UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.  A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/22/2018

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

INTRODUCTION AND SEARCH

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

 

COUNTRY OF ORIGIN

Registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 44(e) because the foreign registration is not from applicant’s country of origin.  See 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01.  Specifically, applicant has submitted a foreign registration from Australia to support applicant’s Section 44(e) basis; however, the application shows that applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in New Zealand.

 

To obtain registration under Section 44(e), an applicant must be the owner of a valid registration from the applicant’s country of origin.  15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01.  Under Section 44(c), “country of origin” is defined as the country in which an applicant (1) is domiciled, (2) has a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or (3) is a national.  15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.

 

Because applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in a country different from the country that issued the foreign registration, applicant must establish that, as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration, the country that issued the foreign registration is also applicant’s country of origin.  See 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04. 

 

Thus, to overcome this refusal, applicant may provide the following written statement for the record: 

 

“Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in Australia as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.” 

 

TMEP §1002.04. 

 

If applicant cannot assert that Australia is a country of origin, applicant may delete the Section 44(e) basis and substitute Section 1(a) or 1(b), if applicant can satisfy all the requirements for the new basis.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b); TMEP §§806.03, 1002.01.

 

 

IDENTIFICATION OF THE GOODS

Registration is refused because the goods identified in the U.S. application are completely different from, and thus exceed the scope of, the goods in the foreign registration.  See 15 U.S.C. §1126; 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01(b).  For the goods and/or services in a U.S. application based on Trademark Act Section 44, an applicant is required to list only goods and/or services that that are within the scope of the goods and/or services in the foreign registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1012, 1402.01(b). 

 

In this case, the U.S. application identifies the goods and/or services as follows:  “Hook and loop fastening tape.” 

 

However, the foreign registration identifies the following goods and/or services:  “Cable covering panels for electric cables; cable covers (conduits).”

 

The goods in the U.S. application exceed the scope of goods in the foreign registration because “hook and loop fastening tape” is not a panel or cover for a cable. 

 

Applicant may respond by substituting a basis under Section 1(a) or 1(b), provided all requirements are satisfied for each claimed basis.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126; 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); Marmark Ltd. v. Nutrexpa S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989); TMEP §§806.03(h), 806.04.

 

To amend an application to assert a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b) filing basis, an applicant must provide the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date.”  See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2).

 

For more information about Section 1(b) basis requirements, and instructions on how to satisfy them online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to the Basis webpage.

 

 

DISCLAIMER

Applicant must provide a disclaimer of the unregistrable part(s) of the applied-for mark even though the mark as a whole appears to be registrable.  See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).  A disclaimer of an unregistrable part of a mark will not affect the mark’s appearance.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965).

 

A “disclaimer” is a statement in the application record that an applicant does not claim exclusive rights to an unregistrable component of the mark.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965); TMEP §1213.  A disclaimer does not physically remove the disclaimed matter from the mark or otherwise affect the appearance of the mark.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d at 979, 144 USPQ2d at 433; TMEP §1213.

 

In this case, applicant must disclaim all the wording in the mark because it is not inherently distinctive.  These unregistrable terms at best are merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). 

 

The attached dictionary evidence from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition copyright ©2018  shows the wording “secure” to be defined as “To make firm or tight; fasten,” and the wording “cord” to be defined as “An insulated flexible electric wire fitted with a plug or plugs.”   Thus, the wording merely describes the purpose of applicant’s hook and loop fastening tape used to secure cords.  The examining attorney relies on the above-referenced dictionary definitions together with the attached web pages showing hook and loop fastening ties and straps for securing cables and cords.  Please see attached.

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format: 

 

“No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SECURE CORD” apart from the mark as shown.” 

 

For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this issue using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage. 

 

 

MARK DESCRIPTION

Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark that agrees with the mark on the drawing.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  The current description is inconsistent with the mark on the drawing and thus is inaccurate.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Descriptions must be accurate and identify only those literal and design elements appearing in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.02, 808.03(d). 

 

Applicant must provide an amended description of the mark that includes all the literal and design elements and colors shown in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.  If black, white, and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude them from the color claim and include in the description a statement that black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark.  See TMEP §807.07(d).

 

The following description is suggested, if accurate:

 

“The mark consists of a black rectangle with stylized representations of an electrical plug at each end with a white horizontal line above and below the yellow wording “SECURE CORD” with a partial white horizontal line on either side of the wording.  The remaining white represents background and does not form part of the mark.”

 

 

TRADEMARK LAWYER SUGGESTED

Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines involved in the USPTO application process, applicant may wish to hire a qualified U.S. attorney specializing in trademark matters to represent applicant in this process and provide legal advice.  Although the undersigned trademark examining attorney is permitted to help an applicant understand the contents of an Office action as well as the application process in general, no USPTO attorney or staff is permitted to give an applicant legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights.  TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

For attorney referral information, applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help or an online directory of legal professionals, such as FindLaw®.  The USPTO, however, may not assist an applicant in the selection of a private attorney.  37 C.F.R. §2.11.

 

Please note that foreign attorneys, other than duly authorized Canadian attorneys, are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c), (e); TMEP §602.03-.03(c). 

 

The only attorneys who may practice before the USPTO in trademark matters are (1) attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. commonwealths/territories; and (2) duly authorized Canadian agents/attorneys.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(a), (c); TMEP §602.

 

 

CLOSING

For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. 

 

 

/Tracy L. Fletcher/

Trademark Attorney, Law Office 115

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Direct Dial: (571) 272-9471

tracy.fletcher@uspto.gov

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.