To: | Zander's LLC. (trademarks@harvey.law) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88131573 - TRADER - N/A |
Sent: | March 09, 2020 03:12:31 PM |
Sent As: | ecom126@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88131573
Mark: TRADER
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Zander's LLC.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
Applicant’s Response Is Incomplete
Issue date: March 09, 2020
The application is abandoned because applicant’s response to the final Office action dated August 17, 2019, is not complete for the reason(s) stated below. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a); TMEP §§718.02, 718.03.
In this case, applicant did not (1) raise a new issue, (2) resolve all outstanding issue(s) in the final Office action, (3) provide any new or compelling evidence with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or shed new light on the outstanding issue(s).
Submission of new arguments in response to the same refusal or requirement does not raise a new issue that requires the examining attorney to issue a subsequent final or nonfinal action. Generally, if the same refusal or requirement was made before, the examining attorney does not have to issue a subsequent final or nonfinal action. See TMEP §715.03(b). In the instant case, the applicant has amended the drawing from standard character to the mark with the same wording with slight stylization. This amendment was not accompanied by any new arguments against the Section 2(d) refusals, or the Section 2(e)(1) refusal, nor is this amendment new evidence that would obviate either of those refusals.
Additionally, applicant did not timely file a notice of appeal and no time remains in the response period.
Applicant may file a Petition to the Director Under Trademark Rule 2.146 within two months of the issue date of this notice to request that the abandonment determination be reversed and the application be returned to active status. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1705.04, 1713.01-.02. However, the Director will grant the petition in rare cases if (1) the USPTO committed a clear procedural error or abuse of discretion, or (2) applicant can show substantial compliance with the response requirements. TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(D), 718.03(b), 1713.01-02.
/Taylor Duenas/
Taylor Duenas
Examining Attorney
Law Office 126
571-270-3964
Taylor.Duenas@uspto.gov