To: | Shenzhen Noto-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd. (huihu@a-grass.com) |
Subject: | U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88113038 - NICWELL - N/A |
Sent: | 12/26/2018 3:34:48 PM |
Sent As: | ECOM103@USPTO.GOV |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88113038
MARK: NICWELL
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: SHENZHEN NOTO-TECH ; SHENZHEN NOTO-TECH |
CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
|
APPLICANT: Shenzhen Noto-Tech Electronics Co., Ltd.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
|
OFFICE ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/26/2018
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
To obtain registration under Section 44(e), an applicant must be the owner of a valid registration from the applicant’s country of origin. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01. Under Section 44(c), “country of origin” is defined as the country in which an applicant (1) is domiciled, (2) has a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or (3) is a national. 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Because applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in a country different from the country that issued the foreign registration, applicant must establish that, as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration, the country that issued the foreign registration is also applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Thus, to overcome this refusal, applicant may provide the following written statement for the record: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in ____________ {applicant must specify a country in the European Union} as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.” TMEP §1002.04. If applicant cannot assert that such country is a country of origin, applicant may delete the Section 44(e) basis and substitute Section 1(a) or 1(b), if applicant can satisfy all the requirements for the new basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b); TMEP §§806.03, 1002.01.
PARTICULAR GOODS EXCEED SCOPE OF FOREIGN REGISTRATION
In this case, the U.S. application identifies the particular goods: “Oral vaporizers for smokers” and “Filter tips” in International Class 34.
However, the foreign registration identifies the following goods:
Class 34: Electronic cigarettes; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; Tips of yellow amber for cigar and cigarette holders; Cigarette tips; Tobacco pipes; Cigarette cases; Cigarette holders; Mouthpieces for cigarette holders; Pipe racks for tobacco pipes; Tobacco jars; Ashtrays for smokers; Electronic cigarette atomizers; Cigarette filters; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for tobacco; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes
These goods in the U.S. application exceed the scope of the goods in the foreign registration because the identification of goods in the foreign registration is narrowly worded and does not encompass the broadly worded “Oral vaporizers for smokers” and “Filter tips”. Thus, these goods in the U.S. application are not acceptable and may not be amended to correspond with the goods in the foreign registration.
Applicant may respond to this issue by satisfying one of the following:
(1) Amending the identification of goods in the U.S. application to the following (suggested changes in bold):
Class 34: Ashtrays for smokers; Cigarette cases; Cigarette filters; Cigarette holders; Electronic cigarettes; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for tobacco; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; Oral vaporizers for smokers, namely, electronic cigarette atomizers sold empty; Pipe racks for tobacco pipes; Tobacco jars; Tobacco pipes; Cigarette filter tips
(2) Amending the identification of goods in the U.S. application to correspond to the goods in the foreign registration, if possible, to ensure that all goods beyond the scope of the foreign registration are deleted from the U.S. application; or
(3) Substituting a basis under Section 1(a) or 1(b) for those goods and/or services in the U.S. application that are beyond the scope of the foreign registration. An applicant may assert more than one basis in an application (except Section 1(a) and 1(b) may not be asserted for the same goods and/or services), provided all requirements are satisfied for each claimed basis.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)-(b), 1126; 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.34(b), 2.35(b); Marmark Ltd. v. Nutrexpa S.A., 12 USPQ2d 1843, 1845 (TTAB 1989); TMEP §§806.02, 806.03(h), 1402.01(b).
Additionally, applicant may respond by arguing that these goods are within the scope of the foreign registration and should remain in the U.S. application.
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
ASSISTANCE
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Chioma (Bata) Oputa/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
(571) 272-5234
chioma.oputa@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/. Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.