.41(a); TMEP §§1211, 1212.  Applicant may respond by asserting a claim of acquired distinctiveness based on one or more of the following:

 

(1)       Prior Registrations:  Applicant may claim ownership of one or more active prior registrations on the Principal Register of the same mark for goods and/or services that are sufficiently similar to those named in the pending application.  37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(1); TMEP §§1212, 1212.04.  Applicant may do so by submitting the following statement, if accurate:  “The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services as evidenced by the ownership of active U.S. Registration No(s). __________ on the Principal Register for the same mark for sufficiently similar goods and/or services.”  TMEP §1212.04(e).

 

(2)       Five Years’ Use:  Applicant may submit the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services through the applicant’s substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate for at least the five years immediately before the date of this statement.”  37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(2); TMEP §1212.05(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(1).

 

(3)       Other Evidence:  Applicant may submit other evidence of acquired distinctiveness, with the following statement, if accurate:  “The evidence shows that the mark has become distinctive of the goods and/or services.”  37 C.F.R. §2.41(a)(3); TMEP §1212.06.  Such additional evidence may include “advertising expenditures, sales success, length and exclusivity of use, unsolicited media coverage, and consumer studies (linking the name to a source).”  In re Change Wind Corp., 123 USPQ2d 1453, 1467 (TTAB 2017) (quoting In re Steelbuilding.com, 415 F.3d 1293, 1300, 75 USPQ2d 1420, 1424 (Fed. Cir. 2005)). 

 

If applicant cannot satisfy one of the above, applicant may respond by amending the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register.  See 15 U.S.C. §1091; 37 C.F.R. §§2.47, 2.75(a).

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.  However, if applicant responds to the refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.

 

DISCLAIMER ADVISORY

 

Applicant is advised that, if the application is amended to seek registration on the Principal Register under Trademark Act Section 2(f) or on the Supplemental Register, applicant will be required to disclaim “BROTHERS” because such wording appears to be generic in the context of applicant’s goods and/or services.  See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); In re Wella Corp., 565 F.2d 143, 144, 196 USPQ 7, 8 (C.C.P.A. 1977); In re Creative Goldsmiths of Wash., Inc., 229 USPQ 766, 768 (TTAB 1986); TMEP §1213.03(b).  Please refer to the attached definition of brothers which demonstrates that the term is an entity designator and is therefore generic.  Furthermore, the term pharmacy is generic of applicant’s retail pharmacy services.

 

Applicant may submit a disclaimer in the following format:

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “BROTHERS PHARMACY” apart from the mark as shown.

 

TMEP §1213.08(a)(i).

 

For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.

 

CLAIMED PRIOR REGISTRATIONS NOT PERTINENT

 

Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration Nos. 4165638, 4313493, and 4305675 will not be printed on any registration that may issue from this application because the marks are different.  Only prior registrations of the same or similar marks are considered related registrations for purposes of an ownership claim.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.

 

PRIOR PENDING APPLICATIONS

 

The filing dates of pending U.S. Application Serial Nos. 86199663, 86199664, and 86199666 precedes applicant’s filing date.  See attached referenced applications.  If the marks in the referenced applications register, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between the marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced applications.

 

In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the marks in the referenced applications.  Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.

 

ASSISTANCE

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

 

/Tarah Hardy Ludlow/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 110

571-272-9361

tarah.hardy@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

 

 

 

 

Search:	Public Records : Surname
Terms:	last-name(brookshire) maxresults(2000)

 

Total number found: 7707
No.	Name	Address	Phone
1.	BROOKSHIRE, A	394 S 52ND SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478-6221	541-497-0833
2.	BROOKSHIRE, A	6321 BRANFORD WILMINGTON, NC 28412-3196	828-729-3151
3.	BROOKSHIRE, A	6321 BRANFORD WILMINGTON, NC 28412-3196	828-850-3077
4.	BROOKSHIRE, A	2709 BRASSIE FLOSSMOOR, IL 60422-1821	312-927-8033
5.	BROOKSHIRE, A	2709 BRASSIE FLOSSMOOR, IL 60422-1821	708-220-2376
6.	BROOKSHIRE, A	202 DECATUR BOSSIER CITY, LA 71111-6258	318-560-5680
7.	BROOKSHIRE, A	1008 S HARMONY SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99016-8794	509-270-3099
8.	BROOKSHIRE, A	1008 S HARMONY SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99016-8794	509-901-0328
9.	BROOKSHIRE, A	313 IVY RIDGE JASPER, GA 30143-8359	770-401-7845
10.	BROOKSHIRE, A	3201 KARI APT 815 GREENVILLE, TX 75402-7286	903-217-7027
11.	BROOKSHIRE, A	203 N LA SALLE STE 2100 CHICAGO, IL 60601-1226	312-927-8033
12.	BROOKSHIRE, A	203 N LA SALLE STE 2100 CHICAGO, IL 60601-1226	708-220-2376
13.	BROOKSHIRE, A	203 N LA SALLE STE 2100 CHICAGO, IL 60601-1226	708-642-9376
14.	BROOKSHIRE, A	504 E LEXINGTON INDEPENDENCE, MO 64050-3009	816-521-9850
15.	BROOKSHIRE, A	116 S MEYERS SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99016-5128	509-263-4215
16.	BROOKSHIRE, A	116 S MEYERS SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99016-5128	509-270-3099
17.	BROOKSHIRE, A	116 S MEYERS SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99016-5128	509-901-0328
18.	BROOKSHIRE, A	373 PINEWOOD ASHEBORO, NC 27205-0922	336-953-5677
19.	BROOKSHIRE, A I	PO BOX 770457 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80477-0457	970-879-1234
20.	BROOKSHIRE, A V	PO BOX 84 CAPAC, MI 48014-0084	269-476-1383
21.	BROOKSHIRE, A	16019 RUSTLERS TRAIL CYPRESS, TX 77429-3989	816-682-7213
22.	BROOKSHIRE, A	4345 SILVERLEAF VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462-5738	757-717-3684
23.	BROOKSHIRE, A	8106 STAR TREK SHINGLETOWN, CA 96088-9774	714-858-0424
24.	BROOKSHIRE, A	703 WADE HAMPTON GREENVILLE, SC 29609-4939	864-201-8457
25.	BROOKSHIRE, A	413 WELSH LEXINGTON, KY 40509-2131	859-494-5865
26.	BROOKSHIRE, A	4505 WILLA CREEK APT 203 WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708-5282	407-405-7882
27.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ALPHARETTA, GA 30004	678-682-1353
28.	BROOKSHIRE, A	AMARILLO, TX 79101	806-576-9664
29.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ASHEBORO, NC 27203	336-302-6586
30.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ASHEVILLE, NC 28806	828-301-0334
31.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATHENS, GA 30601	706-308-3354
32.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30032	404-376-7512
33.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30188	770-402-5965
34.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30301	404-376-7512
35.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30301	770-402-5965
36.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30309	678-592-4875
37.	BROOKSHIRE, A	ATLANTA, GA 30345	678-548-5576
38.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BABSON PARK, FL 33827	863-589-2747
39.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301	661-623-7033
40.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301	661-623-7035
41.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BAKERSFIELD, CA 93301	661-623-7036
42.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BALLWIN, MO 63011	573-247-5826
43.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BATON ROUGE, LA 70814	225-200-1017
44.	BROOKSHIRE, A	BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203	205-835-4245
45.	BROOKSHIRE, A	CEDARTOWN, GA 30125	678-988-4300
46.	BROOKSHIRE, A	CHARLOTTE, NC 28217	704-898-4596
47.	BROOKSHIRE, A	CHICAGO HEIGHTS, IL 60411	708-539-2393
48.	BROOKSHIRE, A	CLARKESVILLE, GA 30523	706-499-1511
49.	BROOKSHIRE, A	CUDAHY, WI 53110	414-366-2029
50.	BROOKSHIRE, A	DAYTON, OH 45469	937-520-8123

 

Search:	Public Records: Surname
Terms:	last-name(brookshire) maxresults(2000)
Date/Time:	Wednesday, January 09, 2019 12:33 PM
Permissible Use:	Your DPPA Permissible Use: I have no permissible use Your GLBA Permissible Use: I have no permissible use

 

Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 1/9/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88134495

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 1/9/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.